Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Why would you do a Freedom Of Information Request? Thats for public and government bodies only...    Either way, this is what happens in debt collection. Accounts sold as a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a system that contact people to pay until they give in .  They never send the original agreements with pruchase. And yes, please do name names..
    • I bought a rare collectible item from a friend in USA. I paid him via Paypal and had him send it to my forwarding address in USA. This is a business called Stackry which is essentially storage lockers that consolidate packages for you and you choose how and where to ship them, thus cutting on international shipping costs. I have done this many times before and never had an issue. On this occasion, I chose the option of Global Mail Direct. The package was picked up and handed to DHL e-commerce and I was able to track it all the way to the UK. From then on, it was handed over to Evri and a new tracking number was generated. Long story short, they lost it. The driver marked it "out for delivery" then 2 hours later "returning to sender". I was at home and no attempt for delivery was made. What followed was several weeks of back and forth with Evri through chatbots, emails and phone calls trying to locate the package and have it delivered to me. They said I should contact the sender. I explained that in this scenario I am the sender and the recipient. I did not get anywhere. I emailed the CEO and joined a Facebook group. I kept screenshots of everything. At no point did they make a genuine attempt to intercept the package or locate it or at least assure me that it's on its way back to its origin in the US. For several weeks now, the tracking is simply stuck at "on its way back to sender". They owe me £200 and I intend to get it. I do not care how long it takes or how much it costs me. I am prepared to fight this to the end. I wrote them a letter before action and sent it by tracked post to their HQ giving them 14 days to make things right before I take the matter to court. It has been a week now and I have had no response.  I have no experience with legal matters and I am hoping someone can guide me into what I should do next. Thank you.
    • Thanks Dx, Tbh, I’d forgotten that this account was the subject of a charges claim - nearly 10 years ago now! I don’t know for sure that a default notice was issued by Barclays when the account was in arrears but I would guess there may have been one somewhere in 2010. A suspended repossession order was awarded around May 2010 so I’d assume that a default notice would have been a pre-requisite. Based on the info in the thread those arrears were cleared around 2014-2015 but I don’t have any more info to hand atm since it’s such a long time ago. I believe the files I prepped for court in 2015 have since been shredded. How would the presence or absence of an old default notice help with this current issue? Thanks for the merge/support. J  
    • This is the full SAR documents that I received. It includes the proof that they deliberately chose not to give me a physical PCN at the time of parking. W3 SAR documents .pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Co-Operative


Zorbadog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4722 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

First post and looking for advice on our local Co-Op.

 

We moved to our town about four years ago and in that time I would estimate we have been wrongly charged for Special Offer items somewhere between 60 - 100 times. It is something that other people have commented on also.

 

Given that most people probably never look at their bill, particularly pensioners, or cant be bothered to go back to the shop for a couple of pounds, this shop must be making tens of thousands of pounds overcharging people.

 

We have contacted the Co-Op head office on a couple of occasions, what more could we do? and is it something trading standards would be interested in?

 

thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say "Special Offer" items are you referrring to items near their sell by/best before date that have been marked down in price? This sometimes happens to me in my local Co-Op, seemingly more by the ignorance/don't care attitude of the staff who fail to notice the reduction sticker and just scan the original bar code. Where I have picked up items such as these I watch the till display closely and challenge them if I am not getting the reduction I am expecting. I would suggest you do the same.

 

I don't know whether Trading Standards would be interested, perhaps you could try contacting them and seeing what they have to say. It seems to me quite likely that they would act if they were convinced the problem was endemic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IainHL

 

No I am talking about two for a certain amount type thing. My wife was in the shop earlier, and bought a packet of Quavers crisps, meant to be half price at £1.84. When she went to pay at the till, they came up at £3.69, and when she queried it the assistant reduced them to the correct price. Since she has got home we have noticed she bought two packs of chicken breasts, meant to be two for £5, and she has been charged £3 each for them. It really is getting totally out of hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... and is it something trading standards would be interested in?

 

:wink:

 

Trading Standards do not so much as own the choice, to take no notice.

