Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AXA life insurance denied due to non-diagnosed epileptic seizure 7 years previously


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!

 

I must say, it's been a LOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time since I have been on the furums! Finished university (get results on 26th!), started working as a support worker and planning my wedding! :-) But there was an element of rubbishness and I wish I was here under better circumstances.

 

Last July, my mother's partner started to show signs of a stroke. After a dash to the hospital, he was told it wasn't, but obviously something was going on. After a few weeks of tests, he was diagnosed with a brain tumor. By this point, the tumor was apparently a 'Stage 3' - apparently the stage scale goes from 1 (Teeny) to 4 (Goodnight Vienna). He had a round of radiotherapy and chemo, both of which were unsuccessful and caused him to deteriorate further and was stopped midway. By september, he was unable to support himself and had no real means of communication. At the beginning of October, he had a morning of seizures (as is common with such brain diseases) and passed away.

 

Now, he never signed a will: he got round to almost completing one but it wasn't finished and it wasn't signed/witnessed. He and my mum were also not married, although they had the usual joint financial stuff together, which resulted in his mum, whom he had no relationship with and didn't even bother to show at his funeral, is probate... Her other son is trying to take over the estate management so it'll be easier for my mum to sort out, as she has dealt with the funeral and stuff... They have a life insurance policy with AXA (still waiting on full info and a copy of the policy) which was submitted in November 2010. They have been humming and hawing for months, about the claim, then sent a letter asking for access to his GP records. AXA got the approval and in March 2011, they denied the payout and claim 'based on a technicality'. The technicality is apparently because he had taken epilepsy meds 7 years previous to taking out the policy. He had a few random seizures years ago, and took some meds for a few years, but came off them as they made him feel awful or something... He didn't have epilepsy, he was told by doctor that it was 'idiopathic epilepsy' i.e., the catchall condition for when you show symptoms of something, but there are no signs...

 

Anyways, the claim was denied because of this, even though the neurology consultant has stated that this epilepsy drug years ago is irrelevant to his death. We are unsure if he even mentioned the non-epilepsy at the time of applying or the meds, as he did it by phone... This claim has resulted my my mother being screwed by her bank with the mortgage, and she is now being taken to court by the funeral directors due to non-payment, despite offering repeated payment plans. Ive asked her to get a dosclosure on his med records, something from Neurology to state that the meds/epilepsy issue is irrelevant, and, most importantly, a great big dirty disclosure on AXA...

 

Sorry it's sooooo long, but thought best to give as much info as I could in order to receive some much needed help. My mum has an appointment with a CAB officer next week so I'll see what happens...

 

Cheers

 

Sazz

Lloyds Current A/C DPA sent 7th May 2009 Closed and charges wiped Summer 2010.

 

Barclays A/C DPA sent 4th June 2009: no reply, no correspondence as of 2011.

 

Littlewoods Data Protection Act Section 10 sent 09/06/2006 - Fraudulent A/C closed and CRA data removed November 2006.

 

HSBC Default & Debt wiped March 2009 (6 yr Statute barred reached)

 

RBS - Claim 1 - Settled in FULL £766.00 20/06/2006.

RBS - Claim 2 - Settled in FULL £777.95 08/09/2006

 

 

BOS A/C No. 1 & 2

Amount - £586.39 claim plus 8% interest

SETTLED IN FULL 08/09/2006 - CHEQUE FOR £625.25

 

Halifax Visa Data Protection Act Disclosure Received

 

First Direct Data Protection Act Disclosure received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have alerted the site team for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I've only just seen this, having been off the forums. Has anything else happened since you last posted?

 

I think it could be helpful if you would post up the wording in the policy that Axa are relying on, if they've told you. Was the epilepsy problem declared on the proposal form for the policy?

 

Please post what you can. You might also consider contacting the FSA on Monday. Someone on their helpline should be able to advise you.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sazz.

 

I've a feeling that your Mum is probably going to need specialist help with this. The only thing that I can think of is to ask the doctor to write to the insurance company to say that this is unrelated to any previous episode, as you said. However if your Mum's partner failed to disclose that there had been a problem then I have an awful feeling this will be an uphill struggle.

 

The only other thing is that she could just follow the insurance companies complaints procedure, and if she can't get a satisfactory result she could take it to the insurance ombudsman.

 

Regarding the funeral, if the family are dealing with probate perhaps they should help out or cover the cost of the funeral.

 

Regarding the lack of a will, if the insurance policy was intended for your mother, then that must be a strong argument that the intention was that everything should go to her. If the partner's share of the house goes to someone else then they need to take over payment of his share - or will his mother want to cash in on this?

 

What an awful situation for your Mum. She must be at her wits end.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to see if the policy is one of 2 ms sold back in 2004. They were fined £500,000 by the FSA, it maybe of help to read through these links:

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/library/communication/pr/2004/111.shtml

 

Full Final Notice version here:

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/axa_21dec04.pdf

 

Hope this helps. . .

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

Many thanks for all your suggestions so far... I have just finished work and will be calling the Mumsie tomorrow, so I'll update with relevant info :) Still awaiting a copy of the policy documents too...

 

Sarah

Lloyds Current A/C DPA sent 7th May 2009 Closed and charges wiped Summer 2010.

 

Barclays A/C DPA sent 4th June 2009: no reply, no correspondence as of 2011.

 

Littlewoods Data Protection Act Section 10 sent 09/06/2006 - Fraudulent A/C closed and CRA data removed November 2006.

 

HSBC Default & Debt wiped March 2009 (6 yr Statute barred reached)

 

RBS - Claim 1 - Settled in FULL £766.00 20/06/2006.

RBS - Claim 2 - Settled in FULL £777.95 08/09/2006

 

 

BOS A/C No. 1 & 2

Amount - £586.39 claim plus 8% interest

SETTLED IN FULL 08/09/2006 - CHEQUE FOR £625.25

 

Halifax Visa Data Protection Act Disclosure Received

 

First Direct Data Protection Act Disclosure received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck,

 

These insurance companies look for technicalities....

I remember one guy got refused a payout for critical illness cover, because he didnt note on the application form that he had a big toe nail removed, due it ingrowing

 

Absolutely absurd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...