Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiff fees for parking fines and magistrates court fines


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

My other half has an outstanding magistrates fine for keeping a vehicle on a public road without road tax. Someone attended his previous address as he has not paid this. They were from Marstons and seemed to be quoting a much higher sum than the court paperwork we have states. Would they have been certified bailiffs or CEOs?

 

He now lives in our house, although much of the possessions were bought by me or for me by my family. The person who attended was given our address but they have not visited yet, this was some weeks ago now. Do they have the power to force the front door and take things? What can I do to avoid this? I really need advice I am pregnant and its another in the long line of things stressing me out causing me sleepless nights :( We have no money so I cant just pay it outright and have little spare money.

 

Thanks

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My other half has an outstanding magistrates fine for keeping a vehicle on a public road without road tax. Someone attended his previous address as he has not paid this. They were from Marstons and seemed to be quoting a much higher sum than the court paperwork we have states. Would they have been certified bailiffs or CEOs?

 

He now lives in our house, although much of the possessions were bought by me or for me by my family. The person who attended was given our address but they have not visited yet, this was some weeks ago now. Do they have the power to force the front door and take things? What can I do to avoid this? I really need advice I am pregnant and its another in the long line of things stressing me out causing me sleepless nights :( We have no money so I cant just pay it outright and have little spare money.

 

Thanks

 

x

 

If your partner had not received a summons concerning this fine then it is a simple matter for him to complete a Statutory Declaration which needs to be sent to the court that imposed the fine. He has a strict time limit of 21 days to file this !!

 

This will CANCEL the fine and all bailiff charges are removed.

 

The Marston Group bailiff has a contract with HMCS that provides that he can charge a letter fee of £50 and a visit fee of £175 !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think he would have ever received the summons as the van was seen outside the front of my house with no road tax as he has just moved ther

e and hadnt had a chance to change the registered address.

 

 

He got rid of the van about 2 weeks after and thought no more of it.

His previous address was his mums house and they were not speaking so he would not have got any post sent there.

 

 

This was all in June 2008 the van was caught with no tax.

I would assume the summons and court date were some time after that.

We only know about the letter from Marstons because his brother got it before his mother had time to.

 

 

The same for the bailiff visit, his brother spoke to them through a window after his mother told them to do one but they would not say who they were.

He had to prove he was not my other half as they did not believe him.

 

Do they have to apply to the court for anything to go to a different address?

 

Also, one more thing..

.. i have just found out is he did not actually get rid of the van he parked it off road in his mates yard.

 

 

His mate needed to move some of his trucks and parked it on the road for a couple of hours (great) in which time it was towed.

 

 

Other half was told his van had been crushed,

I have just looked on DVLA Vehicle checker and the damn thing is taxed until 01/12/09

so how is this

 

 

He was not given sufficient opportunity to claim it back!?

Where has the money gone as they obv sold it?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

I am currently off work on maternity leave and today a notice came through the letter box titled "Removal Notice" and requesting my OH contact them urgently. We have no money to pay the sum they are demanding :( and I dont know what to do. I am heavily pregnant and am scared they will come back when I am in the house alone. The fine is a magistrates court fine for motor offences I believe.

 

Is there anything that can be done? What should I get him to do?

 

Thanks

 

stressed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please hang on in there, one of the excellent people on here will advise you very soon I'm sure. Have a look at other threads on here for advice too. The caggers on here have helped us a great deal with the Marston bully bailiff problem we are going through :).

We are by no means experts although there is one bit of advice we can give DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR TO THEM and if you have a car, park it away from your property for the time being.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think OH went to court i thought he had paid it but doesnt look like he did :( waiting for him to come home. do they have to take into account vunerable catagories with magistrates fines?

 

I do not want to appear to be critical but this information is also aimed at others that may be reading this post.

 

When a fine is imposed by the Magistrates Court, unlike council tax arrears and unpaid parking tickets, the Court will accept payment arrangements on a nominal basis. Despite this, nearly one million such fines have been passed to Marston Group & Philips to enforce. This is such a shame because as long as you keep the court aware of your circumstances they are fine.

 

If the fine remains unpaid, then a Distress Warrant is issued and this will involve a letter fee of £75 together with a visit fee of £175 !!!

 

If the debtor had not received a summons ( this is very common indeed) then he can file a simple Statutory Declaration and the debt and bailiff fees will be cancelled.

 

If the debtor has already had to pay the bailiff, then he has 21 days in which to file a Statutory Declaration and the court will refund the amount of the fine and the bailiff company must refund the fees.

 

It is almost impossible to get the court to recall the Distress Warrant. HOWEVER...the contract does provide for "vulnerable cases" such as yours and I am fairly confident that Marston will return the Warrant on these grounds. If, not they should be able to agree to accept payments spread over a maximum of 6 months.

 

I have sent you a PM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to keep you updated

got home yesterday to find 2 notices,

 

 

one was a "Final Notice" and

the other an A5 leaflet completed which told me if payment was not made within 7 day

s he would be re-attending with a locksmith to force entry.

 

 

Being very heavily pregnant and suffering a number of health problems since a car accident in December which I am now seeing a neurologist for

I really dont need this.

Am barely able to read or use computers at the mo so please accept my apologies for the delay responding :)

AND no this is not an excuse.

 

The majority of the possessions in the house were bought for ME by my family or bought by me.

