Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO services, Barclaycard and debt relief order help please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Under the advice of wiser people than myself i have started a thread here to explain my situation and ask for a little bit of help.

 

I have received a lovely "threatener" from HFO services for a Barclaycard debt that i thought i had out run. The debt is for nearly £3000. I had a little panic and considered ringing them but after reading the posts on this forum from people concerning HFO i decided to try other things. I have been to CAB and they put me in touch with the National debt line people.

 

I am on long term incapacity benefit and after working out my incomings and out goings i have just under £30 a month left to put towards any debt repayment. i Stated in another thread that i was considering a Debt relief order that would wipe out the debt for no cost to myself after a year so long as my circumstances do not change - ie. debts under 15 thousand - no assets - and less than £50 a month after outgoings all paid. I was advised that i should not do this if it is my only debt ( which it is ) and to not even send a Hold action letter to HFO.

As i have no expertise in this area at all and have no other debts and am not likely to accrue and more debts, i would be very grateful for any further advise. The DRO sounded like a good idea to me - is it not?

 

Thanks in advance

 

LBP

Link to post
Share on other sites

To try and help can you give us a bit more information.

 

When did you originaly get your Barclaycard

When was the last payments you made on it?

 

What exactley have HFO sent you in the post so far?

 

Are you able to upload it removing any personal information and agreement numbers etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said on the other thread do not reply to them and do not follow the advice from National Debt Helpline unless you have more debts.

 

HFO will have loaded interest on this alleged debt, and a file transfer fee, and alleged 'legal tracing fees' (have seen this on a letter a colleague brought in - getting them on the site too - charging £500 for tracing them).

 

Ignore them for now and see what else they come up with - don't forget to watch out for 'Silverpoint Delivery or First Logistics cards posted second class from SW19 claiming you have to contact them re important information or documents they can't release until they have confirmed you are you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

 

Welcome to the forums.

 

Debt Relief Orders are excellent options as they can prevent creditor action quickly, they will also allow you to become debt-free after the 12 month period. What I especially like is the fact that creditors are banned from chasing people during that 12 months.

 

Option b is to try to see if there is a legal challenge as to the enforceability of the agreement. This might take longer, during that time HFO may continue to press for payment. Ultimately you might be abkle to get them to stop chasing if the debt isn't legally enforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone - i cannot upload any photos of my one and only communication from HFO but i can tell you that it was exactly the same one as Dogtrainer uploaded

I have not used or even seen my barclay card for over 4 and a half years and i think i have had it around ten years ( give or take )

What i really want to know is what is wrong with doing the DRO? And what if they take me to court? Ive never had to deal with people like this before so i am wary to say the least - im not stupid but i dont wish to get myself in more trouble when the debt relief order will get me out of trouble - i bow to those with more experience and better judgement :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i really want to know is what is wrong with doing the DRO? And what if they take me to court? Ive never had to deal with people like this before so i am wary to say the least - im not stupid but i dont wish to get myself in more trouble when the debt relief order will get me out of trouble - i bow to those with more experience and better judgement :)

 

Hi there.

 

There is nothing wrong with having a DRO. In fact the benefits are:

 

a) HFO will be prevented from being able to contact you, also they will not be able to use any type of egal proceedings against you whilst the DRO is in place

b) interest and charges are guaranteed to be frozen

c) at the end of the 12 months the debt is written-off and you can make a fresh start

 

the drawbacks are:

 

a) the DRO will appear on your credit file for 6 years and affect your ability to borrow during that time, it's likely your credit file has already been significantly affected anyway

b) for the 12 month period your name will appear on a database of people in formal insolvency options

 

The route of challenging your credit agreement is perfectly fine too, it may take a while and there is no guarantee that the agreement is unenforceable (which is why people will look at it on here!). Also, some courts have granted court orders against unenforceable agreements - this process can take time. In all honesty if you're looking for a quick solution the DRO is certainly worth considering.

 

Best wishes,

 

Seq.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the advice is - it may not be worth doing the DRO if this is your only debt. The HFO purchased debt could be unenforcable and will probably become Statute Barred in a year and a half anyway. You are not 'in trouble' you have committed no crime and have to put your own priorities first.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the advice is - it may not be worth doing the DRO if this is your only debt. The HFO purchased debt could be unenforcable and will probably become Statute Barred in a year and a half anyway. You are not 'in trouble' you have committed no crime and have to put your own priorities first.

 

A very succinct answer.

 

The key issue is how you feel about challenging the debt. Most long-standing forum folks can tell you that many debts can be challenged, it just takes time. Also, the legal system is (sadly) unpredicatble, the creditor might win if it ever got to court. Having said that, you could always get a DRO at that point anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, today i received a new letter from the lovely HFO telling me i now only have 72 hours to contact them or they will get very cross indeed. They also ,very helpfully, included a few photocopied sheets of paper telling me "what to do if i cannot pay my judgement" .. and the amount i owe has been raised a little bit for their troubles.

Im still unsure if i should just ignore them completely or go with the DRO.

Thanks again for everyones input :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest hitting them with a CCA request and find out if they are entitled to pursue you for this. This will cost a £1 postal order and you give them 12 plus 2 working days to come back with a valid agreement. If not you can place the account in dispute.

 

I will find the letter link for you.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, today i received a new letter from the lovely HFO telling me i now only have 72 hours to contact them or they will get very cross indeed. They also ,very helpfully, included a few photocopied sheets of paper telling me "what to do if i cannot pay my judgement" .. and the amount i owe has been raised a little bit for their troubles.

Im still unsure if i should just ignore them completely or go with the DRO.

Thanks again for everyones input :)

 

DCAs always give ridiculous timescales, it actually takes a fair while to get to the court stage, you should consider sending the CCA just to fend them off for a while!

 

Best wishes,

 

Seq.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to CCA letter, send recorded delivery with a £1 postal order, do not sign. Let us know if anything is returned - after 12 plus 2 days you can send them the account in dispute letter. If you can find out if this debt is actually enforcable and HFO have a right to collect it, you can then make an informed decision about the CRO.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?414-CCA-request-letter.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

if you are on benefits and have very little in the way of disposable income or assets i doubt very much if this bunch of parasites will bother chasing you anyway once they know that...send letter for cca and lets see what they come up with

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all - to be honest i have printed out all the relevant letters to send but i have not sent them - they sent me the "72 hours or we will get you" letter a while ago now and i have not heard anything from them since.

Im going to ignore them for a while longer and see what happens - to be honest my fear is - if i write to them then they will be sure they have my address - they have no actual proof of anything at the moment. If it gets serious again i will follow all the kind advice i read on here

Now - knowing my luck - tomorrow i will get a court summons. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that is a good tactic - just ignore for now and don't let them get at you, you have the ammunition if they come back. Keep in touch. BR should always be the last resort,

 

They will only take you to court if they think it is worth their while

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am still trying to "pretend i dont exist" i realise i may have to face up to reality but i was wondering - i have received another letter - this one entitled "schedule of litigation" - what is the procedure for being taken to court?

Will i be made aware of when a court hearing is or can they do this without me? Will i receive actual letters from the court telling me when the case is? I really have no idea about this at all. Is it worth still ignoring their letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...