Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you mean you did aos on mcol yes? pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.   dx  
    • The Letter of Claim information is not absolutely essential, but it would be useful for two reasons. Firstly, judges take a dim view of companies or individuals who rush to court without giving the other party notice and a chance to settle - the Letter of Claim.  If they didn't send it we could include this point in your defence and it would be detrimental to them. Secondly, we know Countrywide.  They are a very small cowboy company.  The are reluctant to do court, simply becasue they are very bad  at it.  Their record of beating Caggers in front of a judge is exactly 0%.  They have lost every time.  They send the Letter of Claim also to look for people who don't reply, thinking that the person might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  Conclusion - always best to reply to a Letter of Claim and ridicule the PPC's case.
    • Any update here? I ask as we have someone in a similar situation.
    • It's possible.   I suffer from ADHD and also anxiety and depression currently and struggle with paperwork.  I'll have a search around to see if i can find anything.  If they did send something I haven't replied.   I thought there's no way that they will pursue this because I know for a fact i didn't park in a private space and the evidence they have sent is so ridiculous.   What impact does this other paperwork have? Thanks!   I already sent the acknowledgement as i panicked and thought today was the last day to respond.   Then i remembered this wonderful forum.  I'll follow the steps in the sticky next.
    • The particulars of claim doesn’t mention statement of accounts.  Should I include that in the cpr letter?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Baliff Charges For Non Payment Of Business Rates Time Running Out PLEASE HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. I hope someone can give me some help with baliffs charges. I have until the end of the week to pay.

I was visited by a Baliff on 1st Feb 2011. I had missed a couple of payments of business rates in December2010 after making an arrangement with the council in June 2010.

He told me he was there to seize goods. After discussion he said he would give me till the end of the month (feb). I now have the money to pay the bill but noticed his charges (although not as big as some ive seen) seems a bit high. He completed a walking possession.

It states. Outstanding debt £2400. First visit fee is blank. Second visit fee is blank. Levy fee £82. Walking possession blank. Other £200. Total £2682.00.

I had paid £300 the day before his visit, so the actual amount should be reduced by £300.

Can anyone tell me if the charges of £82 and £200 are justified. I only received the 1 visit.

Also, should i pay the baliff or pay the council online as i normally do with business rates?

Im worried that if i didnt pay the baliff charges and only paid the outstanding debt, that i may get a second visit. Time is against me. Please help. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law prescribing bailiffs fees for collecting unpaid business rates is Regulation 3© of the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations 1993 and The Council Tax and Non-Domestic Rating (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2006, broadly speaking it provides

 

1st Visit £24.50

2nd Visit £18.00

Sum recovered up to £100 - £15.00

£100 to £400 - 4%

£400 to £1500 - 2.5%

£1500 to £8000 - 1%

£8000 and above Quarter of - 1%

 

The bailiff can charge "reasonable costs" for transporting goods, but if he fails to show a breakdown or sales invoices for the work done then its £0.00. If a bailiff charges for work he hasnt done then he commits an offence: More: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldhansrd/text/70420w0001.htm see under Crime Fraud

 

Pay the council direct. There is no law saying you have to trade with a bailiff.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as if he has charged a levy fee when he has visited which is correct - the £82. The other fee is almost certainly an enforcement/van fee which he is trying to charge at the same time - this is not allowed and must be challenged. The problem with the challenging it is it will probably incur another visit which will probably attract another charge.

 

You say you owed £2400 is this the sum confirmed by the Council for the Liability Order. If it is and you have paid £300 since you should now only owe £2100. I would ring the Council and confirm what details they have such as:

1 - how much the original Liability Order is for

2 - how much is still outstanding

3 - do they pay the Bailiff fees or are you responsible for paying that afterwards

 

Come back with an answer to those and we'll see which is the best way to proceed.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this situation i usually recommend paying ALL that is asked for to halt any further visits, then claim it back.

 

Correct me if i'm wrong, but it seems than on the WPO you have written proof of the visit, levy and 'van fee' on the same day, so should be straight forward.

 

I would also caution that unless you have the 'end of the month' as a due date in writing, that the bailiff may appear at any time in the next week.

In which case you will owe a van fee, because it will be your word against his re. the 'end of the month' agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Thank you for replies. Council confirmed i owe them £2100 and i can pay online. But i should also pay baliff fees to the baliffs. Its a good point that there is nothing in writing about giving me till end of month.

To confirm, £2100 is the amount the council want, £82 is levy and £200 other is probably the van charge.

The baliff could turn up for a second visit if i dont pay their fees, so i think i had better pay up and try to get back.? Or should i pay them what i believe is a true cost in the hope that they have no grounds for a second visit based on their fees to date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can pay the Council direct for their £2100 but you must ensure they then confirm you owe £0, don't forget if paying by cheque or card the banking time it takes to clear. Also ensure you print off a receipt.

