Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Indemnity


Shellyo1o
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks.

 

I bought a house with a partner, we split, house got repossesed.

 

The mortgage co. could not find me ex, so they came to me for the £22,000 shortfall.

 

As I was a single parent at the time they were not too hard on me, they agreed to me only be liable for half the debt and I agreed to pay £15 per month.

 

This has been going on for about 6 years now.

 

Last year I got a letter from Curtis soliciters claiming I owe them £5000+ for a mortgage indemnity. Apparantly the mortage company took out a MIG and when the house was repossesed they got £5000 from it, now the insurers want me to pay them the £5000.

I wrote to them last year and asked for some sort of agreement signed by me as I knew nothing about it, they replied that it wasn't that sort of agreement!

I filled in a budget planner for them, but my husband refuses to have anything to do with this debt as it was before I met him (I don't blame him either), so I just put my salary down and offered a token payment of £5 per month, which they refused, asking for £300 per month instead. After a lot of tooing and froing they sent me what looked like a petetion for bankrupcy.

I went to my local CAB and they advised me to let them make me bankrupt, as I have no property or asesst, and it would also clear my mortgage and credit card debt.

So I did nothing.

That was last October. After hearing nothing for nearly a year they have written to me again saying my £5 offer is not acceptable and they need more information about my financial situation.

 

If anyone can give me any advice on this I would be very grateful.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

All lenders take out an MI policy which you pay for in your monthly repayment

 

As this is unusual you need to tell us what evidence you have that they agreed to you only owing 1/2 the debt.

 

Sending the petition for bankrupcy was at the time only an attempt to frighten you. Anyone can get the form fill it in & send it to the debtor.

 

Scares the hell out of them, unless of course they are a member of this site

 

By the way tell your present husband that any adverse info recorded against you will also affect his credit worthiness

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Joncris.

 

The bank agreed that I was only liable for half the debt, there is a note on the banks records about it, as when I rang to query soemthing last year the girl on the phone knew all about it, and also said she could send a letter to me saying as much if I needed it.

 

And yes, the bankrupcy petition did scare the hell out of me!!

 

Any idea on what I should do going forward with this?

Can they claim this from me if I havn't signed an agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bank drew down on the MI then the insurance company has every right to chase you.

 

You don't sign any agreement as the lender takes out the insurance & uses it in the event of an equity loss causing a reduced sale price.

 

Much like if another car driver hits you they do not have to have been a signatory to YOUR insurance agreement for you to recover your losses. After paying you out your insurance company will then look to recover their losses from the negligent other driver.

 

You need to recontact the bank & explain what has happened Also notify the insurance company what your doing (You could send a CCA demand) as the bank by agreeing to 1/2 may have breached their contract with the insurer who, although doubtful, could in turn demand their 5K back from the bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

OKay Joncris - thanks for the advice.

 

Does seem a bit daft the insurance company paying the bank then asking me to pay them - they have a win win situation - they get premiums AND they claim back what they payout, can't see why the bank just didn't add it on to my debt and save on the premiums. :rolleyes:

 

I'm a bit dubious about contacting the bank, they may go back on our agreement and hit me for the 22k loss, instead of 11k as agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...