It is my other half whos fine it is but it seems if they do as they threaten it will be me that loses out when they take my things!

Edited by stressed2009
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to keep you updated got home yesterday to find 2 notices, one was a "Final Notice" and the other an A5 leaflet completed which told me if payment was not made within 7 days he would be re-attending with a locksmith to force entry. Being very heavily pregnant and suffering a number of health problems since a car accident in December which I am now seeing a neurologist for I really dont need this. Am barely able to read or use computers at the mo so please accept my apologies for the delay responding :) AND no this is not an excuse.

 

The majority of the possessions in the house were bought for ME by my family or bought by me. It is my other half whos fine it is but it seems if they do as they threaten it will be me that loses out when they take my things!

 

I gather you have not seen the said "gentleman" in person - if that is the case then he will have no idea of your present situation. It will probably pay you to sent an email pointing out your present situation to the Company concerned and ask that in view of this they should hold off any further action and return the case to Court. However it may be because the fine is in your OH name they may disregard this and wait for him to inform them - in this case it may be better for you both to do it.

 

Normal vulnerable situations need some form of proof but as you cannot hide yours it should be plain enough for them. He cannot however just turn up and break in. Possibly the Court should be appraised of your circumstances.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to give him a call in a minute to explain the circumstances and have already spoken to their main office to get an email address so I can put it in writing as well. My OH is going to call them as soon as he gets a chance to confirm things.

 

I did try speaking to the fines and enforcement unit but they refused to have anything to do with it despite the circumstances and insisted I must speak to the CEO as they have passed it on and will not have anything to do with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to give him a call in a minute to explain the circumstances and have already spoken to their main office to get an email address so I can put it in writing as well. My OH is going to call them as soon as he gets a chance to confirm things.

 

Only call tem if you can record the call, strangely they have selective memory when it boils down to he said you said. Email addresses should be available from their website.

 

I did try speaking to the fines and enforcement unit but they refused to have anything to do with it despite the circumstances and insisted I must speak to the CEO as they have passed it on and will not have anything to do with it.

 

Could well be it is the Court manager you need to speak to, preferably in person.

 

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

I need some advice, a note has been posted through our door for my partner.

 

 

It appears to be from HMCS and says "A warrant exists for your immediate arrest. To avoid being held in custody you should contact...

... If you do not contact this officer the warrant will be passed to the police"

 

I know my partner has missed a payment as he did not have the money to pay.

 

 

What should we do now?

 

 

Is this a bailiff company on behalf of the court?

Thanks

Stressed2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

might also be worth contacting hmcs or the courts to clarify if it is a genuine warrant and not a ploy to put the frighteners on your partner

was the missed payment a court order/fine or ccj???

if so they dont normally go straight for a warrant. speaking from personal experience, i have a fine that i didnt pay for 12 months firstly because the courts changed how they handled continual payments but then cos i didnt want to pay/have the money to pay, they sent a couple of reminders then sent a final notice of issueing a warrant.

i contacted them and set up the payments again and have not heard from them since

Edited by wackyone
Link to post
Share on other sites

The fine is a court fine for a motoring offence he has so far paid off almost half of original balance.

 

 

It is a genuine warrant, they say my partner has to pay half and rest within 4 weeks or surrender himself to court.

 

 

They will not reset up payment plan they say installments would have to be agreed by the court once he surrenders himself.

Are the police really going to come arrest him for the 200odd that's outstanding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fine is a court fine for a motoring offence he has so far paid off almost half of original balance. It is a genuine warrant, they say my partner has to pay half and rest within 4 weeks or surrender himself to court. They will not reset up payment plan they say installments would have to be agreed by the court once he surrenders himself. Are the police really going to come arrest him for the 200odd that's outstanding?

 

Yes he we be arrested and probably just bailed to appear before the magistrates again, they are unlikely to hold him overnight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fine is a court fine for a motoring offence he has so far paid off almost half of original balance. It is a genuine warrant, they say my partner has to pay half and rest within 4 weeks or surrender himself to court. They will not reset up payment plan they say installments would have to be agreed by the court once he surrenders himself. Are the police really going to come arrest him for the 200odd that's outstanding?

 

There are two companies under Contract with HMCS to enforce unapid magistrate court fines. These are Marston Group and Philips Ltd (sorry there is also Swift and Excel in Wales).

 

Is the letter that you received from either of these companies or is it from the court itself?

 

It is vital that you do not "keep your head in the sand" and that you pick up the phone to speak to the person responsible for this letter.

 

I do not want to frighten you but, courts do arrest people for missing a payment of a fine. This is to send a strict warning that unpaid fines are a very serious matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the letter was from the court as it was on HMCS headed paper although hand delivered. Before my OH had a chance to phone the person named on the letter this morning, he actually contacted him so OH has now agreed to pay half Friday and the rest within 4 weeks. We cant really afford that but OH cant afford to take time off to go to court either as he is self employed he would lose out on a days wages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the fine which is made up can be made to go out your bank via standing order, less hassle if you know you can get arrested if you miss a payment.

The other thing you can do is to phone your local court and arrange a payment plan, they should inform you what times they are open from. You will then need to gis o in and show them you havent got the cash and what you are willing to pay and if need be that you need longer.

You will then be taken to the Judge who will slam his hammer and that will be the new order. Doesnt take to long, can be done on your own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...