Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dayglo's mission to get his life back!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4731 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest willowb

It's a mine field isn't it? Who would clean up their act? The ICO are useless and the FOS will do nothing......"errrrm about what exactly?":rolleyes: A big bundle of letters to MPs (as UniBoy has done about financial institutions right to process data etc) but this is an accusation that there is hidden data only available to lenders being placed on our file or at least that a credit score reflects events not documented in our files????? The situation will implode before it gets exposed.

 

Off topic (an eternally bewildered Willow:) )........The fact that a certain person has not posted since the end of September is unnerving me......I know that he said he had 'something up his sleeve' to do with the CRAs and maybe he's working on that and doesn't want to let anything slip here, but his continued absence is knocking my confidence.......anyone understand what the hell I'm going on about?

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Dayglo I have been going after the CRA for last two months now, so if you want any of my letters or see any of the crap they have been sending me let me know - funny that though as im typing a letter to experian as i type this.

 

they are full of contradictions and misquotes regarding ICO report andcant seem to grasp that when I point it out to them!!!!

 

If they quote can instead of may at me once more Im going to travel up to the Directors office myself and thump them!!!!

 

Anway like I said Im already pursueing that angle and can let you know what to expect.

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic (an eternally bewildered Willow:) )........The fact that a certain person has not posted since the end of September is unnerving me......I know that he said he had 'something up his sleeve' to do with the CRAs and maybe he's working on that and doesn't want to let anything slip here, but his continued absence is knocking my confidence.......anyone understand what the hell I'm going on about?

 

Wxx

 

I understand you clearly Willow.

 

I'm wondering too.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just forked out £17 to get my Equifax report and score online.

they work on a scale 0-500

my score came out at 350 which is 'poor'

325-375 poor

375-425 is fair

425-475 is good

475+ is excellent

 

I just did the same and I came out at 363 from 290 3 weeks ago before I had 2 defaults removed from British Gas

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Thanks Number6:) I guess it's because I've filed my claims now and reading his posts always spurred me on. I understand fully what his contentions are and I'm willing to 'face the music' if either of my cases go to Court but as for quoting law off the top of my head......no way!!!!:confused: I think that it's like studying for an important exam but without having a teacher there to guide, just a text book. Although Tinks et al are great, it was SB's origional thinking that started all this........I'm having a bad day I guess......just thinking too much:(

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well lets see what the judge has to say to me next week then eh!

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Number6:) I guess it's because I've filed my claims now and reading his posts always spurred me on. I understand fully what his contentions are and I'm willing to 'face the music' if either of my cases go to Court but as for quoting law off the top of my head......no way!!!!:confused: I think that it's like studying for an important exam but without having a teacher there to guide, just a text book. Although Tinks et al are great, it was SB's origional thinking that started all this........I'm having a bad day I guess......just thinking too much:(

 

Wxx

 

SB was certianly an inspiration and a driving force to me. His posts often took me a couple of hours to get my head around but always led me in the right direction.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok everyone - fairly bad news I'm afraid - I got this from my local court today

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

unless the claimant do by 4:00pm on the 29th November 2006 serve on the defendant and file at court a statement in writing settling out the legal basis upon which he asserts that the County Court has jurisdication to hear this matter, the power that he alleges the County Court has to strike out an entry on a credit file, and the precise legal nature of the remedy which he seeks, the claim shall be and is by this order struck out

 

 

 

I have no idea what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SB was certianly an inspiration and a driving force to me. His posts often took me a couple of hours to get my head around but always led me in the right direction.

 

Pete

 

Yes guys, I agree- I wonder where he is and although I am little more nervous without him, we have all learned enough from him to help each other through - I'm sure he will post when he's brought the CRA's down, lol!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok everyone - fairly bad news I'm afraid - I got this from my local court today

 

 

 

 

I have no idea what to do.

 

 

Whaaaaaaaaat???? Is this basically the Court saying that they do not have power to hear it or is this a request from Vodafone?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blody cheek of it!!!

 

The fact that the bank have registered a default agiinst you as a result of acting unlawful!!!!

 

Ok sorry Day - me just having gut reaction here, which is not helping you I know. Its not the same blooming judge as Jonni is it!!!!

 

OK I will give it a shot and have a look at some stuff - about to log off now but are you going to be around 11ish tomoro (however you may have a result by then so here hopeing hey).

 

I also have a vested interest in this due to my hearing next week, so I think we need to get our thinking caps on - have you contacted Jonnie by the way?

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems Vodas defence was to question the courts jurisdiction.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweet - well if we cant get an answer from the court then wher the hell are we suposed to go to get incorrect or disputed information removed?

 

I think this whole CRA subject is onethat needs to be looked at more closly - even as a seperate campaign.

 

Im wondering if UK cant help what we may have to look at with european law and data protection!

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems Vodas defence was to question the courts jurisdiction.

 

Yes, that's my take.

