Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Forgot to add, got friends in Italy, and one of them rang the Police where the fine came from, and her reply was “Tell your friend it’s not a big deal, it’s only a speeding fine we’re not going to chase him, tell him in future to take his foot off the gas, however it he returns to a Italy and gets control checked, he would be held until the fine is paid”  A bit odd I thought, considering I am being chased now.
    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs beared to you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) basically saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lost tribunal today :(


subwoofer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4718 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I lost my DLA tribunal today

 

I have chronic arthritis in my hips and awaiting a hip replacement

 

i told them i could not take a single step without sever pain and had a report from my gp which stated i could not walk any distance at all without pain but they said this report was dated 16 days after the decision was made on my claim and that it would not be accepted because it was not related to the time of the claim! instead they choose to use evidence from a 2 year old esa medical which stated i could walk over 100 meter's!!

 

so a 2 year old medical is more relevant than a 2 week late one?

 

im totally gutted i cant think straight at the moment i dont know what to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sub

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Its cleary not right, it seems like they wanted your claim to fail. It's disappointing, but I'm sure it can be fought.

Don't let them get you down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They basicaly said all of my evidence was after the original decision was made and therefore it was not to be accepted they said if were to re apply today i could use my current evidence but could not use it for this current claim. i did not sent any of my own evidence at 1st as i thought the dwp would ask my gp for it themselves as they ask in the claim form to give your gp's details but they didn't do this.

 

i arrived in a wheel chair and showed them my letter stating i was waiting for a hip replacement which is due to the same condition i applied for in the original claim but again they said it was dated after the original claim and not relevant

 

i can maby understand the letter which says im awaiting a hip replacement as it was dated 5 months after but the letter from my gp which states im in pain at all times when walking was only 16 days after the original decision surely that is more relevant than a esa report that was 12 months old at the time!

 

They also said that i should not need as much time to get in and out of the bed and bath as i stated in my claim form which was 30 minutes, i explained that this was because it is so painfull it takes several attemps to get in and our of bed i have to stop due to the pain then try again later and they said that if i had to stop due to pain and try again that the time i stopped shold not be counted as you are not reviving help in the time and that the time counted should start when you attempt the task again. i argued that i still needed somebody to wait with me before i attempted it again but they just moved onto the next questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear you lost.

 

The first step is to write to the tribunal service and ask for a statement of reasons - this can take several months. I don't know how they will logically justify using the older report, so this should give you grounds to request an appeal to the upper tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my ESA tribunal and the panel will not consider ANY evidence whatsoever if it is dated after the date of the initial claim. I suspect the law doesn't allow them too. I requsted a statement of reasons a day after my tribunal and then simply made a fresh claim for ESA the following day for the same conditions. Then the process begins all over again.

 

You must make a fresh claim (assuming the 6 month rule as been satisfied). I could have gone to the upper tribunal but then you don't get the ESA assessment rate while this is taking place so that wasn't an option and can only be instigated on a point of law..it's a long shot in my opinion

 

gl

 

SD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal is based on how you were at the time of the claim - any evidence dated after that is useless.

 

SD - there's no 6 month rule for DLA. You can make a new claim whilst appealing too. (I think I've misunderstood you!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal is based on how you were at the time of the claim - any evidence dated after that is useless.

 

SD - there's no 6 month rule for DLA. You can make a new claim whilst appealing too. (I think I've misunderstood you!)

 

Is this correct, there is no waiting period.

So if someone gets turned down for DLA they can immediatley apply again.

I was not aware of this.

Wouldnt this make the whole process go round and round for ever?

What would the point be of appealing then?

So if I was awarded mobility and not care, could I safely apply for the care element with out an appeal which could put my whole claim in danger of being changed for the worse.

Hope this makes sense, just taken a sleeping tablet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can apply again. Your new claim must be based on what you're like now.

 

The point of appealing - if you don't appeal and just put in a new claim, your money will only be backdated to the date your new claim started. Appeal and the money is backdated to the date of that claim.

 

If you already receive DLA and put in a new claim, your current award would be in danger. However, that's not to say you'll lose your current DLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ,something to think about.

My husband was turned down after two years on high mob and care to zero but all the same illnesses plus deafness.

He tells doctor of his joint pains and gets prescribred painkillers and anti inflammatorie for 3 years.

He has hearing aids and needs help to cope.now has a letter from his gp backing him up, hes a cortezone, athroscopy, mri, physio, blood tests and xrays

He is waiting for a paper appeal as it will be quicker, he had a date of Nov for the oral tribunal.

He has pain, depression,iliteracy, anxiety, innsomsia .

He doesnt feel ready to face a tribunal face to face si I will let you know what happens, whenit happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my ESA tribunal and the panel will not consider ANY evidence whatsoever if it is dated after the date of the initial claim. I suspect the law doesn't allow them too. I requsted a statement of reasons a day after my tribunal and then simply made a fresh claim for ESA the following day for the same conditions. Then the process begins all over again.

 

You must make a fresh claim (assuming the 6 month rule as been satisfied). I could have gone to the upper tribunal but then you don't get the ESA assessment rate while this is taking place so that wasn't an option and can only be instigated on a point of law..it's a long shot in my opinion

 

gl

 

SD

 

Not so. I've repped and won plenty of appeals where the evidence is post decision - the only thing that needs to be pointed out is that the evidence represented how you were at the time of the decision. What I'm guessing happened is they did the old 'how you were then, how you are now' confusion which leads in my experience to inevitable failure of the appeal. Admitting to deterioration without being incredibly clear in a written statement (submission) about when the deterioration occured only leads to confusion and failure.

 

Even so, with evidence 16 days after the decision, it will be very difficult to deny that this is representative of condition at the time of decision. As long as all evidence was presented well, and there were no contradictory statements on the record of proceedings, this is one that I would have been confident of arguing to an upper tribunal.

 

Forgot to say - also ask for a record of proceedings - it should be, but isn't always, included with the statement of reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ,something to think about.

My husband was turned down after two years on high mob and care to zero but all the same illnesses plus deafness.

He tells doctor of his joint pains and gets prescribred painkillers and anti inflammatorie for 3 years.

He has hearing aids and needs help to cope.now has a letter from his gp backing him up, hes a cortezone, athroscopy, mri, physio, blood tests and xrays

He is waiting for a paper appeal as it will be quicker, he had a date of Nov for the oral tribunal.

He has pain, depression,iliteracy, anxiety, innsomsia .

He doesnt feel ready to face a tribunal face to face si I will let you know what happens, whenit happens.

 

Unfortunately paper DLA appeals are much more likely to fail as the tribunal members won't be able to ask questions - but if he's not up to it there is little else to be done. Just make sure that you write a submission (statement) putting your case forward and arguing against the DWP's reasons for refusing benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leemack,

Is it correct that he can reapply for DLA before his tribunal date with the same medical condition before 6 months of being turned down?

Thank you.

 

The medical condition doesn't matter, it's the needs that arise from it. So if needs have changed then you can apply ASAP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leemack,

Is it correct that he can reapply for DLA before his tribunal date with the same medical condition before 6 months of being turned down?

Thank you.

 

Yes he can reapply again, its not like ESA and doesn't have the same 6 month rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...