Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO & Turnbull Rutherford have issued me with a summons and I'm freaked


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4625 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HFO wrote to me out of the blue in Dec 2010. They sent me an aerial photo of my home, equifax report and lots of other stuff. Using your templates I wrote to them with and require £1 postal order. They ignored it. They wrote twice more ignoring my letters asking them to provide me with proof.

 

I wrote to the solicitors also but they have also ignored me. I now have a summons and don't know what to do.

 

I have copies of the letters but I stupidly didn't keep proof of posting or of the postal order. What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing that springs immediately to mind off the top of my head is to send them and the solicitors an SAR. You will then get everything they hold about you which should include the letters you sent.

 

As you know they have ignored a legal requirement. Don't say this when you send an SAR - if you want a template I can post one up. If you do go this route get at least Proof of Postage (receipt is assumed by a court, but some like the reassurance of a signature by going the slightly more expensive way of sending Recorded Delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome

 

Have you actually received a court claim? are you able to scan up or type in what you what you have received, with personal details removed?

 

I am going to ask the site team to move this thread to the legal forum then it is in the right place

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a court claim form? You need to respond to the claim form via the courts to say you are going to defend the claim in full! A subject access only goes to the original creditor. You can CCA request HFO. Please type HFO into the search box on this forum and read some of the threads about this company. These clowns are issuing as many claims as possible in the hope nobody defends,because as you will read they are under scrutiny from the Office Of Fair Trading regarding their credit license. Please read!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, I suggest you write to TR advising them that they should not be taking such enforcement action while in default of a CCA request. Invite them to discontinue. Do not acknowledge any debt.

 

This is tactical. You'll defend this anyway. But telling them they have made an error and giving them some rope will truly hang them, especially with the OFT, if they continue the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised they are still allowed to create new cases for the courts when they may not have locus standii in the first place.

Courts are not interested they are their to rake in money and as in my case not listen to the arguements put to them but to rubber stamp solicitors representing the claimant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies. I'm not great with IT so I've typed it out.

 

HFO sent me copies of statement extracts the earliest being 6/1/05 the latest 5/7/05 relating to the amount they say I owe.

 

"The claim is for monies due from the Defendant under an interest - bearing credit agreement. The defendant defaulted on this agreement. The Claimant HFO Services Ltd is a services and collections company which collects debts for HFO Capital Ltd. HFO Capital purchased the defendants account and all rights and obligations attaching thereto from the original lender on(no date submitted here) Notice of assignment has been provided to the Defendant. The Claimant claims £225 being instalment arrears due from the Defendant. On satisfaction of this claim and the costs there will be an unpaid balance of (no amount) to be paid by the Defendant which is acruing interest at the contractural rate of 12% pa.

 

I panicked with the court summons and sent this back to the court.

 

 

Please see extracts of two letters sent to HFO Services which they

have failed to respond to. I enclosed the £1 postal on 9/12/10 as

required. These letters were also sent to Turnbull Rutherford

Solicitors 11 February 2011 but again I have not had any reply I

have no record or details of the debt they say I owe. All I have

ever received are 3 standard letters from HFO and 2 from the

solicitors. I feel bullied and intimidated by their threats,

photographs of the house I live and now this summons.

 

9/12/10

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Re:− Account/Reference Number

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77(1) of the

Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true

copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account,

together with any other documentation the Act requires you to

provide.

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request,

within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you

fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will

apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA

1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty

upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an

absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If

you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of

any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear

that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer

Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the

statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any

other purpose.

 

2nd letter dated 30/1/11

 

 

31/1/11

Dear Sir/Madam

Re:− Account/Reference Number

Second request First request made 9/12/11

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77(1) of the

Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true

copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account,

together with any other documentation the Act requires you to

provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually acknowledged the claim and said you are going to defend it?

 

What is the date on the Claim Form?

 

It is a 'Split claim' they are claiming instalment arrears only and easy to defend. Under the 'County court Act', if they won this they would not be able to bring a further claim for the balance as it would be multiple claims for the same cause of action but they usually 'stay' the proceedings if you defend.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I replied to the summons. It was issued 1/6/11 and I replied yesterday I think. Below is what I said.

 

" Please see extracts of two letters sent to HFO Services which they

have failed to respond to. I enclosed the £1 postal on 9/12/10 as

required. These letters were also sent to Turnbull Rutherford

Solicitors 11 February 2011 but again I have not had any reply I

have no record or details of the debt they say I owe. All I have

ever received are 3 standard letters from HFO and 2 from the

solicitors. I feel bullied and intimidated by their threats,

photographs of the house I live and now this summons. "

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did and did via Money claims online. What's puzzling me and concerning me is that the actual summons has gaps in amounts and dates. They can't add stuff in can they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - they have just issued a very vague POC which it is defend in itself. I could have given you a far more detailed defence and you could have requested more info from them before submitting it but actually, what you have done is fine. You have basically told them your objections and let them get on with it. If they want to take this further they must reply to your defence within 28 days and provide further information which you can respond to but I have never known them do this for a 'split claim'. If they don't respond, the claim is stayed and sits on file.

 

They issue these in the hope of getting a 'default judgement', I think. This would mean they could put more pressure on people who do not understand the process.

 

I still think that you need to write a letter to TR along the lines suggested by DB and add that you have defended this.

 

I presume the Original creditor is not named on the POC. Who is the OC out of interest?

 

You must write a letter of complaint to OFT with copies of all the correspondence including the personal data. Send to

 

James Waldron, and the address is OFT, Fleet Bank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4 8JX.

 

HFO are currently having there license reviewed so any complaint is a nail in the old coffin.

  • Confused 1

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Figures that it is Barclaycard - did you have an account with Barclaycard? If so, how long ago?

 

Letter to TR, try this format and update as necessary

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

I acknowledge no debt to your Client.

 

I am in receipt of you claim reference xxxx and have submitted a defence to this claim.

 

I am assuming that this 'partial claim' is in respect of Account ref xxxx having received correspondence about this from HFO Services, although the Particulars of Claim do not actually reference or identify the actual debt.

 

Please note that I wrote to your Client on (details of letters sent) and submitted a request under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act. Your Client has not responded to this correspondence. Copies are enclosed for your information.

 

Please be advised that I do not consider it appropriate that you undertake such enforcement action while in default of a CCA request. I would request that you discontinue this action forthwith

 

Your Faithfully

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...