Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Desperate for LU advice please; old_codja and undergroud esp pls


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok, and so what is the worst that can happen now? and also I had a valid oyster card with me that had plenty of credit on it and i then used that to travel with. Looking at the previous posts a lot of people did not have the intention of paying the fare whereas I did and I had the oyster card to prove it

 

You did not have an Oyster that had credit on it which was valid for your use.

 

Your post says that you had your Aunt's Freedom Pass. YOU did not have any ticket.

 

You have been charged with avoiding payment of a fare.

 

The most likely outcome is that you will be convicted and fined by the Magistrates. The maximum fine allowed by law for this is up to £1000, but as this is a first offence the Magistrates will impose a fine at what is known as the 'entry level' and that is around £350 (equal to the estimated average weekly wage). You will also be ordered to pay a £15 'victim surcharge' imposed by the last government on every person fined by a Magistrates Court. You will probably be ordered to pay compensation of the unpaid fare and all or part of the prosecution costs.

 

If you plead guilty the fine will be reduced because the Magistrates will give you credit for owning up and pleading guilty at the first opportunity.

 

If you plead guilty you can expect a fine of around £225, prosecution costs anywhere between £100 - £150, compensation of the fare plus £15 surcharge so a total of around £400.

 

There will be a conviction recorded by the court and this should be declared, but it is not categorised as a serious offence and there is a move afoot to have all such records spent after 12 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi old codja

Hope your well. Sorry if it was misunderstood that although I did accidentally use my aunts freedom pass I did in fact have my own oyster card on me with sufficient credit. It is what I subsequently used to continue my journey

 

 

 

OTE=Old-CodJA;3732098]You did not have an Oyster that had credit on it which was valid for your use.

 

Your post says that you had your Aunt's Freedom Pass. YOU did not have any ticket.

 

You have been charged with avoiding payment of a fare.

 

The most likely outcome is that you will be convicted and fined by the Magistrates. The maximum fine allowed by law for this is up to £1000, but as this is a first offence the Magistrates will impose a fine at what is known as the 'entry level' and that is around £350 (equal to the estimated average weekly wage). You will also be ordered to pay a £15 'victim surcharge' imposed by the last government on every person fined by a Magistrates Court. You will probably be ordered to pay compensation of the unpaid fare and all or part of the prosecution costs.

 

If you plead guilty the fine will be reduced because the Magistrates will give you credit for owning up and pleading guilty at the first opportunity.

 

If you plead guilty you can expect a fine of around £225, prosecution costs anywhere between £100 - £150, compensation of the fare plus £15 surcharge so a total of around £400.

 

There will be a conviction recorded by the court and this should be declared, but it is not categorised as a serious offence and there is a move afoot to have all such records spent after 12 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i doubt it very much

and it will not be retrospective either.

even if it does change

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can the OP answer my question I posted in post #42 please?

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all,

This website is very informative but I am really concerned about the aftermath of what may potentially happen. Is there any way of finding out more info on this such as is the conviction under the ROA 1979? Is there way of getting it expunged or reducing the length of time until it is spent?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all,

This website is very informative but I am really concerned about the aftermath of what may potentially happen. Is there any way of finding out more info on this such as is the conviction under the ROA 1979? Is there way of getting it expunged or reducing the length of time until it is spent?

Many thanks

 

It's a self-help website though, so people have to do their own research as well.

 

Have you tried google? I just did a brief search and there is information out there. Here's a link to the Ministry of Justice's pdf document, for example.

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/guidance/prison-probation-and-rehabilitation/rehaboffenders/rehabilitation-offenders.pdf

 

I hope that helps.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks honeybee, checked out that website it's saying 5 years for a fine!!! That's a bit harsh isn't it?

Would a solicitor have suggestions as to how to better the situation? Or anything anyone can suggest? Surely 5 years is excessive??

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I read 5 years too.

 

I think OC may have mentioned that it might be slightly different, but don't quote me. I hope he or one of the transport people will be along later.