 

You can send the Bailiff a cheque for his levy charge only as that is all you are due to pay. As you have discharged your Liability in full as confirmed by the Council he cannot make any further enforcement for his fees alone but must instead take you to the Small Claims Court - very few do as they have to swear their fees were correct initially. The Bailiff should know he cannot charge a levy fee & enforcement/van fee at the same time.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st Visit £24.50

2nd Visit £18.00

Sum recovered up to £100 - £15.00

£100 to £400 - 4%

£400 to £1500 - 2.5%

£1500 to £8000 - 1%

£8000 and above Quarter of - 1%

 

 

It may help if fork it used present fees

 

2.- (1) In head B of the Table to paragraph 1, "the relevant amount" with respect to a levy means;-

(a) where the sum due at the time of the levy does not exceed £100, £24.50;

(b) where the sum due at the time of the levy exceeds £100, 24.5% on the first £100 of the sum due,

4% on the next £400, 2.5% on the next £1,500, 1% on the next £8,000 and 0.25% on any additional sum;

and the sum due at any time for these purposes means so much of the amount in respect of which the

liability order concerned was made as is outstanding at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great. Thank you for swift reply. I will go ahead and pay the council £2100 online (receipt is emailed) and phone them tomorrow for a confirmation of no outstanding liability. I will post a cheque to baliffs, guaranteed next day, for the Levy Charge of £82. I guess i should mention why i am not sending payment for the £200 "other costs". Any ideas how i should word my letter to the baliffs when i send them a cheque. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought...The baliff said that he turned up in a van to take stock. He also said he had just visited someone else. I have no way of knowing as i am in the centre of a town. Infact, he wouldnt have legally been able to load and unload at the time he came, due to restrictions.:-). Couldnt he say that he has the costs of the van(even though im sure he hasnt). He acted as though he was being generous to me as he believed i was being honest with him, by letting me pay by the end of the month. thnx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought...The bailiff said that he turned up in a van to take stock. He also said he had just visited someone else. I have no way of knowing as i am in the centre of a town. Infarct, he wouldn't have legally been able to load and unload at the time he came, due to restrictions.:-). Couldn't he say that he has the costs of the van(even though I'm sure he hasn't). He acted as though he was being generous to me as he believed i was being honest with him, by letting me pay by the end of the month. thnx.

 

 

the bailiff is not there to remove goods on a first visit he is there to levy goods against your debt (hence the reason he cant charge a van/attendance fee) therefore it doesn't matter if he went to 50 addresses

 

you must put in your letter that you have satisfied the liability order direct to the council and you have enclosed a cheque for the levy fee of £xx this being the only fee that the bailiff can charge at this stage of enforcement according to The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 (amended) Regulation 45 Schedule 5 charges connected with distress and you now consider the account closed inform them to confirm in writing that the account is closed or provide an explanation for the charge listed as other on the notice of seizure and why they believe you are liable to pay this fee

send a copy to your council also

Link to post
Share on other sites

He can attend with a 44 ton articulated lorry if he wants but he may only charge fees in accordance with THE COUNCIL TAX (ADMINISTRATION & ENFORCEMENT) REGULATIONS 1992 as amended. Doesn't matter if he's been to someone else or not & strangely enough there can be a dispensation from the Council for him to break any loading restrictions. Yes he has visited you just the once and he is there to levy distress on your goods, however he cannot at that same time charge you a 1st Visit Fee (as he levied distress), he may have made a levy (very remiss of me but I should have asked on what - can you do this now?). For some strange reason he has not asked you to sign a Walking Possession Agreement whereby he could have charged another £12.

 

Schedule 5 of the Regulations says that a levy must take place before an attendance fee may be charged - that is correct in your case. Case law in Culligan v Simkin & Marstons Group (2008) where the Judge analysed the process of making the levy concluded that there must be a gap between the two procedures and stated "to give the debtor a reasonable opportunity to pay what is due at the time of seizure".

 

Although the above was made in connection with road traffic enforcement it is reasonable also in Council Tax/NNDR cases. Incidentally did the Bailiff leave you a Notice of Seizure?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were 2 pieces of paper. 1 is headed NOTICE OF DISTRESS where he has written some of my goods/walking possession and the fees that i have mentioned. The other piece of paper is headed BALIFF REMOVAL, magistrates liability order/ distress warrant.( in BIG LETTERS) That says payment in full - 24 hours. Giving me the baliffs name and a mobile number. I cant believe someone with the power to take away goods can be so dishonest with their charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were 2 pieces of paper. 1 is headed NOTICE OF DISTRESS where he has written some of my goods/walking possession and the fees that i have mentioned.

 

Can you list what Items he has listed or has he written something like "all goods to satisfy the debt"

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for the record.

 

They are normaly much harsher when collecting business rates, and i believe they can remove goods on the first visit if the debtor refuses payment or WPO / payment plan.

 

I would like to be proved wrong, then i can get my local authority to change their published bailiff policy which states that 50% of the NDR arrears must be paid or goods removed on first visit.

 

This has no bearing on the op's situation. i.e. they cannot charge the visit / levy / van 'combo' in one visit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Inventory states.... Large qty of stock inc bedding etc. casio till. 2 tables. all goods belonging to (me) unless exempt by statue. The baliff didnt believe their was enough stock to satisfy the debt. I sell gifts and homewares, so lots of small items. He didnt even fill out the reverse of the form. Its a bit of a rush job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Baliffs will get cheque on Wednesday with letter that im about to draft, thanks to all your help. It does say on their form..."cheques accepted at our discretion". If they receive it on 23rd Feb (given that he gave me till end of month) it may not be cleared by that time. Could this be a problem? Can they use the fact that the Levy payment of £82 has not cleared.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Global levy? dont know what that is.:-(.

 

It's where a bailiff attempts to sieze all goods on the premises without listing them all, as in enters building lists things in one room only and also puts something like "all other property belonging to XXX " or all other assets on the premises" This is not allowed as in a domestic situation there are things he cannot take.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...