Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can a DCA charge interest?


hatesdebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4496 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They can IMHO can only charge interest after the purchase of the debt

if the original agreement specifies that it can be charged.

 

Hi,

 

Surely though..you made an agreement with the original creditor...so once it is 'sold' the agreement is terminated....full stop.

 

They can't have their cake and eat it..It's either their debt...

 

OR

 

they sell the debt...and no more agreement..hence no more charges...that is the final value that is owed.

 

At no point have you signed an 'agreement' with the new owner...

 

Regards,

Stormski

Edited by stormski
bad english
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They sell the whole thing the rights benefits and obligations

of the original agreement, or simply they owned it now some one else

dooes.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so most of these accounts seem to

be sold off at the default date without

termination.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consequence of amendments to CCA 2006 at chapter 14

 

http://origin-www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/14/pdfs/ukpga_20060014_en.pdf

 

s.86D [page 13 of the above link/pdf] 'failure to give notice of sums in arears' and apparent creditor 'penalty' for non compliance.

 

The OP would need to decide [based on correspondence with the DCA] whether default of s.86 was probable or could be evidenced

 

Note, reference to 'owner'...... a DCA short of assignment [full legal title] would not fall into owner category.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, should have said........ in essence, you need to question everything: assignment, assignment date, previous correspondence, previous DCA [if any] value [if any] of default fees [simple interest from day 29 only] etc etc.

 

Its long winded and hard work at times but if you ever get to sit in a court room you'll want all the ammo [stand down Brig, and apologies for earlier curt response :-) ] available to you

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm just gathering info on all of this and learning as i go along..i don't think most of it will apply to my girlfriend as her debts are relatively small...( few k )...

 

I'm working on the reclaiming charges ( apart from overdraft ) and will be paying off the 'real debt' asap to give her a clean slate ( even if the CRA's look like they're riddled with bullet holes ).

 

Vodaphone sorted....next step...Halifax credit card....

 

Once these are all sorted..i will be hanging around here trying to help out with any info i have learned from all the great information from other peeps on the site.

 

Regards,

Stormski

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears to matter not, the

business practices of the creditor/ DCA / debt purchaser

are it seems irrelevant, they have a property they get

a tax benefit and sell the obligation/benefit on, and

round and round it goes.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears to matter not, the

business practices of the creditor/ DCA / debt purchaser

are it seems irrelevant, they have a property they get

a tax benefit and sell the obligation/benefit on, and

round and round it goes.

 

Hi,

 

So what happens if the account is Terminated....and then sold on...and they still try to use the 'original agreement'

 

Surely this isn't legal as the agreement has been terminated already....but the debt remains...

 

Regards,

Stormski

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears to matter not, the

business practices of the creditor/ DCA / debt purchaser

are it seems irrelevant, they have a property they get

a tax benefit and sell the obligation/benefit on, and

round and round it goes.

 

should this tax benefit be taken into account with the original amount on a debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe a good question to ask the county court judge if and when the time arrives:madgrin:

 

A DJ will have no interest in a companies output tax, focus must be on the facts at hand and poc....... depending on value and Cpr regime this will have to be argued on probability or evidenced.

 

gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a dca has not sent a notice of default sums as to s.86

be it they can or cannot charge interest

 

any interest would be unenforceable

 

Hi,

 

That bit...can you explain what you mean...in quite a bit more detail in laymen terms so that people can understand ( that does mean me too! )

 

Regards,

Stormski

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stormski

 

Its in my link in earlier post, have a good read of s.86, It details when an owner/creditor MUST give notice of sums in arrears and defaults, it also details maximum/minimum period of notice [fixed and running credit] along with penalty if they do not comply. In basic terms, no statement at month 6, no encumbering of interest [rolling 6 months]

 

It is highly unlikely that a DCA has full legal title [ever], most, if pressed in litigation will present an undertaking from the OC rather than attempt to evidence assignment.

 

Simple interest on default is also effective, hence you will often see claims on Cag where a DCA will err on the side of caution and try to apply simple interest from day 1 if they are unsure or cannot evidence default fees/dates and their impact on total balance.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Excellent thread and question . And one people prob wonder about. Espec if according to Brig creditors are selling 'live' accounts on token payments to DCA's who can add interest if agreement allows it. . Peeps won't stand a cat's chance to ever get out of debt. Ex they repay £2 and the DCA adds £20 interest every month.

 

Could people use BCOB legislation against the original creditor in a case like this ? Creditor obv knows person's in financial difficutly if they're making token payments. Instead of treating them fairly they've put the person into spiralling debt by selling the account to a DCA with further interest allowed. Ber they get more money from the DCA for this type of account then.

 

How would a T&C which allows further interest be worded. Crapbot just use ' account can sold without prior notice etc to a 3rd party' to try and justify doing it. Never been able to get full set or correct T&Cs using either a SAR and CCA request to orig cred or the DCA.

 

Thought defaulted accounts couldn't have further interest added. So Re - if a T&C does allow interest after default it can't be more than interest rate stated in original agreement. How does that work with a credit card, as terms would say interest rate can be varied? Would it be the last interest rate in use jsut before sale?

 

Sorry for the questions, just trying to understand this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO if an OC 'or' a DCA demands payment in full, then that terminates the agreement you originally signed with the OC.

 

Therefore NO interest or charges can be added as NO agreement exists for them to do so, until, if ever, it goes to court and then stat % is applied by the DJ.

 

The process of agreements is that, when you fail to make the agreed payment, you enter a default period,

the creditor then issues a DN and explains how you can rectify said default,

you fail to rectify the default in the manner they have outlined, and then in accordance with the DN,

the account is terminated, so once the account is terminated, it no longer exists, so even if the T&C's state

that interest will still be charged, HOW are they going to do that when no agreement exists?

 

I may be wrong, but I'm pretty confident I'm in the right ball park...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing..as i'm in this position with Cabot..they have been adding interest at approx £100 per month and my debt has increased loads...with no chance of me ever repaying as unemployed with a disability which means finding work (especially in the present economic climate) is virtually impossible. I offered a 10% f&f which somebody in the family would have lent me, but it was turned down with them saying they'd only accept what amounted to approx 70% of an outstanding balance which is £1200 more now than when they bought it...(bangs head against wall!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...