Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last month was confirmed to be the hottest-ever May on record, in terms of global average temperatures, completing an entire calendar year of month-by-month records.  The average temperature last month was 1.52C above the pre-industrial average, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, known as C3S. The average global temperature for the 12-month period to the end of May was 1.63C (2.9F) above the pre-industrial average
    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 17/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest - robbersWay Chasing old disputed debt


Goatan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been arguing with natwest about a default notice they have placed on my file for a disputed debt. I would like to know if they can do this whilst the the debt is in default and is this letter a valid default letter.

It has made me remove the link anyone know how i can show you this letter without using a link or picture?

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Once you reach 20 posts, you will be able to post up pictures. You already have 16, Wander around the forum and see where you can add snippets of information then try again

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to much i can offer at the moment except moral support but will see what i can do.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

natwest0003.jpg

 

Seems i have now made enough posts to post a picture.

can any tell me if this is a correct default

my main concern is that there seems to be no figures and there was no attached notice as it says.

natwest0004.jpg

 

arrgh anyon know how to get the pictures the right size?

Edited by Goatan
pictures to small

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Im just recently gota letter for Robinson way limited who are chasing a debt with NatWest

trouble is the majority of the debt is disputed and is currently being investigated by the FOS

 

what should i send the Robinson way to get them to back off.

also the amount they are asking for is well above the disputed amount.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No part of the debt is an overdraft that i was paying off happily and will do again once they acknowledge their mistake.

The majority though is fraud that the bank allowed to take place despite getting the card cancelled and warning them that i suspect fraud might take place.

 

I didn't think bank charges where disputable anymore.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a good point i do have a crime ref number.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter sent lets see what they say after that.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An update to all this,

 

despite me making Robinson way aware of what was going on they have sent another letter threatening a doorstep visit.

 

Unfortunately like a Muppet I didn’t keep a copy of my last letter so I don’t feel I can complain to the OFT about them this time.

 

However I am going to send the standard CAG letter to ward off their visit along with this.

 

The total of this debt is disputed by myself due to NatWest allowing fraud to be carried out after they were warned of the potential for fraud and my card being cancelled.

 

As you are aware from my previous letter this is currently being investigated by the FOS and the police as a crime (ref: XXXXXX) which NatWest my well has been an unwitting accessory to.

 

The OFT makes it clear that it is unfair to continue collection whilst a debt is in dispute which this debt clearly is.

 

Until the FOS and police report back I will not enter into any further conversations with you and I will raise a complaint with the OFT as I would consider your continued attempts to collect a disputed debt that is under investigation by the OFT to be vexatious and unfair and possibly subject to legal action due to harassment.

 

Please do Let me know what you think of it.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh very definitely

 

my plan to do that just annoying and a little bit worrying if my Mum answers she has tendency to panic at official looking things and might pay thinking that she's helping.

 

I have made her aware of what she should do .

 

Forgot to say as well I actually got 2 letters from them with the same date.

 

One saying we want all the money and we will send a local rep.

 

The other one offering a substantial discount, no details just says a substantial discount they don’t sound completely confident of their position.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbersway are the leaders in circus events who tour this country, if they are so inept and uneducated as to send some total moron to your address who even feels like they some how have one iota of legal nous to be asking a stranger for money, then it is solely up to you how you deal with such an imbecile, your choice of words and actions are of your own doing!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK an update on this Robinsons way still have sent me letters including another doorstep colection threat. (i have the video camera battery on chrage for that :madgrin: ) Which is the most appropriate/best agency to?

 

durrr which is the best agency to complaign to?

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT&TS via http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

 

Financial Ombudsman http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/complaints.htm

 

Local MP http://www.writetothem.com/

 

Media http://www.bbc.co.uk/watchdog/gotastory/

 

Obviously keep copies of their tame letters, send copies to the above if requested, and there is nothing else to do except IGNORE robbersway, all they can do is continue sending more deforestation including empty threats, if anyone purporting to be from this hilarious outfit does decide to grace you with their presence, then the length of time for them to remove themselves from your property should be the only words that leave your lips! Swiftly followed by the slam of the door.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Draft of the copmlaint im goign to send out any comments welcome.

 

I wish to complain about the company trading as Robinson Way. They are chasing me for a disputed debt on behalf of NatWest the reason the debt is disputed is NatWest failed to cancel a debit card after I warned them about the possibility of fraud. They subsequently passed the cost of this fraud onto me despite it being there fault. This fraud and copmlaint against NatWest is currently under investigation by the financial ombudsman and police (police ref: ). I have informed Robinson way of this but they have ignored my correspondence and continue to send letters demanding payment for this disputed debt and threatening visits to my postal address which is actually owned by my parents and would cause them distress as well as embarrassment for me.

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/madam,

 

I wish to make a formal complaint about Natwest and their chosen third party debt collection agency 'Robinson Way'.

 

The bank was informed by myself od DD/MM/YYYY that I believed there would be fraudulent activity on my account, I therefore closed this in order to prevent any such activity.

However the bank for some unknown and unexplained reason, allowed fraudulent activity to be carried out on the account I had closed, and as such, feel that they somehow have authority to chase me for this money that was taken from the account.

 

The actions of their chosen third party debt collection agency leaves a lot to be desired, and is a reflection of the banks customer service, I will hold Natwest responsible for any and every threat intimidation and personal abuse that may be used by Robinson Way.

 

I have a Police incident reference number for this clear case of fraud (123456) The FOS is also investigating the matter, yet Natwest along with Robinson Way still feel it necessary to blatantly disregard and continue to attempt to threaten and intimidate me by way of written correspondence.

 

Whilst these tactics may have worked on others in the past, until the FOS and the Police have carried out their investigations, I will not entertain the bank or this Robins way outfit, I will continue to log all calls and maintain my diary of events with a view to seeking legal advice and taking action against the bank and their chosen third party DCA if they continue to pursue me when I am not liable.

  • Confused 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it thank you Bazooka Boo

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give it a few tweaks here and there, my head isn't as quick today so not my best!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats cool still better than mine :)

  • Haha 1

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

many moons ago I had a problem with NatWest and a payday loan they had paid despite me cancelling the debit card. after an initial complaint they reversed the payment but a few weeks later they re did the payment or should I say payments as they were taken in 7 chunks of £100. Anyway I went through their complaints procedure with no joy then the FOS who just rubber stamped their decision and thought that was that as i could not pay anything back at the time the account had massive charges and went into default.

 

Just a few days ago i saw this BBC article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19598492 -which should probably grace the CAG front page as i bet it would be useful to a few cagers- which explicitly states that the banks cannot just make a payment to a payday loan company or anyone else against my will and how the banks are unsurprisingly still ignoring the law on this.

Anyway as I now realise that the bank was wrong and the FOS was wrong i was wondering how i go about taking them to court. Would it be simply a case of taking them to small claims to get the money and charges refunded so that the default would be taken off?

Currently Pursuing three credit card companies for PPI and charges.

 

Capital one: Sent the required SAR information late, currently working out my claim.

Egg: Sent the required SAR information on time, curently working out my claim.

Virgin/MBNA: Still waiting less than week left to copmly with SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...