Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LTSB can't stop Payday loans companies raiding account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4726 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am trying to help my daughter sort her finances out.

My daughter is at Uni has fallen foul of 3 pay day loans when things were hard. She has a bank overdraft and the loans keep bouncing so she has charges from the bank of about £100 per month, which obviously makes things a lot worse.

She can't afford the amount demanded by the loan companies and wants to set up a repayment plan that she can afford.

 

I have told her that she needs to take control of her payments to the loan company but the bank today has said that because the companies have her debit card details, payments can't be stopped. The card can't be cancelled and so we have to write to the companies and request that they stop trying to take payment.

 

Any advice please?

 

Thanks,

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer is to tell the card issuer that the card has been compromised

and unauthorised deductions are being made they should then issue

a new card with of course a different signature panel code and card number.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to tell the bank to

 

PUT A STOP ON THE CARD

 

i had this when i fell for the pay day trap

 

in the end barclays gave me a new account number

 

you would be wise to do the same stating continued unauthorized access to your account and ongoing fees

Link to post
Share on other sites

what poor advice from LTSB.

 

they should be helping the customer not benefitting by making charges too.

 

thats whythey wont help !!!

 

as advised

phone the number on the card and advise it has been compromised [internet use etc etc]

 

then TELL THEM in a letter that you NOT TO AUTHORISE any payment to ANY loan companies named XXX XXXX

unless they comtact you first.

 

they seem to forget...its YOUR MONEY NOT THEIRS.

 

pers i'd go bank else where and leave them with the OD too

stuff um, terrible customer service

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

or tell the bank your daughter left bank card/statements in a public area.......

you feel the account ahs been compromised, and require for piece of mind, new account numbers to be issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its new account numbers that are needed

 

these companies have found a way of forcing through transactions on the first 12 digits of your card, even if it has been cancelled

 

get a totally new bank account number

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used the ''compromised' tactic for others who have fallen for Gym subscription that have then gone on to

raise the subs without permission and without notice it always woks it's called FRAUD PREVENTION .

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

The bank manager had also said that even if we closed the account and opened a new one with Lloyds, the loan companies could still access the new account and withdraw money? Weird.

He offered the only way was to write to the companies cancelling my daughter's authorisation to them and if they took money, the bank would get it back.

 

Talk about fraud prevention, Lloyds will let it happen, but it will be OK apparently, they will sort it! Not much prevention involved is there?

 

Unfortunately, we "lost" the card on the way back from the bank and informed Lloyds immediately.

Tomorrow is pay day so we will soon see if they have taken more money out.

I can't pay the loans off for her, got my own problems, and she is not meeting her rent/priority debts, so they will have to accept an arrangement. Unfortunately 2 loans were in May and 1 last Christmas. They really are a rip off. As daughter often says to me, what have you learned?

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard such utter Bowlocks from a Bank Manager, I believe that they are trying to cover

up inadequate care in their own systems this needs a formal complaint to the banks HO

asap,and to OFT.

If the bank allows withdrawals after they have been informed that the card is compromised, they

are seriously in breach of the banking code.

GET COMPLAINING NOW

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

I am recording all this and will put a complaint together.

Lloyds have also been banging £80 charges for unauthorised ODs which has caused the OD to go over again, and incur more charges, and so on. It is a student bank account with a free £1000 OD (their idea) and it has been going over by their charges, for which they have charged another £110 each month. I will be writing to them. OK my daughter has suffered the rabbit caught in the headlights syndrome that many of us get for a while, but the bank has not been helpful or supportive and in fact has just made things worse.

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rocky any bank manager who has stated rubbish like that need the order of the boot where the sun

don't shine,it's almost if not defo criminal that he is saying that they will allow this to happen after

they have been informed and instructed not to allow the withdrawall.

I think FOS & OFT and the banking ombudsman would have a field day with this.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your daughter should be looking at opening a Co-Op account, she certainly shouldn't be with LTSB after this treatment. leave them with the OD and treat it the same as any other non-priority debt. She MUST pay her rent, other priority bills and eat first, if there is enough left the bank will get their share, the same as the other parasites...... I mean creditors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allowing payments to go through using the card is one thing but stating that even if the account is closed and replaced with a new one payments could still be made.......surely not????? This has got to be the largest pile of brown smelly stuff I have ever heard!

 

Definitely get a new bank account for her elsewhere and large complaints to everyone, including your MP.....this is outrageous!

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday, and all is well!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS Said the advice from the bank is rubbish!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

quote

 

Allowing payments to go through using the card is one thing but stating that even if the account is closed and replaced with a new one payments could still be made.......surely not????? This has got to be the largest pile of brown smelly stuff I have ever heard!

 

if you have the same account number then they can still take money off a different card number if linked still to your current account

 

take it from me

 

my wages went in on a Friday, by six am my account was empty

 

the only way to stop this is by a brand new current account number and close down the old one

Link to post
Share on other sites

I experienced a similar thing all be it with a major motor insurance company

having used my card to pay the initial premium over the phone for 1 year

thought no more about it did a comparison this year got a cheaper qoute

paid that after phoning to cancel the old policy only to find that the company

had taken a full years premium for the old policy using my card they to 28

days to refund and attempted to take it 4 more times while I waited

for the refund.

Bl**dy banks you can't trust any of them.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...