Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
    • I believe it to be, yes. no payment or acknowledgement of any debt to them since Feb 2018
    • Original credit agreement for them to prove the debt. Post 2 is the pro rota, I did this to the Original creditors sometime ago with offers of payment i got no reply, soon after the dca started sending me letters and phone calls. Thanks 
    • and another low spot for investment in Brexit UK (I dont give a monkeys about the bank) Coutts prepares to de-bank Britain At an event this week the bank’s chief investment officer Fahad Kamal said: “Currently, about 20 per cent of a standard balanced portfolio here is UK stocks, which is something of an anachronism. “It would be closer to three per cent or four per cent if it were more commensurate with the proportion of UK stocks in global stock markets. So this is a recalibration. The 332-year-old lender, which has King Charles as a client and, until recently, former UKIP leader Nigel Farage, will transfer £2 billion from British funds into overseas investments, reinforcing the “inexorable trend of outflows from the UK”, Charles Hall of investment bank Peel Hunt said. Coutts prepares to de-bank Britain WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM "This is a large transfer of assets from the UK to global funds, which reinforces the inexorable trend of outflows from the UK."  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Water damage claim with AXA, they are being awkward!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Makes sense what you're saying bernie129 and I do sympathise a lot. I used to work as a contractor and went back to perm due to the hassle involved in negotiating contracts.

 

In my situation, the claims management company tried to foist a cowboy builder on me, who I rejected so then they said my only solution was to get a cash settlement from the insurance company and find my own builder. Now submitted 3 quotes to the insurance company and have given a host of reasons why I think the cheapest of the 3 quotes is not a fair and reasonable settlement. Awaiting the claim's handler's response so that we can open negotiations.

 

I didn't find it that hard to find builder's willing to quote in the end but I live in London so the place is awash with builders. I got my quotes from checkatrade.com, mainly because they show whether a company is limited or not, whether they're VAT registered, what accredited schemes they're members of (with hyperlinks), what insurance they hold and where they're located and have worked. I ignore the ratings, the reviews or photos as these are unverifiable.

 

There are other websites such as mybuilder.com if you want a cheap job done with no chance of recovering your money if things go badly wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks everyone for all their help, just wanted to come back to give a quick update.

 

The Crawford & Co adjuster came around on Friday. Bit of a flying visit to be honest, and the conclusion he reached was he needed to pass it on to a local office, as it was above his £25k delegated authority. So it's now over 11 weeks and AXA haven't got me a settlement figure or agreed a start date for their builder...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi edb49 sounds like they are still giving you the runaround and you have my sympathies.

 

As I said before it only works one way with them, ask them if next time you pay your premium if its ok if you pay it 11 weeks after its due and see what they say.

 

How long does it take to price this work - to give you an idea I used to price stuff like this all the time and id measure on a monday and the customer would have the estimate within 7 days.

 

Interesting case though - 11 weeks and not a start on the job ,keep us informed as to how you go on though as it gives other people an idea as to who its best to take out insurance with.This story could run and run,good luck and I hope they start your work soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

]Water Damage claim December 2010: re-build of the interior of my home

 

I have had terrible problems with Davies Loss Adjusters, Cardiff. My insurance is with Zurich via Saga (as Brokers).

 

After constant delay tactics to deliberately wear me down I have been cornered into a process of a 'cash settlement'. I have a detailed extensive builders estimate, which I submitted on the understanding that I would have my own builder to carry out the work instead of their chosen contractors. I was designated as 'the employer' if I'd agreed to have their contractors (which seemed very odd to me - apart from the fact that the experience I'd had of both Davies and their contractors was dreadful). A Works Schedule has been drawn up by their in-house surveyor, which contained some costings, but items of work to be carried out were left off the schedule. The surveyor mysteriously disappeared from the negotiations of my claim and this caused considerable delay to my claim.

 

I now find myself in a position of negotiating a 'cash settlement' after having been told by the Loss Adjuster that getting my own contractors in was a 'cash settlement' (yes... I have been Naive... if only we could do a crash course in insurance claims before we go into this whole cut-throat process - but we're usually in a state of complete despair and panic from the incident of the reason for the claim - hindsight is a wonderful thing).

 

I have been continually bated by them thorough the setting up of a tender process - yes, two of their builders did come out to look at my property in order to put in a tender. They had the Works Schedule to work from )minus the costings) and the idea was that one of them would be nominated - win the tender - and be employed by Me... to carry out the extensive repairs to restore my property. I, eventually, after much more delay tactics, received a garbled phone call from the surveyor (the last I ever heard from him) to set-up a date for a Site Meeting - where 'everything would be sorted out'....

