Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest preparing a stat demand HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bazooka, I can't believe that of you... You can't of had any DCA's for lunch. Yes count your right, an SD is a different animal to a CCJ.. In your circumstances you have nothing to fear, unless you have assets worth over approx £1,500 the official receiver would even allow you to keep your car if it is meant for work etc or cause's hardship I.E. running a sick family member to hospital every week or something to that effect, of course as long as it is not a top of the range beast worth thousands of pounds.

 

No a BR (stad demand) would not get a CCJ against you, they have to apply for a CCJ, that is a separate animal..... Of course if they do apply for a CCJ then if they are daft enough to make you Bankrupt later,,, bye bye CCJ it gets included in your bankruptcy...

 

As for attachment of earnings or bailiffs, this is dependant on you not paying what the court as ordered.... these are easily set a side and I know many people who have had CCJ's awarded against them and to be fair never paid a penny and have never heard from the Creditor again... Also if the award is too much you can apply for it to be varied to an amount that you feel is affordable.

 

The only time you may get a problem is if you own property,,, they could go for a charging order but hey it is a double edge sword and could work in your favour,,,, No judgement I have yet to hear as made a debtor sell there house,, you can stay put for as long as you like and even if you sell you do not need to notify the creditors its a minefield of If's but's how much they are intent on getting back there debt... Even if you go Bankrupt it does not necessarily mean you will loose your house,, Neg equity can put paid to that and if no rise in prices in two years then the OR usually discharges an interest in the property. Also you could get your wife or some third party to buy your beneficial interest in the profit of the house.... So really what have the DCA's got (NOTHING REALLY BUT PHISS AND WIND) and peoples ignorance and unless they bring back the debtors prisons (and with our prison population I doubt that very much) they are as a lot of people say on this site LAME DUCKS.

 

As you see, a lot of them are struggling with compliance and with a greater knowledge of peoples rights we will see a lot more whining from these pond life and lets see how many we can put out of business. There must be better way's to deal with peoples debts. In my mind the banks are to blame, and to try and turn a unsecured into a secured debt is just moving the goal post. They did not whinge when the going was good... So all in all,,,,,, Your the boss on how you pay back your debts (SIMPLES)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well the Stat Demand arrived today by 1st class post, it is dated 2/6/11. The only defence I've got is an unenforceable agreement. So how should I proceed.

Thanks for any advice.

 

Debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the Stat Demand arrived today by 1st class post, it is dated 2/6/11. The only defence I've got is an unenforceable agreement. So how should I proceed.

Thanks for any advice.

 

Debbie

Hi Debbie If it came 1ST class post !! I wouldnt even bother getting Set aside!! I had one delievered the same way !! nothing has came of it..Just a scare tactic and dishing them out like confetti!! And at the end of the day ..WHAT SD..Whos to say you ever received it!!!! Cost nothing for them to send SDs out!! ;) If they Meant Business they would of had a process server deleiver it on you for you to sign !! IMO its invalid already coz it wasnt served the correct way ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of questions. If I ignore the Stat Demand is there a time frame for them to petition for my bankruptcy. If they don't go for bankruptcy can they issue another Stat Demand sometime in the future.

 

Thanks

 

Debbie

 

I think they can issue for BR within 4 mths of sending ..and yes they can issue another!! if they had any ace cards up their sleve they would use them the correct way ..thats MO ..You hav to do what you wish at the end of day !! im sure more CAGGERs will hav diff views :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi

 

 

Capquest have gone a little quiet now so think it is about time you reported them to the OFT if you haven’t done so already.

 

 

Please bear in mind that the template letter on the first page of this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk...=1#post3422496

 

may not be suitable for all and you will have to adapt it to your own circumstances I.E

You applied to get it set asidelink3.gif and CQ didn't turn up

You applied and CQ agreed to discontinue

You ignored and CQ did nothing

 

 

Today the OFT set out some new guidance and sending SD's as a debt collectionlink3.gif tool is now frowned upon.

If you want to read it, here's the link

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/con.../OFT664Rev.pdf

 

You can complain by email and the OFT will email you back a form to sign and post back to them for them to be able to add your complaint to their list.

 

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/contactus;jses...1D83BF00 04F6EA

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...