 

Thinking caps on time folks.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems Vodas defence was to question the courts jurisdiction.

 

but what is the point of a Court if it has no juristiction - who would have it? That's what I don't understand......so the court are asking Dayglo to prove that they do have juristiction?!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

How's this for starters:

 

The jurisdiction of the county courts is entirely statutory and covers almost the whole field of civil law.The general jurisdiction in civil law is mostly concurrent with that of the High Court, save that personal injury claims for less than £50,000 and money claims for less than £15,000 must be started in the county courts. Further detail is to be found in the High Court and County Courts Jurisdiction Order 1991 (as amended). A number of statutes confer exclusive jurisdiction on the county courts: for example, virtually all cases under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and most actions by mortgage lenders and landlords.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this, referring to the Data Protection Act:

 

Jurisdiction and procedure.

 

15. - (1) The jurisdiction conferred by sections 7 to 14 is exercisable by the High Court or a county court or, in Scotland, by the Court of Session or the sheriff.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely this would fall under section 10 of the Data Protection Act - remedies under this legislation are clearly under the jurisdiction of the County Court.

 

 

in laymans terms - I've served a notice under section 10 of the DPA.

 

Vodafone have refused to accept it citing ICO say they can process data based on Schedule 2 para. 6

 

Section 10 of the DPA only allows exceptions under paras. 1-4 not 6.

 

How do I turn this into something that meets the requirements of the notice from court today?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, for what its worth from the muppet factory at experian

 

"the onlyinstance we will remove information without direct authorisation from the data provider is if a court order is provided"

 

Sorry I couldnt cut and paste from the letter. Though I think what the brains above have posted superceeds my info - well done you guys!!

 

What it is with these judges and the whole thing with defaults etc etc!

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

in laymans terms - I've served a notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act.

 

Vodafone have refused to accept it citing Information Commissioners Office say they can process data based on Schedule 2 para. 6

 

Section 10 of the DPA only allows exceptions under paras. 1-4 not 6.

 

How do I turn this into something that meets the requirements of the notice from court today?

 

Bear with me, still working on it.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

You go pete!!!

 

We are baring!!!

Allyxia

KEEP FIGHTING FOR YOUR MONEY - EVEN WHEN IT GETS TOUGH

The Banks are somewhere which lends you an umberella when it is sunny, and takes it away when it rains

 

HSBC £1200 - Settled in Full

Cap 1 2 X £100 - Settled in Full

Nationwide £1641 - Settled in Full inc Default and CCJ Removed by Court Order

NatWest £2215.60- Settled in Full and Removed Default Natice

Woolwich £3690 - Settled in Full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, I've been reading this thread in detail for a long long time and I'm truly insensed by these people.

 

Probably it's not quite this simple but I thought it might be some help to chip in my thoughts at this stage -

 

Cant you force an action against them under the ENTIRE data protection act ? ......it seems to me that the act is not specific enough in many areas and could be interpreted in different ways too.....this is esentially the arguement of both parties involved....therefore - what you are asking the court to decide is how the act can be interpreted in respect of which section overrides another ?

 

Apologies for my ignorance, as unfortunately I don't have much knowledge or experience in this field, however, sometimes it is worth stating something that might seem obvious ! .....I hope you beat their team of smart ass lawyers mate - got my fingers crossed for you.

Learned fools speak their nonsense in better language than the unlearned, but they are still fools and it is still nonsense !

Link to post
Share on other sites

in laymans terms - I've served a notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act.

 

Vodafone have refused to accept it citing Information Commissioners Office say they can process data based on Schedule 2 para. 6

 

Section 10 of the Data Protection Act only allows exceptions under paras. 1-4 not 6.

 

How do I turn this into something that meets the requirements of the notice from court today?

 

Well at first glance:

 

Dayglo is not launching an action to strike out a default on a credit file. He has served notice on Vodaphone under S10 of the Data Protection Act to cease and desist processing his personal data as per:

 

"10. - (1) Subject to subsection (2), an individual is entitled at any time by notice in writing to a data controller to require the data controller at the end of such period as is reasonable in the circumstances to cease, or not to begin, processing, or processing for a specified purpose or in a specified manner, any personal data in respect of which he is the data subject, on the ground that, for specified reasons... etc"

 

Section 15(1) of the data Protection Act states that:

 

The jurisdiction conferred by sections 7 to 14 is exercisable by the High Court or a county court or, in Scotland, by the Court of Session or the sheriff.

 

Therefore the county court appears to have jurisdiction to hear the case.

 

However - If Vodaphone were to comply with the notice served by Dayglo would that in and of itself cause the default to be removed? If yes no problem, if no then how is Dayglo arguing for removal of the default?

 

In any event the case as I understand it is purely brought under S10 of the DPA and as quoted above the county court has jurisdiction.

 

Need to knock the above up into a court submission. I'll have another look tomorrow as I'm fried at the mo; it's been a difficult few days.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...