Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help! Are the same rules applied to disabled parking in ncp multi storey as on the highway?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4651 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone

 

Please does anyone know whether the same rules apply in a multi storey car park for parking in a disabled bay as on the highway? I am disabled and parked in the disabled bay and paid for my parking(£9.80). Unfortunately my disabled badge was out of date, but I did not think that in a multi storey car park it would be the same rules as the highway? I paid for my parking, I was not trying to evade payment, just to indicate that I was disabled. I was in agony and I wanted to park as near to the lift as possible. Normally I would have taken my daughter with me to assist, but it was Christmas Eve, shopping had to be done and she had been admitted to hospital following a massive asthma attack and we were unsure whether she would be home for Christmas. Therefore, I was left to do the last minute shopping by myself. What a lovely present to come back to after a long, painful shop, for which I paid?

 

The sign said "Ristricted parking disabled badge holders only", unlike some that say "valid" badge holders. I am a badge holder, just an out of date one!

 

Any thoughts would be very much appreciated. I have tried to appeal and they are not having any of it. I have explained the circumstances and they do not care.

 

I have just had to pay a ticket in a council car park for not being exactly in the white lines (free parking with a disc) and I loathe to be caught out again for a minor issue. I could not park in my white lines because the car adjacent was squint and over my lines!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your swift response. :-)

 

It is NCP on behalf of council?

 

JQ

 

So it's a council car park... where is it?

 

Please Note

 

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disabled bays have no legal standing on a private car park so the fact that your badge has expired is irrelevant. What have you been issued with and how much is the 'charge?'

 

Also, thank you for your swift response! :-)

 

In the Notice of Rejection "Parked in a designated disabled persons parking space without displaying a valid disabled persons badge in the prescribed manner" I cannot remember what it specified on the ticket I have put it in a safe place and cannot find it!! They checked to see whether it was in date!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it's a council car park... Where is it?

 

please note

 

 

the advice i offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

 

 

 

i would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

 

please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

worthing west sussex!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disabled bays have no legal standing on a private car park so the fact that your badge has expired is irrelevant. What have you been issued with and how much is the 'charge?'

 

 

Oh and it is £70, which will become £105 if not paid or appealed!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it say "Traffic Management Act 2004" anywhere?

 

Hi Al27

 

Yes it does, it states Re: Notice of Rejection of Representations - Traffic Management Act 2004 - s78; Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regs 2007; Civl Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007.

 

It also states that my representations were considered in accordance with the said act and that the PCN was correctly issued and legally served in accordance with Reg 9 of the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regs 2007.

 

Sounds all very legal and above board, albeit in my opinion, jolly unfair. :-( Do you have any ideas?

 

JQ

Edited by jqinfo
Added a bit.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some councils are often no better than private companies dishing out fake invoices and disallow all appeals as a matter of course.

 

We need to see scans of all the paperwork and photos of the car park would be useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some councils are often no better than private companies dishing out fake invoices and disallow all appeals as a matter of course.

 

We need to see scans of all the paperwork and photos of the car park would be useful.

 

Thank you. I will scan in paperwork tomorrow, when I have worked out how to blank out the details!! I know how to change a word doc &then save as pdf, but I have a page of photos from council & I assume I will have to scan in as a pdf, which I will not be able to change? Or am I being a bit dim? Then I will work out how to upload them. Lol!

 

Thank you for your input thus far.

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of creating a pdf, can you scan it and save it as a picture format such as gif, jpeg, etc? Or if you have to save it as a pdf, can you then open it and save it as a picture format?

 

If you can, then you should have Paint installed on your PC. Open it with that, and erase, or draw a box over the top of whatever you want to hide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

I have tried to attach the photos, letters etc and below is my email representation:-

 

Dear Sirs

 

I write regarding the above numbered PCN to request that it be reviewed. I am charged with my blue badge being obscured. I did hastily display my badge on the dashboard, almost throwing my blue clock up too, not actually realising that I needed to be as vigilant about placing my badge as clearly as one does on the street. I thought in a multi storey car park it would be more about showing that I was disabled than being exactly as one must on the street, because it is not a public highway?

 

My apologies for not understanding the situation, but my main thought at the time was to be as near to a lift and central as possible for ease of shopping. Normally I would have my daughter with me to do the physical stuff, but she had been admitted to the Acute Medical Ward in St Richard's Hospital in Chichester following an acute asthma attack. She was kept in on oxygen, a nebuliser and steroids etc etc. This left me to sort out the shopping by myself in total agony. This was not what we had expected and coupled with the worry of my daughter's poor health and whether she would actually be at home for Christmas, I had to physically do all the things that she was going to do with me, by myself. I did not check the position of my badge before leaving the car, as I explained I thought it was more about showing I am disabled rather than a legal requirement as is required on the highways.