 

The date of the meeting came and went and nothing happened. I had no explanation as to why the surveyor left the scene of my claim... and I then in desperation told the Loss Adjuster that I would 'project manage the whole thing myself and get my own builders in'. Apparently, this is were the confusion lies. But at no time, until very recently, has the Loss Adjuster made clear to me the distinction between on the one hand getting my own contractors in to replace the insurers contractors and getting a 'Cash Settlement'.

 

I now believe there never was going to be a 'site Meeting' and that the process was mainly to wear me down and trap me into going for a cash settlement.

 

I put in a very extensive builder's estimate - which came to £54,000.00 including VAT and a contingency sum of £3,500.00. Given that the surveyor didn't go into the attic, I'm unsure as to the full extent of the water damage up in the attic in the way of wooden beams and such like and also such a big build needs a contingency fee.

 

The Loss Adjuster has told me that 'they don't cover VAT - so I can knock off £8,000.00 or a contingency fee and he is 'looking at the costings'. The costings are all very fair and above board and compiled by a local builder of excellent reputation.

 

Does anyone know if it is true that the Insurers 'do not cover costings for Vat or a contingency fee'....

 

I would be grateful for any comments on this.

 

Agnettio

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask the loss adjuster as I don't really understand what they have said. It could be something to do with the value of the works.

 

Being that this is a domestic claim and not commercial, I would have thought that they would pay all the relevant costs including VAT.

 

Please set up your own thread, as otherwise the OP and others who contributed to this thread, will get email updates and posts that are not relevant to the OP.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi edb49, how is your claim going. I'd be interested to know. I have put a description of the problems I'm having on this thread. I am now, apparently, locked in a cash settlement conversation with the loss adjuster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria67,

 

I'm new to this site and really don't know how to set up a new thread. But I'm grateful for your comments.

 

All you need to do is go to the overall topic thread i.e. Insurance/Assurance. On the particular page, there is a button POST NEW THREAD.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?62-Insurance-Assurance-Companies-Pensions

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quickly about VAT. The situation with cash settlements is the insurer does not need to pay the VAT component until you have been presented with a VAT invoice. (Because you haven't "lost" that money until you have been invoiced.) So what you should agree with the insurer is either to pay you the VAT up front, or else they will pay you the VAT on your contractor's invoice with 7 days of you presenting the invoice to the insurer.

 

My claim is going OK. In fact, I think it will get resolved today. The thing that ultimately got the claim moving forwards was me taking legal action against AXA. This got their solicitors involved, and I had to keep on ratcheting up the pressure with their solicitors to get an outcome that was fair. We've agreed on a settlement figure now, and they sent through the documentation yesterday when I was out all day. I'm going to check it through today and hopefully sign it off. The financial settlement we've agreed is just under 9 times higher than they first offered!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Water Damage end of December 2010. I have a water damage claim in excess of 50,000 and have had all of the above problems with Davies Loss Adjusters. The insurance preferred builders that came out to initially do a stabilising process were shambolic. The loss adjuster and his surveyor deliberately delayed my claim in order to wear me down over a period of time. They have used tactics to bewilder, confuse and deceive me and they have lied to me. I eventually contacted Saga (my broker) and they seem to have had some clout with the insurer, Zurich. I've submitted my own builder's estimate and Zurich have given me a different loss adjuster (Cunningham Lindsey) to deal with the restoration of my home (using my own builder). The new loss adjuster is very much of the same ilk as Davies (Cagey and with a stance of solidarity with the previous loss adjuster), but the surveyor seems much better and a decent sort of person. Now a proper schedule of works is being set-up and he wants a statement of method from my builder. It's looking much better - but will my builder still be available to carry out the work when it all finally gets rubber stamped for the go ahead...? That's my problem now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Sorry to hear you are having such a lot of problems. I found the whole insurance side of things much more stressful than the fact that my home was uninhabitable - although at first I thought the damage to my home was the worst that could happen. But in fact, thanks to the insurance company, things got much worse. Eventually.... I managed to get it sorted out. But it took a YEAR before I was back in my own home and by that time I was shattered and had become quite ill.

 

I can't imagine what advice to give you as it was so convoluted. What I did find incredibly helpful was joining Which? magazine's legal advice. You can email them with a list of problems that you are experiencing. You have to give them a brief outline of the problem and then you can keep going back to them for more advice as you go along.

