Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


86 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. i was reading some BP guidance on the requirement re 10 minutes grace periods , i will do as you all suggest and sit tight . thanks for the guidance, its much appreciated
  2. they claimed the vehicle was parked without permission , and is the car park for patrons only is pretty much the flavour of it
  3. i did indeed , 18:17: 37 to 18:18:06. So i shouldn't appeal , is there anything i should be doing or do i just wait and see what they do next ?
  4. Hi all. i received a PCN notice to keeper from euro parking services and the appeal deadline is 10/03/21. i had intentions of dealing with this sooner but the sudden death of a close family member side swiped me and i have only just got to a position where i am able to spend time on this. i wish to appeal this charge and i am looking for some guidance on what should be stated in my initial appeal to the issuer. I have completed the questions below in the hope that some one can offer some guidance thanks in advance. For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] 1 Date of the infringement 18/02/21 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 23/02/21 [scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please do not put JPG Picture files into your post 3 Date received 25/02/21 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes, two pictures supplied, one entry and one exit timed at 29 seconds apart 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] not yet , deadline is 10/03.21 , not been able to attend to this sooner due the bereavement of a close family memeber Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here 7 Who is the parking company? Euro Parking services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Shoulder of Mutton , Birmingham For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS
  5. i have exactly the same situation, i had one charge that occured as i went over my limit, and for the four subsequent months i stayed within my limits but application of the charges caused further charges, and to make matters worse i do not receive notification of what and when will be taken as they keep sending correspondence to my old adress of 2 years ago, even though they have my new on and even though i have complained and pointed this out... they have taken around £500 from me in that time
  6. i have recently recived exactly the same communication from them relating to a statute barred account. I have been pondering on whether to ignore it or send teh statute barred letter...
  7. as the intercoms etc have to be cosntantly attended, it would be a reasonable adjustment to allow you to perform this function and for the other staff to cover the remainder of the duties, as per the previous arangement/adjustment. It would appear this adjustment is still possible , and it would therefor seem difficult for your employer to defend not doing so.
  8. as cardiffboy said, if they forced you to take the holiday it would be a diifferent story, but by offering you the choice i think they are covered and i dont think you will have much come back in that respect unfortunately. the previous sick pay entitlement which was removed was not contractual from what you have said, and would be considered discretionary, so no potential for breach of contract. Might be worth a call to ACAS to get their veiw
  9. Hi Surfer, it is generally advisable for employers to agree a timetable of repayments and not deduct more than a reaonable portion from an employees pay packet.
  10. HI PMSC69 employers dont necessarily have to provide sick pay above the minimum level of SSP, i.e contractual or company sick pay, although they still have a legal obligation to pay a certain level of sick pay to employees who are off due to ill health or injury under the social security and benefits act 1992 and the statutory sick pay regulations...in other words SSP. SSP is payable for up to 28 weeks, i think the current rate is £79.15 per week. there are certain qualifying requirements such as you must be an employee, you must be ill and unable to work for 4 days or more... in respect to being forced to take sick leave as holiday, and employer cannot force you to do this, however as ann employee you have the right may request to take holiday leave during a period of sick leave, following recent rulings in the ECJ
  11. Hi Allwood, its is still unclear what the exact nature of your partners condition is as you have not specifically stated this , therefor that is making it more difficult for us to advise you on whether it is covered by DDA. You mentioned that it is likely to get worse which suggests a progressive condition. such progressive conditions may be automatically covered i.e MS, others may be covered the point where the progression of the condition falls under the long term adverse effect although assessment of this may still be required.... in respect to what happens if you bring a claim, if your partner is then viticimised for excercisng a protected right then there could be a victimisation claim to answer, as per section 55 of the Disability Discrimination Act
  12. Hi Allwood, from your last post its sounds as though they agree yoru partner has an underlying health issue, although that does not necessarily mean it would be covered by the Disability Discrimination Act It would be good for us to establish if the health issue is likely to come under DDA as this would put your in a much stronger position re the reasonable adjustments, we would need an idea of what your partners condition is to determine that..Some things are automatically covered, for instance MS, cancer, HIV, whereas some conditions need to be assessed to determine if there is a substantial and long term effect to establish if they are covered...or at what point they become covered..
  13. ref the deifinition of disability, under the Disability Discrimination Act, a disability is defined as " a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long term effect on a persons ability to carry out normal day to day activities" normal day to day activites inlcude mobility manual dexterity physical co-ordination continence ability to lift, carry or otherwise move everyday objects speech , hearing or eyesight memory or ability to concentrate, learn or understand perception of risk of physical danger It if often possible for employers to establish themselves whether an individual is likely to be covered by the act based on the illness or condition they have and act acordingly if they believe they are covered. If there is any doubt as to whether they are covered by the act, then as scousegeezer says they could obtain a medical report from her gp under the Access to Medical Recorts Act to establish the nature of the illness and whether the person is likely to be covered by the act. Its not clear from your posts what condition your partner has, has the employer obtained medical reports, and what adjustments did they put in place?.. maybe you could give us an indication of this if your partner is covered by the act, and they have not made reasonable adjustments, and they are not prepared to discuss any further adjustments , then the next course of action would be an ET
  • Create New...