Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • forewarned is forearmed as they say? if i dont have the facts straight off wouldnt it just start a timewasting excercise of letter tennis?  
    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have mow provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suspended for gross misconduct Pls help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Without goin into to much detail I have been off work ill with a mental illness for past 5 month , all of which was supported by both my GP and the company's designated dr.

 

On my return to work I went through a phased return as advised by the company dr.

 

When I returned to work I clearly expressed my concern about missing so much training both on plant applications and h+s training as I know how fast things move forward on both accounts.

 

My line management agreed to this and before I returned to my normal position my line manager stated on my return to work interview form that I was to be brought up to speed with h+s changes and to refresh my knowledge of h+s .

Through a health + Safety refresher course

During my phased return to work my line manager stated that on the 2nd week I was to be trained in h+s as this is by company policy meant to be done periodically .

 

This was not forthcoming and left me with a distinct disadvantage on my return to my normal duties after 4 days I got suspended for serious breach of h+s causing damage to company property.

 

Basically I was driving a JCB loader shovel and whilst in operation the back axle snapped and subsequently broke the loading shovel.

 

I followed company reporting procedure by informing my line manager, he then took the lead in the incident and arranged for the shovel to be repaired.

 

The company are alleging that I breached H+S by me clearing up debris with the loading shovel which are outside my normal duties therefore I should have filled in a permit to work form. I have done this task on numerous occasions in previous years and have never had to fill out a permit to work so obviously the policy had changed during my time off.

 

I feel that if I had been able to update my existing skills on H+S as requested by myself due to been off ill for such a lengthy period that the mistake would not have happened.

 

There is a lot more about my illness that I could go into I.E I am currently under going physciactric therapy to assist and help me in my recovery, which the company as directed by there own designated dr. are meant to be assisting me in . My illness just doesn't get understood by alot of people and most people think it's just an excuse to have time off. I feel this is what the management team feel but can assure you that it is a living hell.

 

Just not sure how I should approach the inevitable disciplinary hearing ..being off work for so long and due to lack of training and the companys failure to stick to the return to work agreement that both me and my employer signed as what will happen over the weeks of my phased return.

 

Also due to my illness as with all mental illnesses you become extremely forgetful and the side effects of my medication clearly state that loss of memory can occur..

 

Maybe the blame should lie with management for not doing a risk assessment on me and maybe that after 6 months of not doing any work to allow me to run a plant where I am responsible for my own and other peoples health and safety that they have abused there duty of care

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks I have my fact finding interview this afternoon I am going to base my case on the company not being forthcoming in the refresher training I was promised . I know that my managers want me out but surely they must have offered me a re fresher course especially after being off for such a lengthy period. Its no coincidence that on my first day back on normal duties that I get suspended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will deem they have made reasonable adjustments by allowing me to do a phased return to work . As week 1 I was based in office working half contracted hours. Week 2 based at a local plant closer to home still on reduced hours.

Week 3 back at my normal plant but with no responsibilities

 

Then week 4 I began my normal duties albeit for just a few hours before I got suspended.

 

It's like they agreed to my phased return that got advised by there own designated doctor and aftr I had completed this phased return that they assumed I had some how miraculously recovered . Even the last doctors report advised that I should continue to receive management support for a further 3 month period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmn

 

moving away from the sickness part, if your company can show you undertook a role you were not trained or permitted to undertake which resulted in a "serious" H&S breach your in very hot water

 

Why i'm not concerned over the sickness part at the moment is because this could possibly also happen with someone who had not been off sick, the key is you refer to a "permit to work", please explain this more

 

If your going to defend this you will need to show that not only was it common place/normal before your sickness for you to operate machinery in the fashion you did and the employer was aware of this but that anything they built into this while you were off should have been made clear on your return

 

can you expalin more of the "permit to work" and also why you felt it was fine to operate the jcb?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmn

 

 

 

moving away from the sickness part, if your company can show you undertook a role you were not trained or permitted to undertake which resulted in a "serious" H&S breach your in very hot water

 

 

 

Why i'm not concerned over the sickness part at the moment is because this could possibly also happen with someone who had not been off sick, the key is you refer to a "permit to work", please explain this more

 

 

 

If your going to defend this you will need to show that not only was it common place/normal before your sickness for you to operate machinery in the fashion you did and the employer was aware of this but that anything they built into this while you were off should have been made clear on your return

 

 

 

can you expalin more of the "permit to work" and also why you felt it was fine to operate the jcb?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for reply.

 

A permit to work is a legal document that you must sign and complete before doing any duties outside your normal every day duties to protect yourself from injury. Basically you document down any specific dangers that may occur during the task.

