Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cash Genie Claim Form


SoldierOn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I know I shouldn't have got involved with payday loans, but I did, I regret it and now I'm paying for it- please don't keep reminding me how stupid I am!

 

Cashgenie have issued against me, the original amount being £195 inc interest, the claim for over £1000!

 

What should I do?! Do I have any grounds to defend the claim?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim

Fixed loan agreement

 

Date Description Amount Due Date

 

16/08/2011 Deposited 150.00 16/08/2011

16/08/2011 Charges 182.00 16/08/2011

16/08/2011 Interest 630.00 16/08/2011

 

Total due:- 0.00

The claimant claims the u, of 962.00 for fixed loan agreement

 

 

 

I contacted Cash Genie yesterday for the agreement and a statement, they asked if I wanted to make an offer... I typed up a letter, titled "Offer made entirely without prejudice or admission" a I wa advised to do so, my offer was to repay £195 (the original £150 + £45 interest), over the next 6 months. My offer was rejected with the following:

 

"Hello ******,

 

Unfortunately your offer is unacceptable and will not be accepted on the basis that the amount is too low.

 

All charges and interest accrued on the account were agreed by you should you enter a state of default upon signing the Consumer Credit Agreement which is a legally binding agreement."

 

My issue is that I contacted them and there DCA Carter Forbes in July explaining I was struggling and would they accept token payments until I start work for HM Armed Forces in November, neither of them replied. Now they won't negotiate, I really could do without judgement being entered and feel I have tried to negotiate yet they haven't- is there anyway the judge would accept this and not enter judgement?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, date of claim 17th Aug

 

The claimant is Cash Genie UK Limited, although Cash Genie said in an e-mail yesterday they have instructed are Douglas Wemyss Solicitors LLP. I've never heard anything from these though

Link to post
Share on other sites

KEPP TRYING TO WORK IT OUT

WE HAVE UNTIL THE 31 AUG TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE CLAIM

 

SEND THIS BY RECORDED DELIVERY TOMOROW TO DOUGLAS WEMYSS (SOLICITORS) WITH A COPY OF THE CLAIM

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) county court[

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of the documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 The Agreement. A copy of the signed, executed Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the signed originals should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract, both at inception and as amended, should also be attached.

 

2 The Default Notice - a true copy of the Default Notice, and /or a copy of the relevant communications log showing issuance, plus proof and method of posting.

 

3 A full statement of account showing how the amount claimed is calculated

 

 

Please ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the documents I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter, in compliance with CPR 31.15(b).

Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 requests.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

FILL IN YOUR DETAILS AND CLAIM NUMBER AT THE TOP

 

REMEMBER

 

RECORDED DLIVERY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made any payments towards this debt, if so list them down and put all your correspondence in order.

 

Sending a CPR to them for the agreement is a waste of time IMHO, I've helped lots of CAGGERs beat this lot with simple defences rather than a properly particularlised defence.

 

Basic defence for this is as follows

 

I xxx am a litigant in person with no recourse to professional legal advice. All costs should be kept to a minimum and mediation is the preferred method in dealing with this vexatious and litigatious claim.

 

On xxx date I borrowed xxx from xxx company, being a payday loan company. Section 87 of the CCA Act applies so default notices are not needed as the original loan was for xxx days. The company deposited xxx into my bank account, NOT the xxx they claimed as xxx was taken for 'fees'.

 

List any payments made here (rollover fees)

 

On xxx date I started corresponding with them as I had financial problems, the correspondence trail is listed below. At no time did I state I was NOT paying them back.

 

List correspondence trail.

 

The company continue to refuse to come to an agreement and insist their fees are legal and valid as they form part of the terms and conditions. UTTCR applies here.... depending on what you are counter arguing.

 

I believe I am only liable to repay xxx being the original loan amount and one months interest - and have already repaid monies stated above.

 

I believe this needs to go to mediation to allow the company to prove their fees and added charges are just and reasonably reflect the work involved in recovering this short term high interest loan.

 

This is a statement of truth by xxxx

 

That is it, keep it simple and try to keep out the 'legal' stuff as you won't be able to counter argue in court, simply sending in a defence is enough for some of these 'solicitors for rent'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't mind betting this is another one which gets 'stayed' at AQ stage as they won't cough up the fee.

 

I'd also stick in a complaint pronto to Trading Standards and the OFT about them putting in a claim and then passing to a so called legal team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help :)

 

What would it mean if it got 'stayed'?

 

Also, further to my post earlier- "My issue is that I contacted them and there DCA Carter Forbes in July explaining I was struggling and would they accept token payments until I start work for HM Armed Forces in November, neither of them replied. Now they won't negotiate, I really could do without judgement being entered and feel I have tried to negotiate yet they haven't- is there anyway the judge would accept this and not enter judgement?" do I stand any chance of this?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly why you must get the defence in and fill in the information, the reasons go in the correspondence trail and can be argued in court (it will probably be mediation). If you do not enter the defence they will wil automatically.

 

If you enter the defence it then goes onto allocation stage, you fill in another form and send it to the court, they need to cough up an £80 fee for their AQ and this is usually when it gets 'stayed'. When it is 'stayed' you can request a 'strike out' and they cannot enter another plea against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Sillygirl,

 

thanks for your help so far, I have now received the AQ, if I tick the box for mediation? Do you have any other pointers as to what I should/shouldn't say?

 

I have spoken to the court today, they say to send a covering letter explaining that I join the forces in a months time and therefore am unavailable for any hearing so that the case isn't listed, they seem quite helpful.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

thought I'd update whilst I can, I opted for mediation, the claimant has returned there AQ and the court is dealing with the paperwork at the moment, I am trying to chase things up as/when I can. Really want the whole thing sorting now!

 

Will keep you's posted as/when I can :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...