Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax / walking possession order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4862 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A bailiff turned up I ignore the door bell unless i'm expecting someone. (I'm disabled and people call me first before calling round or they have a key). I had no idea who it was anyway.

 

Then a letter was pushed through the door which turn out to be a walking possession order. The bailiff went and looked over the back garden fence and list anything he could see.

 

Sure this cant be legal?

 

Can a balif list thing in your garden fornt or back (I have an 8ft sold fence around the back coz of the dog / the front is open drive way) without gaining entry to the property first?

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHow much is the order for? and do you receive benefits, like Incapacity, or ESA and DLA, ?, and as you are disabled you are likely vulnerable under the guidelines for enforcement. If you are on inciome based bensfits you should be in receipt of some Council Tax benefit/ Housing benefit if you rent

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax

 

The disabled bit aside

 

Can a bailif list things in your garden fornt or back without gaining entry to the property first?

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

They probably could list them, but there would have to be sufficient value in the goods to pay his fees, the removal, auction fees and a proportion of the debt. They like to levy on cars if they can also. if you check the stickys there is a fair bit on there

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if its screwed to to the wall their not allowed to remove it as its a fixture or fitting,a walk in posession order is just that a householder either leaves a window open they can climb in or fall for some dubious story and let them walk in and sign such a document.hence keep them outside and they have to return the warrant unsatisfied.and never sign anything or let them in.

 

most people dont have anything of real value in their gardens anyway.so its doubtful if it will include the stone bird bath and table/feeder exe.

 

the problem with council tax if the debt goes above £750 they may attempt to bankrupt you,are you sure your not entitled to any council tax benefit relief and claiming all that you should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get IS, IB, DLA and my car is taxed as disabled so they cant touch that and its parked on my driveway which is mt front garden. So to touch it they would have to trespass.

 

This is for an old property (over 10 years ago). I think its for about £200 or £300 is owed.

 

The goods lists are garden orniments not woth anything. I've not signed anything either.... the document says they canenter my house to sezie the goods

 

I get full council tax now maybe thats how they found me?

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get IS, IB, DLA and my car is taxed as disabled so they cant touch that and its parked on my driveway which is mt front garden. So to touch it they would have to trespass.

 

This is for an old property (over 10 years ago). I think its for about £200 or £300 is owed.

 

The goods lists are garden orniments not woth anything. I've not signed anything either.... the document says they canenter my house to sezie the goods

 

I get full council tax now maybe thats how they found me?

 

You are most likely classed as vulnerable, and being in receipt of benefits, bailiff action may well be inappropriate. contact the council and tell them this as deduction from benefit is the preferred option, adding bailiff fees to someone on benefits is an obnoxious proceedure. I would check with the council when and for what address the Liability Order was obtained.

 

Others will likely be along who know more.

Edited by brassnecked
grammar

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to contact the council as above.they cannot just break in its not a court fine or should they "just stuff" a walk in possession order through the door letterbox they must have had prior access to do so and then would to avoid any later redress would seek a signature, and such a move would be nothing more then intimidatory,given a disabled person and in this situation is unacceptable behavior.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to remind the Council of your status, if you are in receipt of CTB then they already know your circumstances and should never have put this out to the Bailiff in the first place. Send an email off tonight to CEO of the Council and copy in Head of Revenues, for good measure make sure your local Councillor and Leader of the Council are notified also.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

morsy I agree with ploddertom, get onto the council by email as suggested ASAP if you don't know who your councillor is, try here http://www.writetothem.com/ where you can find your councillor and MP contact details.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise .... I belive they have also applied £30 fee for the visit

 

My concern is if they come back and try to gain entry and call the police and they let them in think they have a vaild walking possesion order, or is this an intimidation taktic?

 

Most peopple will have things out in the garden i.e. table chairs, bird feeder, orniments etc peering over the fence or threw a crack and listing what you can see surly must be ilegal? Suprised they did not list the dog, but hey hes a rescue so he not my sole property plus he'd eat them!

 

I know they can climb over the fence into your garden to enter the building if a window is open. Mine all have locks on them so I can lock them shut or open slighly for ventilation so they cant get in.

 

I'll see what the council have to say on this one tomorrow

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise .... I belive they have also applied £30 fee for the visit

 

My concern is if they come back and try to gain entry and call the police and they let them in think they have a vaild walking possesion order, or is this an intimidation taktic?

 

They have so far not gained peaceful entry to your home so any threat of forced entry is just that - they cannot do it. They want you to sign the WPA in order that they can charge an extra fee - £12-00.

 

Most peopple will have things out in the garden i.e. table chairs, bird feeder, orniments etc peering over the fence or threw a crack and listing what you can see surly must be ilegal? Suprised they did not list the dog, but hey hes a rescue so he not my sole property plus he'd eat them! This may be something of a grey area and I would argue his levy is invalid as he he has not gained access to seize them, he is allowed to climb your fence providing he causes no damage and if there are clear signs there is a dog on the premises then that is his look out - after all how are you supposed to know he was coming!

 

I know they can climb over the fence into your garden to enter the building if a window is open. Mine all have locks on them so I can lock them shut or open slighly for ventilation so they cant get in.

 

I'll see what the council have to say on this one tomorrow

The Council will be argumentative and refuse to take it back, this is what those at the bottom are told to do, you need to be further up the food chain and don't take no for an answer.

 

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

make sure you email the CEO and councillor, as well If they have an outsoursced front desk, you could be in a Capita/Equita type scenario so will have to push this upstairs. Whixh council ios it?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to seizure of goods the normal rule is the bailiff has to be able to touch it. So looking over the fence would be deemed satisfactory,however this levy does not give him the right of entry as you have been advised he has not made peaceful entry so he cannot force entry and the police would only attend to prevent a breach of the peace. Goods screwed down can be removed it is common practice to remove wall mounted televisions. Goods deemed to be fittings are kitchen cabinets, doors, fireplaces,windows etc ....

