Travel is a Right not a Privilege

[flipperthedolfin]

How many of you OWN your motor car?

 

Take a look at your V5 document and on the front you will see in the blue strip near the top

THIS IS NOT PROOF OF OWNERSHIP it shows who is responsible for registering and taxing the vehicle.

 

Write or contact the DVLA and ask them who owns your car and they will not answer,

the reason being that once you register your car with them they take the ownership from you hence the V5 states You are the registered keeper.

 

I wrote to the DVLA and sent them a Notice of Understanding and Intention to Claim of Right in September this year.

 

I was claiming back my right of ownership of my car.

I gave them 14 days in which to disagree with my terms and they failed to respond.

 

I then sent them a Notice of Non Response and Irrevocable Lawful Estoppel by Acquiescence

which means because they failed to respond with any counterclaims they are deemed to have accepted my terms by acquiescence.

All of this is a perfectly lawful contract.

 

I also notified the Transport secretary Philip Hammond of my intentions and he also did not respond.

 

This means that my car was no longer registered with the DVLA and was my own private and personal property.

 

By law I like all of us have the right to travel freely on the land without levy or penalty being imposed on me.

This is a little known fact one which the government would like to remain so

(the government DO NOT own the roads they are merely acting as guardians for what belongs to all of us).

 

On Saturday my private conveyance was stolen (taken without my consent) by a tow truck driver operating under the request of two policy officers.

The officers therefore were aiding and abetting to an Unlawful act.

My conveyance was returned to me on the payment of £150 ransom (the police will call it a release fee although it's also extortion).

 

I know there will be those of you reading this who will say that they had the right to seize my car,

but you unfortunately like the majority of the public need to understand the difference between Common Law and Statutory Law or Corporation Law.

 

We are subject to the law of the land (Common Law) and Statutory Law requires consent.

If you fail to consent to a statutory law then that law has no bearing on you.

 

My conveyance was not registered with DVLA and therefore they have no jurisdiction over what I do with it nor how I use it.

If you register something with a corporation then another corporation tells you that you have to obey their rules even though you have no contract with them would you?

(If Sky sent you a bill for sky tv and you didn't have a contract with them you would refuse to pay them).

 

Remember To travel is a right not a privilege and by attaching a levy to it you are taking away the right.

Don't allow the corporations including government to take away your rights.

 

A man who does not lay claim to his rights has none.

[Conniff]

Oh dear, the nutters are back.

 

I started commenting but stopped as I just can't lower myself to respond to such stupid beliefs.

 

A new member of the David Icke fan club are we.

Edited November 1, 2011 by Conniff

[borisbeaver]

Oh god zzzzzzzzz

[Conniff]

I hope you aren't laughing at him Boris Beaver, our rights are important, we have a 'right' to wear underpants, it's not a privilege, lets stand up for ourselves.

[borisbeaver]

I would never laugh at the afflicted - or member of the David Icke Fan Club:lol:

[watchinginvestigation2011]

[flipperthedolfin]

I notice that all you can do is hurl insults at make assumptions but none of you are prepared to put your reasons as to why. The reason for posting this was to make people aware and to read other peoples views not to read insults. Thank you for taking the time to reply.

[watchinginvestigation2011]

Your getting stressy over nothing !!!!

[Jamberson]

You've got yourself in a mess and it's your own fault.

 

Take a look at your V5 document and on the front you will see in the blue strip near the top THIS IS NOT PROOF OF OWNERSHIP it shows who is responsible for registering and taxing the vehicle.

 

OK, so far so good.

 

Write or contact the DVLA and ask them who owns your car and they will not answer, the reason being that once you register your car with them they take the ownership from you hence the V5 states You are the registered keeper.

 

No they don't. The owner continues to own it after the keeper registers with them. One person owns it, another person (or the same person) is the keeper. That's all.

 

The rest of this nonsense follows from this basic mistake. Why you think DVLA take ownership of it is beyond me - but hey, it's your life and money you're wasting.

[watchinginvestigation2011]

DVLA probably frame letters like op sent and put them up on the notice board !!!!

[flipperthedolfin]

So if someone takes property that belongs to you without your consent is that called theft? If that person then tells you that they will return your property on payment of a sum of money is that not extortion? Is the sum of money not ransom?

[green_and_mean]

My granny is registered blind with the Council does that mean the Council now owns her!!

[watchinginvestigation2011]

My granny is registered blind with the Council does that mean the Council now owns her!!

 

[green_and_mean]

[flipperthedolfin]

No it's the government that owns her or the United Kingdom Corporation to give it it's proper name. That happened when she like you was registered at birth.

[green_and_mean]

Is it a full moon today?

[Jamberson]

OK, I'll try a reasoned argument if you like.

 

So if someone takes property that belongs to you without your consent is that called theft?

 

Only under certain circumstances. There are many situations where something can be taken from you without your consent, but that thing is not being stolen. If you're in posession of a controlled substance for example. Or if the police think something is stolen goods. Or if you own counterfeit goods. Or if you have a dangerous weapon etc etc etc - think of your own examples.

 

If that person then tells you that they will return your property on payment of a sum of money is that not extortion? Is the sum of money not ransom?

 

See above.

 

Also, I am bemused by your assumption that if you register something with an organisation, they assume ownership. Where does that come from? By your logic no-one would be able to sell their own car as they are not the owner! It's ridiculous.

[watchinginvestigation2011]

No it's the government that owns her or the United Kingdom Corporation to give it it's proper name. That happened when she like you was registered at birth.

 

You been taking goerge orwells 1984 a bit too literally?

[flipperthedolfin]

You are obviously not interested in a civilized discussion on matters so I will bid you a fond farewell and hope you get well soon.

[watchinginvestigation2011]

'Doublespeak'

[watchinginvestigation2011]

You are obviously not interested in a civilized discussion on matters so I will bid you a fond farewell and hope you get well soon.

 

 

Thanks xx

[Jamberson]

Well, that was fun. Now back to planet earth again.

[Jamberson]

Is this the fastest thread ever to get onto page 2?

[green_and_mean]

Theft is only 'theft' because of the theft act 1968 a law made up by a corporation you think owns everything anyway, you are just talking rubbish. You think the DVLA are stealing your car? Why is it your car because you gave a shop some bits of paper with a picture of the queeen on? You cannot just use the law and govt when it suits you.

[Jarv1]

Well that brightened up an otherwise dreary day!!