Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Support for mortgage interest query.


Deimos
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have a question for someone, if you'd be so kind.

 

Regarding support for mortgage interest, how much of the interest on a mortgage does the scheme cover?

 

For instance, let's say there's three people on an interest only/capital mortgage, the mortgage is 137k, all the people are now on benefit due to sudden illness/sickness

 

Let's assume for the moment the mortgage costs £650 a month, half of which is interest only, so £325.

 

Would the government cover the entire £325?

 

Also, if the mortgage was interest only, would they cover the entire amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, so if our mortgage was interest only, at 3.X percent and cost us say, £300 a month, would they cover the full amount?

 

(I/We are NOT trying to rip the government off, we're just in a state where we need help, or we'll lose our home)

 

Assuming we kept our current interest/repayment mortgage, I assume the mortgage company would still insist we pay the repayment right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's three names, yes

We want to get one of the names removed at some point, as he hasn't been paying his share of the mortgage

So I'm thinking we should switch to an interest only mortgage for £137,000 for the time being, until both of us are well enough to work again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are three names on the mortgage then the dwp will only pay a third, I believe - so each person needs to claim mortgage interest for their third - except if two of the people are married or partners, then their one income based claim would cover two thirds and the other person would need to vlaim their third.

 

Not sure I've explained that very well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea that's what we found out just recently

I was the only claimant, my dad didn't realise he could claim, as he currently gets pension credit, so he claimed a week ago (Hasn't had confirmation or whatnot yet, but he did get the application to take to the mortgage company)

Uncle (the idiot who we want removed) also claimed, as he's currently claiming disability/sickness, despite working for cash in hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And before I confront my father tomorrow, can I just confirm, once again, IF the government covers the interest part of our mortgage, the mortgage company will still expect us to pay the repayment part, correct?

 

For some reason my dad is of the belief that if we have the interest part covered, the mortgage company won't care about the repayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, your mortgage repayment is arranged between you and the mortgage company - if there's any shortfall after the mortgage interest has been paid by the DWP, then you have to make up the difference.

 

Some mortgage companies may be prepared to allow reduced payments for a period of time, or allow you to rearrange what you pay. But you would need to contact them to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did say that if the rate was below 3.65 it would cover the Interest Only portion of the mortgage. If Adams rate is higher than 3.65 he will have to cover the excess even on an interest only mortgage. Thats why I asked what the current rate was.

 

The FSA have said that lenders should allow changes to mortgages for customers in distress although I know that some lenders are very awkward about this. Some have stipulations regarding the equity amount eg if the loan to value of the mortgage is more than 70% they will not allow the change to Interest Only payments.

Edited by daisy lighter
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did say that if the rate was below 3.65 it would cover the Interest Only portion of the mortgage. If Adams rate is higher than 3.65 he will have to cover the excess even on an interest only mortgage. Thats why I asked what the current rate was.

 

The FSA have said that lenders should allow changes to mortgages for customers in distress although I know that some lenders are very awkward about this. Some have stipulations regarding the equity amount eg if the loan to value of the mortgage is more than 70% they will not allow the change to Interest Only payments.

 

Sorry are you responding to my post - we posted close together and my post was in response to Adam's not yours. I was simply stating yes he would have to cover any shortfall between whatever his mortgage payment was and the dwp interest payment - and yes, regardless of the type of mortgage deal. I wasn't contradicting you - we're saying the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my situation, my lender agreed to accept interest only for a period, this was reviewed on a 3 montly basis. I inititially got the higher 6% rate which covered the interest and some of the repayment, then it changed to the 3% rate (its not fixed its based on average or BoE rate plus something%), luckily my mortgage reached the end of its 5.5% fixed period and fell onto the lenders 2.5% rate so I wasnt too badly off.

 

Found a job since then, so problem solved (for a year anyway !).

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer your questions, I'm not sure what interest rate we're on, but it IS the lower amount, our original 6% ended back in October, so I "think" it's 3.5%ish.

 

Well..be sure to contact them straight away and find out and tell them the cirtcumstances, keeping them informed is key to sortting it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...