 

Have you actually spoken to any solicitors? I don't know if it would help you or not, but you could phone some firms who are local to the magistrates court where your case is to be heard and see if they deal with this type of case. They should be willing to speak to you for about half an hour for free. That may give you and idea. Or you could try finding your local Community Law people or speak to the CAB.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can see the current legistlation here (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/53/section/5) and the proposed legislation here (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2010-2012/0109/amend/su109-viib.htm). It is currently 5 years for a fine, though this would be reduced to 1 year. The changes would be retrospective. Here is an article on it (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9057643/Hundreds-of-thousands-of-criminals-to-get-clean-slate-in-law-change.html). Although likely to be made into law, this is still a proposal so bear that in mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you justice! That was extremely informative info.

I wonder if it does, when this would take effect?

Do you still think I have a chance to settle out of court?

Many thanks

 

It's difficult for any of us to guess because we don't know the whole story, like how many times you used the card for instance. OC has said in the past that in theory cases can be settled out of court up until the case is heard.

 

But Freedom pass misuse is viewed very seriously. Sadly, many people don't come back to tell us what happens, but I don't remember a Freedom pass case being settled before court.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's difficult for any of us to guess because we don't know the whole story, like how many times you used the card for instance. OC has said in the past that in theory cases can be settled out of court up until the case is heard.

 

But Freedom pass misuse is viewed very seriously. Sadly, many people don't come back to tell us what happens, but I don't remember a Freedom pass case being settled before court.

 

My best, HB

 

 

 

I have asked the OP this question twice on this thread now and he hasn't answered so we can assume it was more than once. In which case I extend my congratulations to the revenue inspector for doing a good job here.

 

Nice to know that these people are getting caught and that our money is going on paying for concessionary travel for those who are not entitled to it. Hopefully the OP will be adequately 'educated' when he goes to court.

 

Please Note

 

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there sailor sam,

I accidentally used it once while having a oyster card with credit, if that's made things any clearer for u.

He who cannot forgive breaks the bridge over which he himself must pass. So sailor sam, no disrespect but i feel there are diplomatic ways of putting things forward to ppl that need help and advice and there shud b a slight human emotional touch there too

For the record I am a professor.

I appreciate all the advice and info and will continue to ask questions and learn things.

Many many thanks to everyone who is advising useful info and the support being given and I'm sure all the other ppl on here feel the same.

May God bless everyone and sailor sam included to be happy and prosperous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more point sailor sam, allowing someone to be convicted means they get a criminal record which then means that they cannot get a job which then means they rely on benefits from the government as they cannot survive and benefits come from YOUR taxes so all in all no one really comes out better off including ppl like yourself who pay taxes and it's reducing economic output that sumone could potentially contribute towards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more point sailor sam, allowing someone to be convicted means they get a criminal record which then means that they cannot get a job which then means they rely on benefits from the government as they cannot survive and benefits come from YOUR taxes so all in all no one really comes out better off including ppl like yourself who pay taxes and it's reducing economic output that sumone could potentially contribute towards

 

If you are stating "criminal record which then means that they cannot get a job", the logical consequence (applying 'reduction ab absurdum', since you have) is that no one should ever be prosecuted. Are you really suggesting this?

 

Having a criminal record may make it harder to get a job, or preclude the convicted person from some jobs : the potential employer should know of the conviction (if not spent, or for a job where the conviction must be revealed even if otherwise 'spent'). The employer can then decide if the conviction is a bar to an offer of employment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

Is it better to email or telephone or write to try to resolve te situation?

Does anyone know that if you plead not guilty within what time frame the court date would be adjourned?

Many thanks

It would be better to write a letter, in my opinion, although as others have said, I believe you would be unlikely to succeed as misuse of Freedom passes is one of the most serious offences. If you plead not guilty then the case is likely to be adjourned for a date between 4 and 10 weeks later. If you are looking to settle out of court, then you would be advised to attend your court date to enter a plea of not guilty in person. This would give you the greatest amount of time to try to reach a settlement. If you do take this course of action but are later found guilty, you would get a somewhat increased sentence.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...