Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Support for Mortgage interest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help with an housing benefit claim?

 

In 2000, an house was purchase and in 2006 there was a re-mortgage.

In 2009 unfortunately there was a claim for housing benefit due to unemployment.

I must add that there has been extensive work carried out at the said property that has increase the property value significantly.

Also the claimant is 38 yrs old and it is the first time ever to have made any benefits claims.

 

After numerous attempts since last October for an explanation as to why there is such a short full of payment towards the interest only via telephone and by letter, they (benefit office) have just sent a reply of an explanation. Their explanation is vague so runs short of a full understanding as to why this is.

The benefits office is using the original mortgage as the bases of their calculations.

 

The original mortgage was £145,000

The re-mortgage is now (from 2006) £258,000

 

Any advice regarding this will be hugely appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also it only covers the initial mortgage, unless the remortgage was for essential works - and you would need to prove the money paid for the essential works - with receipts etc. They don't care if the property value was increased, only if the work was essential - so if you needed a new roof, or a boiler, or a wall rebuilt or insulation, then that might be considered essential, but things like extensions, loft conversions, internal non essential renovations or decorating would not be covered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the house was purchased the claimant and partner had only 2 children. Since then there has been an additional 3 more children which was the plan, hence why the renovations was done. Also the 2 older children have now come of age and require their own rooms.

The work undertaken included complete new electrics, heating system, new kitchen and roofing as well has additional rooms. All work that took place was done at a high standard and is well insulated which is environmentally friendly to which society has encourage us all to do.

None of us all can foresee what the future brings as far as the economy gos, so it came as a complete shock when they (the claimant) found their-self unemployed for the first time in their life.

It has also been mentioned just recently that they could have a claim regarding PPI but again they are not getting any co-operation from the mortgage broker. They are quite certain that they were charged for this.

As you can imagine all this has taken it's toll on their health.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing that can be done is appeal the mortgage interest decision, send in a long letter giving explanations of why the works were essential and providing receipts for all the work. The trick is convincing them that it was essential work, which is really difficult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. Can u explain why it will be difficult when it's so obvious?

 

What a sensible person considers essential and what the DWP consider essential can be two different things. Get a benefit caseworker if possible and get them to argue the points for you. Some of the work may be acceptable, but I've seen new kitchens and extra bedrooms rejected before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I can't get my head around is for example: If someone purchased their property say 20 yrs ago and in this time, rather move on and upgrade they decide to do extensive work, maybe several times throughout this period and as history tell us property go's up in the long run, then all of a sudden because of bad economic & politics they found themselves unemployed, they could loose their home because by this time the original mortgage may only be a fraction of what the re-mortgage is now. Also what makes this worse is that people could loose their homes with say just 5yrs left to go on mortgage contract because of a massive short full in payments, heart breaking especially after paying good tax's all their working life!

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.....When politician's put in a claim they just go to the gravy train and dip in.

May have to plant a few more seeds as I did in 2007. Never did close the book over this affair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I had to do essential work on my old house, I borrowed about £20,000.

I moved into my present house while still working.

When I lost my job the DWP told me that although they agreed the work on my old house was essential to my family, as the house improvements were for another house then they would not help me with the payments.

It is a crazy system.

I am now struggling but stuck here as I cannot get a mortgage even on a cheaper house while unemployed.

The mortgage company told me to go to the citizens advice if I was having trouble and they would help me with a budget.

That is not much help, unless the citizens advice can help me print money then there is nothing that can be done.

You will soon realise like I have that there is no real help out there for house holders no matter what people tell you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi leemack. Just looking at the reply sent from you at 12:21am on18/05/11. You say here "They don't care if the property value was increased, only if the work was essential". What was meant by value was that given time all property will increase in value. If given choice some will move to upgrade and some will stay and expand on plot if this is an option.

If there is more children added to the family unit then surely this should be classed as essential as it is for MP's to claim 2nd home's to be nearer Parliament!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next part I understand that there was PPI tide to this mortgage as I have already stated. There has been attempts made to the named mortgage company to see if there are/was PPI to this contract but it seems to have fallen on death ears. Can anyone give any guidance as to what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...