Jump to content

hatesdebt

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About hatesdebt

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi Cleo, Was there any particular letter / wording used that made them give this reply?
  2. It's actually up to Cabot to chase City for a copy of your original agreement, not you. But, I'd be inclined to cca City themselves anyway. Reason being, they will almost certainly not have the agreement, and they quite often state as such in writing. Once you have this in writing, you can smugly wave a copy under Cabot's nose. The recon may comply with the sec 78 request, but to enforce the debt - NO, so all they can really do is the usual willy waving....
  3. Don't take me at 100% on this though Gail. The problem is, all legislation is written in the usual gobblygook rubbish and therefore hard to decipher, but that's the way I see it. If the sec 130 notices do apply in Scotland (and I "think" they do), as they have not been issued, they have lost all rights to either charge or claim the pji anyway.
  4. If a lender applies for pji, a judge can grant it at their discretion and it will be stated on the judgment. The point is, it doesn't merge with the judgment debt and has to accrue separately. So, if the judgment for example says judgment amount of £5k + interest, you only need to pay £5k to clear the judgment. They were granted the pji yes, but as it does not merge and form part of, they need to bring separate proceedings to claim it. Anyone else?...
  5. Hmm, I can't find anything that says sec 130a does not apply in Scotland - unless anyone knows different. In any event, it states quite clearly in the original terms that the interest shall not merge. This means it cannot form part of the judgment debt and other proceedings have to be brought. Personally, I'm still of the view that all you had to pay Link was the outstanding balance of the the judgment amount at the time. This I believe was around £2224
  6. Gail, Look back at posts 29,66 and 71. Your extract from the terms state that the interest does not merge with the judgement amount. As I said, this means the pji accrues separately and the owner of the debt has to take you back to court with a completely separate action to recover the same. Link can't just make things up as they go along. They need to substantiate their right to claim additional interest. As far as I see it, they had no legal standing or lawful right to demand the extra interest. They have to be able to PROVE they were able to lawfully do so. Also, no
  7. Another nail in the coffin then - LOL!! I'm off now, but will keep an eye on the thread. You could also send a pm to a member called "ford" - he's pretty good at this pji stuff. Ask him if he can be kind enough to look in on the thread.
  8. Gail, Look at post #71 - did you ever receive such notices? Anyway, We may as well leave this now until you get a reply from your letter sending on Monday and see what the sar turns up. Otherwise it's guesswork. Anyway, I need a glass of wine and a fag......
  9. I don't agree DX, If we can prove that Link had no right to those extra funds, then a claim could be brought, be the conversation be by phone or otherwise. No court would believe that someone would just willy nilly hand over all that extra money without being coerced in some way. Oh BTW, Regarding sec 130a notices....... "Once the CCJ is in place, your creditor must send you a notice to say they intend to charge interest on the judgment. They are not allowed to add interest until they have sent the first notice to you. The notice must tell you the outstanding balance on whic
  10. Hi Gail, Yep, that's exactly what I meant. We need to see what turns up, but I think Link are stuffed on this tbh.......
  11. Absolutely, it needs to be in the original terms. Not only that, but it can't be claimed unless protocol is followed such as the sec 130 notices for example. Recently, it also has to be stated on the default notice as well....
  12. Gail, Do as DX says and ask about the decree. At the same time, tell them you require a copy of the documentation / legislation upon which they have relied to charge such interest. If they can't supply such documentation, or what they send is rubbish, they could be dead in the water should you bring a claim. After all, that is what they would have to rely upon in court. Do it tmrw / Monday..... We'll also wait and see what the SAR turns up.. .....All of the above in writing - don't call them.
  13. I think I'd stop worrying atm and see what the SAR turns up. We can go from there.....
  14. Don't worry about that. All that really says is that creditors can go for pji if they wish and is not necessarily deemed an unfair contract term. Collecting it is another matter entirely....
×
×
  • Create New...