Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4848 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Long story short - lost business about a year and a half ago and as result lost house, car etc.. My self and my partner moved to the family farm. There is a small granny annex built on and thats where we live. We pay rent etc to my father.

As a result of all the business losses I have a number of large debts (£200k +) and unfortunatley I have given personal guarantees with some of them. At the moment I cannot afford to go Bankrupt although a creditor has tried but the judge refused it because of the circumstances etc...

The basics are I have nothing. I am trying to get back on my feet and have started an outside catering business, with the financial help of my sister, but this is slow - very slow! We are basically living off one wage. All household bills are being met by my partner without a problem but I am now starting to get worries in case bailiffs are employeed by some of these creditors. The house we are in as Ive said is owned by my father and was partially furnished when we moved in. My sister lives in Scotland and when she moved there she left a lot of her furniture with us, which we are using. The house previoulsy had my fathers wifes parents living there but they have gone into residential care and we again have a lot of the furniture etc... So there is very little in the house that is mine personally and also very little of any major value. To emphasise this when my big tv broke we borrowed a small 20 inch from my partners colleague. We are basically renting a fully furnished house!

Whilst it has not got to bailiff stage yet, if it does, how can I stop them taking stuff that is not mine and can they take any of the equipment that my sister bought for me to help me start up in a small business etc...

Any basic help / guidelines / info would be most appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difficult part is the ifs and buts. The chances of a Bailiff visiting will depend on how many of your creditors take this to Court, they will have to get Court Orders first. In theory you should receive notification of any Court action first but because you have moved some will obtain Judgment by Default - ie finding against you - because everything has been sent to your old address and as no answers are forthcoming the Court has no option but to award Judgment to the Creditor. The first you sometimes know of this is when the Bailiff comes knocking and you can apply to have the Order set aside. I would imagine considering the sums involved it will be a High Court Enforcement Officer who will attend and they are a different kettle of fish to the Bailiff.

 

If the Bailiff does turn up then whatever the circumstances do NOT allow him entry. Before any action takes place you can sell or otherwise dispose of any of your possessions. If you are effectively renting a furnished house then have a simple agreement drawn up and rent book which show this, have an inventory of the goods drawn up which belongs to the Landlord. As for your sisters effects she should draw up a Statutory Declaration of the items which are hers, cost of this is £5/£10 at any Solicitor or Commissioner for Oaths.

 

Hope this helps.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that - very helpful.

Can I ask, once they find the new address (thats if they are looking) would they just re start with the letters or could they just arrive at the door?? And if they do just arrive how do I legally ask for all the detilas etc. and request for it to be set aside.

In honesty most of the debts are individually small and under 10k. Its the RBS that have the bulk - following sale of house theres a shortfall of £50k but they did not get a judgement on that without leave of court, a personal loan of about £30k which Ive not heard anything about and the business overdraft of approx £7k whcih is the one RSM Tenon are on with. RBS know my current address, they found me ages ago so I would have thought the rest would have too but not heard anything to date!!

Theres quite a few that I know will not be chased from personal conversations with people etc..

Its like you say its a waiting game and Im just trying to be as best prepared for when it or IF anything nasty happens etc...

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a Bailiff turns up he will have a Warrant of Execution issued by the Court. These are mostly Court appointed Bailiffs and are fairly amenable, after all they get a salary and do not rely on results for payment. If the HCEO turns up he will have a Writ of Fi Fa issued through the High Court, he is a different beast, charges are astronomical and very tenacious. However in both cases if they have just turned up they can be dealt with by applying back at Court for:

a - suspension of the Warrant for the County Court Bailiff

b - a Stay of Execution for the HCEO - usually pending determination of another application which will more than likely be a Set Aside.

 

If you follow what was said previously you will have no possessions and providing you deny them entry - I assume your father knows your predicament - so you you should tell him to the same if anyone turns up. You can get prior knowledge if they have gone down the CCJ route by checking your Credit File on a regular basis as any Judgments granted will show on these pdq. Until you know what they have done or been granted it is difficult to expand much further.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...