 

This forum was also incredibly helpful - they will give you advice and guidance and moral support. The best part of this CAG is linking-up with others who are experiencing similar problems.

 

I don't know your situation, but you are entitled to go to your own surveyor and also to have contractors of your own choice - local contractors make much more sense and you can check out their reputation before taking them on. If you are not happy with the insurance company you need legal advice - and that's what I sought at Which? Magazine. It was the cheapest option, but quite hard work as you have to be economical with your question. But they are very good!

 

Good luck

 

agnettio

Link to post
Share on other sites

It most certainly WAS Davies Loss Adjusters Cardiff... but I'm concerned about personal contact as I've no way of telling if you're genuine. Don't want to sound paranoid... but I have to be careful.

 

One thing is for sure, if they are the people you are dealing with, then you have to get rid of them! You can request a different loss adjuster. Just tell your insurance company that you're not happy with them - quote their reputation on this site and refuse to deal with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that i am 10000% genuine as these people are trying to destroy my life

 

i am new to this site and not the best with IT at the best of times, how could i contact you/you contact me etc are we allowed to exchange numbers etc on this site I dont know the answer to that one

 

i would be able to re assure you if we were to speak , but i fully understand your concerns

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have a word with Richard, who I met on this site, and see if we can get in touch. It'll take a little time as I need to contact him and then work something out.

 

Give me a week or so. Will be back in touch.

 

Meanwhile get in touch with your insurance company and tell them you want a different loss adjuster as Davies are putting up barriers to resolving your claim. Don't settle for anything other than a different loss adjuster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there richard withey has sent me a friend request and i have accepted not sure if im using the site properly, and im awaiting a response

 

my case has gone past that stage and the insurers are as bad if not worse

 

the thing is that i am up against a timesclale at present

 

are we allowed to exchange details etc as i am happy to let you contact me if you so wish i am genuine and wish i could somehow convince you etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that i am 10000% genuine as these people are trying to destroy my life

 

i am new to this site and not the best with IT at the best of times, how could i contact you/you contact me etc are we allowed to exchange numbers etc on this site I dont know the answer to that one

 

i would be able to re assure you if we were to speak , but i fully understand your concerns

 

Hello again.

 

Advice against personal contact is done for your own protection, as Agnettio says, you have no way of knowing who someone is on the interweb.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, You need to post 15 times to send private emails, do this, and your welcome to send me your number. Agnettio has said your in trouble with a claim. Please just be advised I am limited with what I can say online and can't discuss my claim at present. But if someone needs help and there is no regulator for Loss Adjusting Companies to go to, then basic discussion here should be fine. What was your claim for and what Loss Adjusting Company are you with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi to All interested claimants,

 

A rather belated update on my problems with Davies Group in relation to their handling of my insurance claim.

 

In mid December 2011 I finally moved back into my home. The whole process had taken a full twelve months.

 

After having refused to have anything more to do with Davies Loss Adjusters (Cardiff), my claim went from strength to strength. The local builders that I myself appointed were overseen by a very good surveyor from Cunningham Lindsey Loss Adjusters - although the actual Loss Adjuster from Cunningham Lindsey was of a similar mindset to the Davies Group of Loss Adjusters. However, I was fortunate to be given a decent and honest surveyor whom I felt (in the main) I could trust.

 

The work by my own appointed builders was excellent and I am now enjoying my home very much.

 

Some time after I moved back into my home, I submitted a complaint to my insurer, Zurich, and have since received a heartfelt (or so they say) apology and have given me a courtesy payment of £500 by way of apology. I've accepted this and feel glad to finally draw a line under the whole dreadful experience.

 

It was so hard to take on both Davies Loss Adjusters and, in part, Zurich Insurance. However, I was in a stronger position to fight my case than most because Saga were my brokers and they did, where possible, fight my corner for me. Although, Saga, it has to be said, appoint insurance companies with disreputable loss adjusters - undoubtedly... Saga are only too aware of the problems that are so endemic within the insurance and loss adjusting industries.

 

This website, The Consumer Action Group, was an invaluable source of information and moral support to me. Without CAG I would not have met Richard Withey. And without Richard Withey I would not have had the moral support and shared knowledge to take on Davies Loss Adjusters in the way that I did.

 

Thank you Consumer Action Group and thank you Richard Withey.

 

Agnettio

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Feb 2013

 

New to this forum - has anyone had any recent dealings with Davies Loss Adjusters (Manchester) have added to this existing forum hoping to find a bit of advice.

 

Having a bit of trouble i think in the process of a claim but as its our first ever we dont know if this is standard practice ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...