Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

#bailiffs : bailiff coming to clear goods, help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4759 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

Just to update. The bailiff didn't turn up on Tuesday and haven't heard anything from him or the council so I assume that everything is going to be fine, who knows, but I'll keep updating as soon as I have any news. thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to jump in on this thread but im wondering if some kind soul could give me advise... to cut a long story short link have a default judgment and i have a ccg for an old abbey national debt in 2002. to be honest ive buried my head in the sand with this due to depression. marriage broken down etc. im a singe mum to 4 on income support on medication for depression high blood pressure and asthmatic..the monthly amount 291.77 which no way i can pay got a letter the other day notice of warrant of execution whatever that is saying bailiff is visiting if not paid by 5th may...im not bothered they can take what they like as i have nothing of value.. infact im at rock bottom the only thing stressing me is my brother has loaned my 13 year old daughter a computer as her laptop broke... this is for her schoolwork and he wants it back as soon as i can afford to get her laptop fixed.. any advise i would be gratefull for

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, you can apply to the court on an N245 form to have the warrant suspended and pay a reduced amount each month that you can afford. Normally there is a fee of £35 to pay when you put the form in, but if you are on benefits then you will most likely be exempt.

 

I have affixed an N244 form and also the court fees leaflet so you can see if you are exempt. If you need help filling in the form, let me know. Could you take it along to the court before the 5th ?

 

How much was the CCJ for and what date was it ?

EX160.pdf

ex160a court fees.pdf

n245_0204.pdf

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

well, I've received a letter today from R&C. Im going to copy here what it says omitting names.

 

"Our Bailiff Mr G made an initial visit to your property on 15 march at 10:08 and a second visit on 16 march at 14:47. The first visit incurred a fee of £24.50 and the second visit incurred a fee of £18.

 

On 19 april our enforcement bailiff Mr R attended your property at 11:39. At this time Mr R levied on your vehicle in order to secure the debt for our Client , XXXX District Council. A levy fee and an attendance fee were added to your account at the time of this visit

 

A breakdown of charges is as follows:

 

21/02 debt 138.42

15/03 Visit 1 24.50

16/03 visit 2 18.00

19/04 Attendance fee 150

19/04 Levy fee 27 "

 

This is all very weird as I haven't got any notice of any previous visits, no letters or else. another one he said he levied on my car. How does he know which one is my car I didn't drive it that day and is now parked 2 streets away from my flat.

 

I have settled my debt with the council already. Is there anything else I can do??

 

 

PS: I have been working only weekends for the past 4 months so I spend most mornings at home up until 16:00 and I don't recall any bailiff knocking on my door on the 15/03 or 16/03 and I have no letters from them. Could this be a dirty trick to try to get more money off me???

Edited by surtinerfe
Link to post
Share on other sites

Put them to strict proof of their attendance and remind them of the National Standards for Enforcement that state:

Enforcement agents will on each and every occasion when a visit is made to a debtor's property which incurs a fee for the debtor, leave a notice detailing the fees charged to date, including the one for that visit, and the fees which will be incurred if further action becomes necessary. If a written request is made an itemised account of fees will be provided.

They will argue that these Standards are only guidelines and not Law but I do imagine both Bailiffs and Council have said they will abide by them.

 

As regards the "alleged" levy then Regulation 45 Para 5 of the CT Regs states:

(5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into.

If you have had no Notice of Seizure and remember this was when you opened the door to him then I would argue they have no levy but have made these fees up because you paid in full 2 days later. Even if they have made a levy I suspect it will have been any car parked near your home not necessarily your own. very suspect they do not mention it specifically.

 

PT

  • Confused 1

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also when push comes to shove they can't charge a levy fee and an attendance fee at the same time.

 

PT

 

Thanks for your advice again ploddertom. I have emailed them requesting proof of attendance, I haven't got a reply yet.