 

It is highly unlikely that he council will bankrupt you as there has been a change in policy since the new goverment came in and obviously it would cost the council and they probably have bigger fish to bankrupt.If you vehicle is motability or on finance they cannot seize it.

 

The other point to note is that the guidelines state that just because somebody may be classed as vunerable it doesnt mean they are suffering hardship but clamping a vehicle belonging to a disabled person should be avoided.

 

What you should consider doing is contacting the council direct and ask them to do an attatchment to your ESA it will be deducted at source at a low amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK contacted the council they referd me to the Bailifs but I asked to speak to a supervisor or Manger as the Bailifs can't answer these questions and they refered me to the council. I've not phoned the bailifs but yet I got the answers I think I need.

 

Ok its for the last property I lived in, which I paid in full in feb 1999. The period they charged was for end July 98 when I moved in to March 99 however I had a 6 months tenancy and was given notice to terminate (Nov 98 ) at the end of the 6 months as the owner wanted to sell, I move out begining of Jan 99 and the property remained empty till sold. The council obtained a liability order for the whole period 7/98 to 3/99 and sent all the paper work to the old address. The payment I made in Feb was via telephone banking BACS payment in Feb 99 the council recived this but said it was return 4 days later they have no idea they say its a Direct Debit paymrnt (I never use DD). I contacted my bank they dont hold record back that far and say a BACS payment once left can not be recalled. so were did this money go?

 

The fact that the amount they say I owe was for a longer period then I lived there, the council say if I can prove when I moved out they will adjust the amont owed. Howerver as they recived my payment I've over paid them any way. Is the liability order vaild as it for the wrong amont owed / period?

 

I can see this one getting interesting!

 

On the note of the Bailifs thing I expained about the WPO and the alleged levy on goods in the garden, the council say its vaild and the Bailifs can come back and take them. I pointed out the value of the goods listed at new was only £60 and now the wooden table n chairs are rotten and worth nothing they not likly to get £30 for all the item listed which is what they have charged me. Plus hte fact I have not signed anything and they have not entered the property.

 

She said she would check with colluages and the Bailifs firm, she just phone back saying it is vaild I asked by what satute / athority? The reply from the council manger - the Bailifs - made me chuckle any way. I said I dont quite think it works like that and I dispute the vailidity of the WPO. She said shes made notes

 

BTW I have truecall so it all recorded.

 

I willl dig out the evideance of the move and sent it to them. After that correction the council claims £98.99 plus £21.00 costs (119.99) that I owe ... put I've over paid them by £138.01 (feb 99 payment made, return by council, that I never recived that back).

 

They have also taken an overpayment from my current property £16.23 to pay of the money owed. Leaving 103.76 to pay

 

They want £5 a month form Jan 2011 to clear the £103.76 they say is owe based on my benifits (IS / IB)

 

If I agree to the payments they will take the account back from the Bailifs, what then happpens to the bailifs charges?

 

What should I do?

Edited by morsy

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have overcharged you for the previous addrfess and then gained a liability order , they may be on a sticky wicket, glad you have recorded the call as it may well be useful later, bailiffs seem to make it up as they go along with collusion from the council.

 

Others will be able to advise further

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

bump

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion you are on the right track but will need to dig up as much evidence as you can when you moved. This may be from the next property you moved into. I assume when you did move you notified the Council. As for the payment that has gone missing it will not be the first time this has been allocated to another department within a Council, they should investigate this.

 

The Council are obviously talking out of their derrieres re the levy. If it was not for the fact it was so serious I would ring them up and tell them you are aggrieved by the Bailiffs levy and will be making a Regulation 46 Complaint at the Magistrates Court naming the Council as Defendant. This should make them sit up and take note.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind they have offered to take the account back i would accept this and start paying the fiver it will stop the bailiffs attending, just ask the council if they will be quashing the bailiff fees and ask for it in writing. At least this will buy you some time whilst you olan your next step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help / advice.

 

I've agreed to pay £5 a month so they have taken the account back.

I have asked the council to investigate where my payment has gone to, they say they returned the money back to the account it came from, but I would notice an exta £230+ in my account. Lets see what their investigation show up.

 

Anything I can do about the liability order as its for the wrong amount, its for more than I owe and for a period longer than I was resident there.

 

I have faxed the council the letter giving me notice to quit the tenancy which I recieved from the agency. Plus details from my new property that I moved in to. The council have accepted this and are amending the account.

 

The agency I rented from should have informed then and I also sent letters out at the time (untilites phone etc) asi didn't trust the agenct.

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were not liable for the time they claim they must also abolish any & all charges associated with this ie the costs of the Liability Order.

 

PT

 

So does that mean if they charge me for 10 momths and I lived there for 6 months in the same tax year and owe some of the 6 months council tax they must abolish any & all charges associated with this ie the costs of the Liability Order?

 

Because they are insisting I pay their costs for the Liability Order?

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry may not have made myself clear. If they had a LO solely for the time you had moved out then there would be no charges they could apply. However if that time covered partly the time you lived there then yes you would be liable to pay it.

 

Example

Council obtained LO for Jan - March & you had moved in Dec then no charge payable.

Council obtained LO for Jan - March & you moved in Feb then yes you would pay the cost of obtaining the LO but outstanding CT would only be for the time you were resident.

 

Hope that sorts it.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the clarity .... so I need a copy of the libaility order too see whats on it

Edited by morsy

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...