Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I thought the LibDems were going to table a motion of no confidence? I haven't heard anything about it for a couple of days.
    • Sorry for late reply dx been away and appreciate your replies. Yes he has paid the original borrowed amount off but obviously interest on top in which is owed and offer to write off. I know it is only a small amount owing but I didn't know whether to attempt to pursue with reclaim of previous paid amount plus interest. Or just to accept their offer and have removed from Credit File.
    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft chasing Lloyds loan now sold to 1st credit


intend
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 395
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Update on loan account - now received letter from Apex Credit Management Ltd. "Acting for their client" and "role is to act as an intermediary between you and our client to ensure that the debt is repaid"

 

Cant be bothered to scan as usual drivel as "we profile our clients' accounts carefully.." blah blah blah.

 

Account has been in dispute with Moorcrap after CCA request came back empty.

 

Advice on my response gratefully received.

 

Thankfully my daughter has now realised this is just another 2 bob ride on the DCA merry-go-round. Me, I'm just annoyed LTSB did not have the balls to write to us.

 

Would love to come to some permamant arrangement with LTSB so she and her family can have some certainty in their lives.

 

Cheers intend

 

Bumping -

 

note to Abrig - shouldn't it be Thebrig??? -

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sat here thinking the CC debt has been handled with courtesy by LTSB and son-in-law paying regular amount, probably a bit more than he should but affordable, but fair play to LTSB they have frozen interest and refunded a fair wack - so to me thats fine.

 

But the loan "sharks" have been praying for blood and refuse to enter into reasonable discussions - were paying over £50 per month - not really affordable but Intend helped out, then in middle of 12 month agreement, they passed it to Moorcroft, who demamded more. With advice of this site, CCA'd them - can't find agreement, Mcrap but account on hold and I stop paying. LTSB refuse to communicate directly - so carry on not paying.

 

Now the letter from Apex.

 

Should I send letter that Account in Dispute"?? Sure BB would say complain cos think they should not pass to another when in dispute.

 

But moral of story to our Bank - "play fair and I will pay"

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

If moorcr@p have it then it is either unenforceable due to the lack of paperwork, or it is full of charges ect, and it will never see the inside of a court.

 

All moorcr@p require is this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency

Edit to suit, send it 2nd class post but obtain "Proof of posting" from the PO counter. And ignore them.

 

If your paying them anything for this then stop, no-one gets another penny until they furnish you with the agreement and proof that they can actually legally receive money from you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been to busy to do anything other than ignore Apex - but now they are ringing - must ring em today before 5pm - yeah right.

 

Time to write and tell them they have got a pup???

 

Intend

 

Just despatched letter to Apex stating do not recognise the debt owed as quoting some reference number rather that an account number and theat I do not respond to unsolicited demands for money from organisations I have had no dealing with. Also said in writing only. 2nd class post with proof of posting.

 

I know I should have sent letter in dispute letter but want to string it out a little.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another letter from Apex - might have crossed with mine to them. Usual drivel - disappointed failed to reach any agreement with us. Funny I have agreed to not pay them - presume they have disagreed - should I be disappointed?? Account to be passed to their internal litigation team in order to consider the best course of action for recovery odf the debt outstanding - easy pass it back to LTSB and I will deal with it but will not pay DCAs

 

Time for account in dispute letter as advised above.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is this posting here posing as the Brig??. Be aware of imposters!!

 

Seriously nice to see your old self back.

 

Letters about to be printed and sent off. On CC front - got another default notice - will ignore still paying the £20 per month. If only LTSB would talk about the loan I would arrange some payments despite no CCA.

 

Daughter just been made redunant - so back to drawing board - need to sit down and run over the finances again - prpare for more fun and games, she hasn't much debt but makes paying LTSb more difficult. But as BB says - priorites first which for her is two kids.

 

Thanks to this site I can stay on top of situation and keep the stress from her - like me she worries when not in full control.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's sad news Intend, but there are jobs out

there my 18 year old granddaughter who has an

8 week old baby has just achieved a modern apprenticeship

doing an NVQ as an adminitrator in one of the largest

estate agents head office.

As Boo says priorities are family and health and well being.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Brig - good on your grandaughter. My daughter is not one to sit back, like me, her and her hubby have the work ethic and their reward is to be part of the working poor, trapped in a life where every penny counts. I do my best to insulate her from the worries.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Couple of letters from LTSB - one a statement of account for last year - with a closing balance - would indicate they have not sold it and one stating whole balance is in arrears.

 

What is the significance of whole balance being in arrears??

 

Apex been quite since informed them account was already in dispute.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Intend I would think that the whole balance

has been called in for immediate repayment and

if it has not been paid in full then it is in arrears.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just getting a little concerned reading the current thread on site about "CAG running scared of CCA" as I have stopped payments due to no CCA. Seems to be a difference of opinion.

 

For moment my call is to carry on none payment until something concrete happens

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Intend,

Please believe CAG and the subscribers to it is

not running scared of anything,there have been

changes due to case law, one can no longer

rely on faulty or missing paperwork to indicate

possibly unenforceability, continue always to

challenge documents if the is a reasonable chance

of success, but to rely on the non production of

a CCA will now not necessarily keep the matter out

of court with recon documents if properly constucted

can be acceptable.

The DCA/creditor cannot enforce a debt in court

without an agreement, but they can still start action,

and pursue collection, they could at any time produce

a recon that MAYOR MAY NOT BE COMPLIANT,

here is where the balance of probabilities enters

the fray, a lot depends on the the back up evidence

to go with a recon.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...