 

I have received a reply from the council revenues and benefits officer today which says:

 

Dear Mr XXX

 

I have advised our bailiffs Rundle & Co that you have made full payment to clear the balance on the account. The payment made has put the account into credit by £26.06. This amount will be passed over to Rundle and Co to reduce the fees outstanding with them. You will need to contact Rundle and Co in order to make an arrangement with them in order to clear the remaining balance of fees outstanding with them.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Mr XXX

Revenues and Benefits Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe the audacity of this company.

 

They actually state in writing (yet again) that they levy and attend to remove at the same time!

 

Yet again we must ask: if the goods were there to effect a levy, and the bailiffs were equipped and intending to remove....

 

why are the goods still there?

 

Answers on a postcard please.

 

You owe: £24.50 first visit + £27 levy fee - £26.06 credit = £25.54

 

I'd pay that ASAP or they can come back and add the attending to remove fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe the audacity of this company.

 

They actually state in writing (yet again) that they levy and attend to remove at the same time!

 

Yet again we must ask: if the goods were there to effect a levy, and the bailiffs were equipped and intending to remove....

 

why are the goods still there?

 

Answers on a postcard please.

 

You owe: £24.50 first visit + £27 levy fee - £26.06 credit = £25.54

 

I'd pay that ASAP or they can come back and add the attending to remove fee.

 

 

How do I know they are not bluffing about the levy?? I don't really want to pay more than I should. It's been quite a few weeks already and they haven't done anything not even replied to the email I sent questioning their chargers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send Rundle & Co an e-mail tell them you will pay all lawful fees due when they provide proof of attendance regarding 1st&2nd visit fees this being a screenshot of your account and a copy of the notice seizure you will not however be paying the attendance fee as there is no provision under regulation 45 schedule 5 of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement Regulations )1992(Amended) for such a fee

 

Also send a copy of your e-mail to

Mr XXX

Revenues and Benefits Officer

Edited by hallowitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

What's written on the liability order the Council obtained is all you owe. Not a penny more. If the Council has settled it will be for that amount. The rest are fees the bailiff can ask for but which he does not have any court authority or court document to collect.

 

He's miffed because you went to the Council and paid direct - thus cutting him out and depriving him of the commission that he thinks he should have.

 

Take no notice of anything he says in future and he if he does comes round, just stare coldly at him through the window. That way he will know that his intimidation has failed. Without that he has nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would still video him if he visits in case he tries to clamp a car or levy for his fees alone, which he cannot legally do.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also keep your car well away from your property in the meantime it wont be the first bailiff to drive by a property and pick a car to levy and they may be lucky and see you getting in or out of yours

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth you asking what they belive to have levied on as they said they had ;levied on my car but had right car just wrote down wrong reg so therefore the levy was not a lawful one

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello everyone

 

I've got a reply from R&C by post today which says as follow:

 

" On reviewing your account we are satisfied that the charges applied to your account and the information contained in our letter to you dated 4 may 2011 are correct.

 

Our bailiff levied in good faith on a vehicle he believed to be yours.

 

However, as the outstanding debt has been paid in full to our client XXX District Council I have as a gesture of goodwill removed the bailiff charges from your account and I can confirm this is now paid in full and you will receive nothing further from us in relation to this matter.

 

I trust this clarifies our position

 

Yours sincerely

 

blablablabla"

 

So I guess that I can say that the case is closed!!!.

 

guys you are incredible I can't thank you enough for all the support and help you've given me, really pleased.

 

ps: Is there anyway I could make a donation to the forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very pleased to hear you have had a result. Sounds as if what should have been written was:

S**t caught out again better say the usual - goddwill etc

 

If they did it right in the first place then this would not have happened.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done another result for CAG

there used to be a link to make a donation but i don't see it if you click on the triangle and ask site team they will help you

 

 

 

S**t caught out again better say the usual - goddwill etc

 

your right there PT

Link to post
Share on other sites

definitely CAG power. they should close the citizens advice centre in my town as the only thing they did was to send me a link and told me to read through and that my best bet was to pay in full

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...