Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
    • Thanks Dave, that all sounds clear to me. In terms of avoiding PCNs, I'm not sure if I can. I need to be able to park in that spot, especially as I've got kids to lug forth and back for the school run. Likewise it's not always possible to use the MA's permit system either, as I've not always got them to hand. So, if I'm actively avoiding PCNs, then it could mean I've given in to their idiotic rules. But, I do get what you're saying, as I imagine the risks go up if they claim there are multiple PCNs to be paid at court. Not sure what to do with this one.
    • Is it possible you could qualify for a DRO (Debt Relief Order) and ditch the IVA ? https://debtcamel.co.uk/end-iva-change-to-dro/  
    • My IVA which I began in 2021 has for around a year now been passed to credit expert - I find this company and it's staff obnoxious and insensitive money grabbing monsters.  What is my legal right can I have my IVA moved to another ip what happens if Hanover sell my file?  I am ina real bad situation where my kids are unwell and this crest expert supervisor is saying I should try more than what I agreed despite my situation being very bad and kids unwell.   I feel like they are bullying me and I duh I where to turn.  I keep getting emails saying we at credit expert are in charge of your iva now but still I got messages about my review annual from Hanover which I sent documents and now I got a response from credit expert saying they think I agreed to pay more - how ludicrous is that how can I keep these bullies at bay.   Who can I complain too without messing up my IVA.  I'm going to post below what they sent me please someone help me as they are making me suicidal now. These evil people g coincidently all Indians with weak English which is another issue as communication feels like a battle each time.    Good afternoon,   We hope you are keeping well.   In accordance with the terms of your voluntary arrangement you a required to comply with the following modification:   The debtor must seek to either obtain full time employment or improve self employed income to equivalent thereof as soon as possible and a full review of the debtor’s income and expenditure must be undertaken by the supervisor. The contributions shall increase after taking into account any increased costs in respect of travel and should commence in the month following the review. If any instances of co-habitation with the debtor by any person aged 18 or over occur during the term of this arrangement and where there is reasonable expectation that board and lodging should be paid, the contribution will be added into this arrangement in full. The debtor agrees to provide an income and expenditure review in the month following any loss of child related income. Any surplus identified is to be made available immediately for the benefit of unsecured creditors in the arrangement.    In order to ensure that the terms of the voluntary arrangement are adhered to, I require you to provide evidence that you complies with the above modification along with any supporting evidence.   Alternatively, if you believe you are no longer able to comply with the modification please do inform us.   I eagerly await your response to the points raised within 14 days of the date of this email.   If you have any further queries, please contact Customer Service on ‪0800 0431 431‬ or by email at [email protected].   Thank you for your comprehension.   Plese guys advice me what I can reply as I don't have any more money for these thieves and their annual review is an annual monster nightmare how can I tell them I'm not willing to be bullied and can't paid more    تھا ks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Indesit Washer/Dryer bought from Currys


squirt72
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First time here so please be kind :-)

 

I bought a new washer dryer from Currys in January. It broke down in March and was repaired by Indesit. It broke down last week and was repaired this Tuesday and it has now broken down again today!! :mad2:

 

Indesit won't replace the machine as they say they have to repair under the terms of their warranty, which is so irritating as it is very inconvenient and why should I have it repaired again when the last time it broke down within 48 hours of being repaired.

 

Should Curry's be responsible as they sold me the machine?

 

I'm lost as to what to do and getting increasingly angry with what I perceive to being fobbed off!

 

Thanks in advance for any advice :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have them bang to rights, demand a new washer dryer under the sale of goods act (SOGA) if they fail to replace the faulty item, report them to trading standards, jobs a goodun!

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/sogahome/;jsessionid=A5549D9C677C400EBACB5A822418256D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have them bang to rights, demand a new washer dryer under the sale of goods act (SOGA) if they fail to replace the faulty item, report them to trading standards, jobs a goodun!

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/sogahome/;jsessionid=A5549D9C677C400EBACB5A822418256D

 

And of course it is the retailer you are going for

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its currys that you bought it from your contract is with them

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i've just spoken to Currys and they are saying i need to speak to the manufacturer (Indesit) to get an uplift number before they will replace the machine...gggrrrrrrr!!!! I'm getting increasingly angry. Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what curry are saying is they wont replace it unless the manufacture authroise them to.

 

Under the Sales of Goods Act (SAG) the goods have to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose .... which you would say the goods are not

 

So the item is faulty. You first have to prove to the store that you bought the item from them.

Secondly If you are returning the item within what would be considered a reasonable time for you to have inspected the goods. You are entitled to a full refund or, if you prefer, you can ask for a repair or replacement.

 

The store may try to claim that you have had the goods for 9 months and thefore have had enouugh time to inspect the goods and reject them. Therefore you have accepted the item so can no longer demand a full refund but you may be entitled to a repair of replacement.

 

So far you have had 3 or 4 repairs is it diferant fualts or the same thing?

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what curry are saying is they wont replace it unless the manufacture authroise them to.

 

Under the Sales of Goods Act (SAG) the goods have to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose .... which you would say the goods are not

 

So the item is faulty. You first have to prove to the store that you bought the item from them.

Secondly If you are returning the item within what would be considered a reasonable time for you to have inspected the goods. You are entitled to a full refund or, if you prefer, you can ask for a repair or replacement.

 

The store may try to claim that you have had the goods for 9 months and thefore have had enouugh time to inspect the goods and reject them. Therefore you have accepted the item so can no longer demand a full refund but you may be entitled to a repair of replacement.

 

So far you have had 3 or 4 repairs is it diferant fualts or the same thing?

 

Hi

 

Valid points of course but it matters not whether they were different faults or whether the OP has had it for 9 months or what the retailer says about contacting the manufacturer.

 

This piece of crap has been repaired a number of times and is unfit for purpose. simples.

 

Uplift number????? what a load of nuts.

 

Go in hard...formal complaint to Currys together with an lba saying that if they don't replace the machine within 7 days you will issue in court and seek damages at the courts discretion. You can hand deliver it to the store you purchased from and get them to sign for it as well.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have not read the replies so apologies if I tread on anyone's toes or go over old ground..

 

BUT!!!!

The manufacturer IS NOT LIABLE it is DEFINITELY CURRY'S!

 

Demand to speak to the manager, in fact go into the store, and then demand to speak with the manager, TELL him that you want the item replaced, it has been faulty from the very beginning, it had been repaired and has again failed, you DO NOT want a repair, you WANT a replacement, what is he going to do about it??

 

I have no idea where your local TS is but find it here...http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/extra/contact.cfm?frmAlias=/contact/ although it will be consumer direct I think you will get through too, keep the number in your phone, if the manager gives you any flannel less for "Yes we will send you a replacement this PM" then ring TS or CD in store and report the matter.

 

They MUST replace the item, there is no ifs buts or maybe, it is clearly faulty, and it has been from the outset.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...