Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hfo capital limited


tony c
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3809 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 665
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

they sent the original claim and judgement in the post so by my reckoning tomorrow or fri we should have them, i cant see why they didnt have copies of the said docs but the clerk of the court was adamant they didnt so we will see in the morning.

 

Was this Wandsworth Court?

They have sent you the originals - and they - the court - have NOT kept any copies?

Or am i reading this wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok DB will do just spoke to a barrister friend of mine and she is on about the set aside as well will let you know what happens

 

Could you not ask this friend to give you advice about your rights to the court Docs?

 

the N244link3.gif form am waiting for the original claim form from the courts to decide the next course of action

 

This was posted on the 28th October - what was the N244 form for again?

Waiting for original form from court - This was 21 days ago.

 

Think i will be following SG1 on this - i have come over all Theo wotsit after re-reading this thread.

Edited by dadofholly
Link to post
Share on other sites

went to the bank yesterday as an annonymous £100 pound was taken from the misses account asked the bank clerk who took it and to our surprise it was HFO, now i was under the illusion that HFO couldnt take money out of the account until all this was sorted with the courts, this was the original agreement that the misses set up with HFO when she was in contact with them i said before in one of the posts that she phoned them as soon as we got a letter from HFO that she tried to arrange a payment plan with them, this they accepted but stated that the payments were entirley VOLUNTARY this was on the 5th of oct and the misses then gave them the bank details for payment of £100 pounds every month to come out on the 15thof every month, now if they have accepted this which they have and we have the letter havnt they entered into an agreement and by going the route they have now taken are they in default by going to court to get the whole 18k in one lump sum. i didnt think that once they accepted £100 pounds monthly they could chop and change how they recovered the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all

 

The £100 is probably the original Direct Debit set up and no one has stopped it. If this ever gets anywhere near a judge you can explain all this.

 

Without any more concrete information from you - it is not easy to offer advice, I am afraid.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

donkey the 18k is frozen not the account i explained this mate sorry if that sounds rude but am ****ed of that no post has turned up yet was on to the courts all day yesterday

and its only 6 days till the hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

donkey the 18k is frozen not the account i explained this mate sorry if that sounds rude but am ****ed of that no post has turned up yet was on to the courts all day yesterday

and its only 6 days till the hearing

 

This can’t be right. Sorry, mate, this kind of thing doesn’t just happen – something’s going on here. Why is your other half not actually going to the court and getting copies of these documents? Is there something she’s hiding? This is a serious situation, and it is not being dealt with properly. Going to the court would sort it out.

 

Frankly, this is getting ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what more can i do went down there to get the claim form and judgement they said its been posted i cant make the post hurry up i aint being rude am being totally honest with everyone on here this aint no game its far from it if you feel you dont want to help then fine i cant make you am getting a bit irate at the remarks that are coming my way, ias i said i am being totally honest about this and so is the misses, now when i get the docs i will put them on here and if you want to advise that would be good if you dont then thats fine, my appology if this sounds ungrateful but its hard not being ****ed off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the hearing on the 26th is to see if hfo can get the whole 18k in one go didnt send off the n244 form as a few people on here said not to do it as they aint seen the original claim and judgement as hfo might not actually own the debt and the fact we didnt recieve the said claim so am waiting for the postman to deliver it, which is takin a friggin age.

Link to post
Share on other sites

donkey b i have just checked the companies house web page and HFO CAPITAL the ones taking us to court ARE NOT LISTED but HFO SERVICES are is this right ????/

 

HFO Capital Ltd is an Irish company, so won’t be at Companies House.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what more can i do went down there to get the claim form and judgement they said its been posted i cant make the post hurry up i aint being rude am being totally honest with everyone on here this aint no game its far from it if you feel you dont want to help then fine i cant make you am getting a bit irate at the remarks that are coming my way, ias i said i am being totally honest about this and so is the misses, now when i get the docs i will put them on here and if you want to advise that would be good if you dont then thats fine, my appology if this sounds ungrateful but its hard not being ****ed off.

 

Have you asked the court what address they claim to have sent the docs too? have you not moved somewhere along the line since this process started?

 

If they are "sending" these docs to the correct - current - address it would take 2/3 days max. Its been over 3 weeks.

Edited by dadofholly
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...