 

I have now had my fact finding interview and although I answered the questions as honestly as possible I really struggled with some to remember certain H & S ones.

 

Apparently where I drove tge JCB there was 240v cables exposed under some bushes.

 

They questioned me as to why I did not look at the electrical cable diagram that should be on the notice board.

 

Maybe a saving grace was that this diagram was missing off the notice board so how was I possibly going to be made aware of these cables. And also why was 240v cables just lying in undergrowth and not buried?

 

I know that if I had been given the re fresher course training then potentially this could have been avoided.

 

Having said that even the most experienced guy could have made this mistake because the underground electrical cable diagram was missing from the notice board where it is meant to be displayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah so it's some form of risk assessment, the notice board or lack of is also a good thing for you

 

To be honest i find it hard to advise further at the moment, whether i'm having a blonde moment or not i'm not sure but i can't get my head around how this is being operated, therefore i'll await the outcome of the fact finding hearing

 

keep us updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will get back at some point next week. There just seems to be to many failings in this matter for me to be dismissed.

 

I openly discussed my intentions and we both planned to improve the area in question so was I write in assuming that this was permission to do the job?

 

The failure to have the underground electricalservice plan displayed on the safety notice board that would have shown underground services.

 

The fact that a 240v live cable was allowed to just nestle in the brambles and not be buried underground to meet the safety requirements also shows a major failing to keep employees safe.

 

As I have already submitted the fact that as documented and I have in writing that I should take in H&S training before resuming my normal duties.

 

The failings to go through the updates of the health and safety notices/ rules.

 

I don't know if it's just me being biassed but taking all this into account surely they will not be able to dismiss me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who told you to drive the loader

 

was it a manager

 

Driving the loader is just part of my everyday duties and because of the size of the area there would have been no other option but to use the front end bucket. Yes during the discussion between myself and senior supervisor I informed him that I would be using the shovel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAS THE SUPERVISOR CONFIRMED THIS IN A STATEMENT

 

during the discussion between myself and senior supervisor I informed him that I would be using the shovel.

 

Not to my knowledge he hasn't but if he is not being misled by senior management I do not see a reason why he wouldn't confirm this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to my knowledge he hasn't but if he is not being misled by senior management I do not see a reason why he wouldn't confirm this

 

It's now been 3 weeks and I still have not heard anything, this whole episode has made me very ill again , I have had to increase my medication, have more intense phyciactric help even if no action gets taken I will not be able to attend work.

Could I ask for a compromise agreement or would that be an admission of guilt on my behalf?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well after 6 hrs today spent in disciplinary hearing there is still no decision . I am amazed that the company was stupid enough to falsify Health & Safety training certificates to try and prove I had training before the incident which was used as evidence against me. I called 2 witnesses that have demonstrated that as they was with me on days specified on my certificate of attendance training certificates , that have now proved that these training certificates to be falsified , as this allegation by me was made and the fact I have witnesses collaborating my allegation . I was amazed how the hearing wasn't adjourned whilst these allegations was investigated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you put a grievance in on all this? (I have only scanned previous post so forgive me if this is repeated) On your illness, have you had this for many years or is it a recent thing? The Equality Act 2010 protects people that have disabilities that have lasted 12 months, likely to last 12 months. The disability must affect the activities of daily living eg concentration memory, an ability to work. The fact that the employer has made you see their doctor who recommended a phesed return seems to suggect that they have discrimination issues at the back of their decision making.

 

You seem pessimistic about your chances of remaining in work. It seems to me that in these circumstances you should raise a grievance and allege discrimination, failing to make reasonable adjustments and indeed failing to observe their own policies. By raising a grievance in this manner you increase the anti by alleging discrimination (this is assuming you are covered by the Equality Act) If they then sack you whilst you have raised the grievance and discrimination then that is a detriment and potentially another act of discrimination ie Victimisation.

 

Have you union cover or Legal Protection Insurance for employment disputes? (check home contents where they often are included) If so then definitely get that grievance in. One word of warning, grieving about management normally ends up with the victim losing their jobs, it is very stressful and can lead to more illness, trust me we have been there. So think carefully what you want to do and whether it is worth the trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you put a grievance in on all this? (I have only scanned previous post so forgive me if this is repeated) On your illness, have you had this for many years or is it a recent thing? The Equality Act 2010 protects people that have disabilities that have lasted 12 months, likely to last 12 months. The disability must affect the activities of daily living eg concentration memory, an ability to work. The fact that the employer has made you see their doctor who recommended a phesed return seems to suggect that they have discrimination issues at the back of their decision making.

