Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax are we at fault?


areweatfault
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone! I am new here and would really appreciate your knowledge and a moment of your time please.

 

On Feb 5th 2010 my wife and I made a claim for council tax benefit. I receive contribution based ESA (which is non means tested so our savings don’t count in calculations) and my wife works part time 10 hours a week. We get child benefit for our son and some child tax credits.

 

We handed in ALL the information we had on the above income and were asked to provide bank statements which we said we would organise. On the 8th Feb 2010 three days later we got our council tax award and thought no more about it. We assumed the council had decided we were entitled to benefit.

 

Two weeks ago we had an issue with our son’s school meals and wrote to the council and our MP about it. We got a response quite quickly and interestingly in the letter the council also informed us that they had our council tax claim down as ESA income based but had now changed that to the correct benefit of ESA contribution based (how they made that mistake is beyond us as it stated contribution based on my ESA award letter that I showed them back in Feb 2010)

 

They also apologies for their error and acknowledge that they did ask us for statements in Feb 10 but did not pursue the request due to ‘lack of clarity of our benefit type’ and have now asked us to provide two recent consecutive bank statements for all accounts including savings.

 

Well, we got ALL our bank statements together and went down to the office and handed them in as we were requested to do. We are now concerned that we may be accused of hiding savings which will result in a large overpayment even thought we never gave them any misleading info when we made our claim in Feb 2010.

 

As our main benefit of contribution based ESA is non means tested and we are allowed any amount of savings, all this time we assumed that the council did not peruse any statements in Feb 10 because of this fact. We have never claimed council tax before so don’t know how it works etc.

 

If an overpayment is proved and we are not entitled to the benefit, then we want to pay it back in full even if it is their fault. Can they say we should have known that our benefit was given in error? Or can we claim that they made an ‘official error’ to which we as the claimants did not contribute?

 

Thank you so much you wonderful people who help on this forum!

Edited by areweatfault
Link to post
Share on other sites

the basic rule is that all overpayments of council tax benefit are recoverable

 

there is an exception where the following 3 conditions are met

 

1) there was an offical error made by the council, dwp or hmrc

2) you did not contribute to the error

3) you could not reasonably have been aware you were being overpaid

 

the questions that need to be asked are

1) why did the council assess your claim as esa(ir) instead of esa(cb)?

2) when you completed your claim form, did you state you were in receipt of contribution based ESA? or did you just state ESA?

 

if you provided your letter stating contribution based, then i would expect you to pass the first 2 tests, so it just leaves the third test

3) did your notification letters state your council tax benefit was based upon income related esa or just state esa?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi id6052 thanks for replying, much appreciated.

 

1: We have no idea why they assessed our claim as esa(ir) instead of esa(cb) but you ask a good question there!

2: When we made our claim we said we were in receipt of ESA and handed them our most recent ESA award which states very clearly it is contribution based. They photocopied all our evidence of income so it is surprising they made a mistake about what type of ESA it was.

3: Our notification letter back from them does clearly state that they are basing our claim on income related ESA.

 

Does any of this come to an exception?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem i can potentially see is the notification letters, some councils may argue that you could reasonably have been aware that you were being overpaid as the award notices state that your benefit has been assessed based upon income related ESA, other councils will simply accept it was their fault and not recover the overpayment.

 

I think at this stage, the best thing to do is wait for the council to reassess your benefit and then see if they are going to recover or write off any overpayment.

 

Let us know the decision and we can advise you further. It sounds like you have reasonable grounds for appealing if they decide to recover.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice and I will let you know what they decide. We are now concerned that we may be accused of hiding savings which will result in an over-payment even thought, we never gave them any misleading info when we made our claim in Feb 2010. They just never gave us a chance to hand in our statements before they awarded our benefit. Is it normal practice for them to not wait and award benefit before they have the bank statements and any other info they ask for in their system and calculated, and then not stop the benefit if they don't get this info? We don't want benefit we are not entitled to but we also don't want to be seen as trying to cheat them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a person is in receipt of an income related/income based benefit, they very rarely need to see bank statements, as any capital would have been taken into account by DWP already

 

even where a person is not in receipt of an income related/income based benefit, the council can choose to assess benefit based upon capital declared on claim form, without waiting for bank statements

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a person is in receipt of an income related/income based benefit, they very rarely need to see bank statements, as any capital would have been taken into account by DWP already

 

Does that mean that if the DWP are not taking our savings into account as they are non means tested then the council will do the same? I am slightly confused by your answer :-)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a person is getting a means tested benefit from dwp, the dwp take into capital and the council doesnt (because the dwp already has)

 

if a person is NOT receiving a means tested benefit from DWP (as in your case), the dwp do not take capital in account, however the council does take it into account

 

this is to avoid people getting penalised twice for having capital

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

out of interest, how much capital are you talking about?

 

if it is less than £6k, it is disregarded

 

if it is more than £16k, it extinguishes any entitlement

 

if between £6k and £16k, you are treated as having £1 income for every £250 (or part of) above £6k

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh heck, so non means tested capital is treated as means tested capital for CTB! I did not know that I thought that as we are in receipt of a non means tested benefit that it would not be taken into account as they just paid our award. Although if they had waited for our bank statements we would of known as they would of told us we were not eligible for a full rebate as our capital at the time of our CTB claim was about 10-13k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At that level of capital, you would be treated as having £16 to £28 income from capital for council tax benefit purposes.

 

In additions they will take into account your other income for the means test. E.g. your esa, wife's earnings and child tax credit (child benefit is disregarded for council tax benefit purposes).

 

A lot of council's have benefits calculators on their website, which would give you an estimate of what your entitlement should be.

 

If you cant find one on your council's website, you could try: -

 

http://www.turn2us.org.uk/benefits_search.aspx

 

I have not tried that one, just found it by googling for "council tax benefit calculator", you could try the same adding your council's name to the search.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...