 

Section 19 of The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations insists that "It shall be the duty of every enforcement authority to enforce these Regulations" and there could hardly be a doubt that the misleading commercial practice in question "causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise", which is therefore a strict liability criminal offence.

 

It is not an acceptable excuse, to be careless. The Regulations require that the trader took, "all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of such an offence by himself or any person under his control."

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes its a trading standards issues. i work in a major supermarket and its impossible to have everything priced right 100% all the time. but in a small co op i wouldnt of thought they should have many pricing issues as you say they do. I would inform trading standards and air your concern. it might take a few more people raising their concern with pricing in the store because i once spoke to a memeber of trading standards and he said that because of wage cuts etc they will look at higher priority cases.

also make sure you check your reciepts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me the other day, in a local Tescos. The price label immediately below the goods offered a price of £1.65 or "Two for the price of one". Then I noticed a large advertisement above the shelves, clearly displayed: £1 EACH.

 

Wondering what would happen, I took an item to the till and said "Can I just have this for £1?"

 

"One pound sixty five, please" came the reply.

 

After a bit or an argument I got it for the £1, as advertised, with the manager trying to make out that this was some sort of special favour, with the extra paid from his own pocket.

 

Really?

 

... can't help but wonder to what extent this sort of "error" is deliberate. If in all honesty they are just too stupid to ensure that any advertised offer is already recorded on the database of prices before the public display of a special offer, there are kids at school, yet to take their O-levels who could show them how.

 

It's a matter of simple logistics, not rocket science.

 

:roll:

 

This is nonsense:

 

yes its a trading standards issues. i work in a major supermarket and its impossible to have everything priced right 100% all the time.

 

It is perfectly possible, all of the time, the same as it is perfectly possible to charge for the goods; one price on the shelves, the same at the till. Simple. They know how to do it when they want to.

Edited by perplexity
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough Zorba, that comes down to the till software not being in step with what's on the floor (well shelves, but you know what I mean!). I guess that would tend to make it a store management issue rather than a general staff incompetence one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

from working in two large leading supermarlets the pricing and offers will be updated on the tills/computers and then any changes must be done by staff. they will have some sort of list showing what will change and when.

so basically take the example of the chickens on the 2 for £x.xx offer. it will run from a certain date and then the store will be told it finishes on a certain date so they need to take the labels off saying the offer has finished at the right time.

so these issues will be 99% human error in store where the store hasnt follow there process for offers and price changes

Link to post
Share on other sites

so basically take the example of the chickens on the 2 for £x.xx offer. it will run from a certain date and then the store will be told it finishes on a certain date so they need to take the labels off saying the offer has finished at the right time.

so these issues will be 99% human error in store where the store hasnt follow there process for offers and price changes

 

... which is therefore short of "due diligence".

 

Were it a loss to the store, not the consumer, I fancy that they would and could be sure that the price at the till increases after the change to the price displayed, not before.

 

If it happened the other way around, that a price displayed is more than the price at the till I might be convinced that the error is inadvertent but in all honesty, I have yet to notice that it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With our local co op which to be fair I have to say since amalgamating with the other firm their prices have dropped greatly:-D

 

The problems I come across are at start of an offer and end of offer with the product not tallying with till due to either they have put the goods our too early re that offer or not took them off time enough at end of offer. If you are lucky to notice they of course refund you promptly but I must say my daughter who does the shops there is not as observant as me and resents the trips back and forth to correct it.

 

One well known irk is the meal deal, where you get brilliant deal of sarnie, drink and cake or crips for only £3.00. The offer on the various sarnies seems to occassionally change, yet you pick up a meal deal one and get charged as found out only yesterday seven quid roughly in total extra on the ones we bought.

 

Daughter got her refund but have to say I bet there is a huge ammount of cases where people do not realise and over pay, but have to say I suppose that is up to us to be more careful as I nag my daughter and for the likes of trading standards to do routine checks if enough issues occurr within similar time frame.

 

Cant beat their 3 quid meal deal though:lol: YUM

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think every major supermarket will have loads of pricing issues. it comes down to the fact these businesses are becoming a tougher environment to work in as a result of trying to stay cheap and affordable at a low cost

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...