 

You seem pessimistic about your chances of remaining in work. It seems to me that in these circumstances you should raise a grievance and allege discrimination, failing to make reasonable adjustments and indeed failing to observe their own policies. By raising a grievance in this manner you increase the anti by alleging discrimination (this is assuming you are covered by the Equality Act) If they then sack you whilst you have raised the grievance and discrimination then that is a detriment and potentially another act of discrimination ie Victimisation.

 

Have you union cover or Legal Protection Insurance for employment disputes? (check home contents where they often are included) If so then definitely get that grievance in. One word of warning, grieving about management normally ends up with the victim losing their jobs, it is very stressful and can lead to more illness, trust me we have been there. So think carefully what you want to do and whether it is worth the trouble.

 

Hi thanks for reply , I know this may sound strange after some of my earlier posts but it's now been 4 weeks and in this time I have been evaluating a lot of things and have come to the conclusion that I never want to work for these horrible people , they don't deserve my loyalty and commitment I have shown for past 8 years. As I am not looking to settle a dispute is it worth putting a grievance in ? Or is it something I should bring up at a later date ? I really do not see how they can dismiss me now for breach of health + safety , when the company have breached the H+S standards them selves by falsifying certificates to try and prove I had this training . So if they do not dismiss me I will resign and go for constructive dismissal, also if they are found to be neglectful in that they have abused there duty of care in failing to protect an employees mental health and a court deems it could have been avoided then they best start to worry as there is no limit to the compensation I can receive.

 

If it is summary dismissal, I will have 3 H+S training certificates with 1 witness statement and another included in minutes of meeting proving the company have falsified evidence and also certificates. Which I feel the health and safety executive will be interested to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have mentally had it with this firm and you leave and then go for CD your chances of winning are much less. if you have resolved to take them to ET and endure the stress, more illness and possibly financial perils it would be much better to put in a grievavce and allege discrimination as I said, along with anything else you can think of eg the breach of H & S, falsifying documents (which if you could prove it against any one person is a criminal offence) . CD is notorious for being hard to prove because you are the one that left. Better for the employer to take the horrible actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's now been 6 weeks from tge date I was suspended, 1 week on from disciplinary hearing and still no closer to any solution .

 

I have since found new employment and start on Monday but I am still going to fight to clear my name. If the company had not falsified evidence against me and my senior supervisor had not lied so much on his statements I would probably just let it go and move on.

 

I am determined to out these liars and if I can't do it I will go to HSE to investigate the fact that they have falsified training certificates.

 

I am now in no need to resign I will just let the company make the decision, then go for a compromised agreement.

 

Does anyone think I should wait or just go straight in for a compromised agreement before I know the outcome of disciplinary meeting. It's clear to see that the company have got themselves in a right mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I'm not sure you can ask for a compromise agreement, can you? Has the company suggested that to you, because my understanding is that they have to offer? Sorry if it's in your thread somewhere, I was off the interweb for some time and am not up to speed with all the threads.

 

I expect someone will correct me if I'm wrong about the CA.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been CAB and the employment lawyer there has mentioned that a CA is an option but it will let them off the hook in respect to health + safety documents. As I said I have found employment so this is not about getting my job back or to some extent money , it's about proving that people have broken the law, and are in breach of my contract as it states in my terms that I must sign and date any training i have done and as I ain't done the training I won't have signed for these. Am just so proud of myself for refusing to lie down and take this, although my psychiatrist has helped me alot through this process and have had some great advice from you guys on here I am still proud that I had the balls to stand up to these lying bastardos and present my case so well .

 

I would love a letter of apology off them that would be the icing on the cake

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been CAB and the employment lawyer there has mentioned that a CA is an option but it will let them off the hook in respect to health + safety documents. As I said I have found employment so this is not about getting my job back or to some extent money , it's about proving that people have broken the law, and are in breach of my contract as it states in my terms that I must sign and date any training i have done and as I ain't done the training I won't have signed for these. Am just so proud of myself for refusing to lie down and take this, although my psychiatrist has helped me alot through this process and have had some great advice from you guys on here I am still proud that I had the balls to stand up to these lying bastardos and present my case so well .

 

Today I got a phone call off work stating that they have come to the decision to give me a verbal warning ha ha are these guys for real? I have been suspended on full pay for gross misconduct and they give me a verbal warning .. Honestly you wouldn't think I worked for a global company.

 

They asked me to report for duty at 9am Monday morning , I will have to see my solicitor tomorrow and see what my options are as I will never be able to work with these people again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...