 

I did pay £9.60 for my parking, as per ticket no 6201/055282800/016203. I did not try to evade paying, nor intend to park illegally. I was in agony and I had to park as centrally as possible, because I knew it was going to be a long, arduous, pain filled shopping trip, with no assistance and I had to make the best of the situation! I wanted everything done so that if they did let my daughter home for Christmas, she would not feel obliged to try and help. As it was they eventually let her home later on Christmas Eve with strict instructions as to her breathing and medicine. Her condiiton was dangerous and any minor deterioration would involve an immediate return to hospital; and judging by today's standard, she may well be back in this evening!

 

Please review this ticket and realise I did not intend to do any harm, I just wanted to indicate that I was disabled and that is why I parked there at put my badge up as I did. I nearly did not put my blue clock up, because I did not see it necessary when I was paying for my parking and I could stay as long as I wanted. There was no restriction/time limit to which I had to adhere, so I did not deem it necessary, but just popped it up at the last minute. Thank goodness I did or that would have been another contravention!

 

Please have some compassion for an already stressed, painstricken person facing an awful Christmas with an extremely sick daughter and please cancel this ticket.

 

Many thanks.

 

Kind regards.

 

 

I hope it has worked? Any comments much appreciated!

 

JQ :???:

PCN NOTICE OF REJECTION OF REPRESENTATION PAGE 1 BLANKED.jpg

PCN NOTICE OF REJECTION OF REPRESENTATION PAGE 2.doc

PCN NOTICE OF REJECTION OF REPRESENTATION PAGE 3.doc

PCN NOTICE TO OWNER BLANKED.jpg

scan0006 PARKING TICKET PHOTOS BLANKED.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello & thank you for your response. I don't have a good memory due to a brain issue, but I thought the original ticket was for the badge not being correctly displayed because the clock coveted the date. However, I can't remember where I put the ticket! :-(

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh & yes it was out of date, but becsuse I wasn't on the highway I didn't think it mattered, I had to pay & there was no limit to how long I could park!

 

Perhaps I was stupid, I don't know? Am I the only person who thought that way? I thought it was a private car park & thus was not "policed" in the same manner. I thought it was convenience to park nearest the lift, I didn't think it was law! Not only that most of the spaces were empty!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most Councils would usually cancel on susequent production of the badge to show it was valid, but as it wasn't that wouldn't apply and if cynical they'll probably think you covered it to hide the fact that it was expired. The best thing to do is check the traffic order for the car park to see if it states a valid badge must be displayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I have just found my Blue Badge Scheme Booklet that came with my disabled badge and quoted under No 6 Where The Scheme Does Not Apply, it states "The scheme does not apply in off-street car parks". Therefore, does this mean that I have been charged erroneously??

 

Furthermore, the only mention of misuse or criminal offences is with regard to those who ARE NOT disabled. Not those who are and do not have a valid badge! My badge may have expired, but my Disability Living Alllowance is awarded indefinitely. So, not only did I pay for my parking, I am disabled and displayed a badge albeit out of date, it appears that I am actually being penalised for being disabled and parking near the lift?

 

Please may I have some comments on this, because if this guide is correct my badge is not valid in the car park anyway?

 

 

JQ :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is a council car park then that council would have applied an off- street traffic order thus making the blue-badge scheme operable in this car-park.

Edited by DBC
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that DBC, do you know if this has always been the case?

 

Surely if this is possible then it should be explained in the rule book? I thought I was within the rules of the scheme, as I interpreted it and as it did not have any further explanation visible in the car park or an update in the law notified to me, how could I possibly be aware of that?

 

JQ :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is a council car park then that council would have applied an off- street traffic order thus making the blue-badge scheme operable in this car-park.

 

Hello again DBC

 

I have just come across the Thornton V Shoe Lane case, does this apply to my ticket if the correct signage of the requirements of the blue badge scheme are not displayed readily and I have entered via a barrier ticket machine outside on the road and then inside the multistorey car park I have parked, thinking it is not the same as parking on the highway; and as per my blue badge scheme indicates?

 

Thank you for your input.

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Personally I think you are bang to rights, the badge was 3 months out of date and does look like you deliberately obscured the date to avoid a PCN (even if that wasn't the case). http://tro.parking-adjudication.gov.uk/files/WU01.pdf the TRO seems to back up the PCN so cannot really see a way out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...