Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

underpaid tax on Incapacity Benefit


moozer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4986 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I could really do with some help here. Yesterday I received two letters from HM Revenue & Customs stating that I have underpaid taxes on my Incapacity Benefit for the tax years 2008-09 and 2009-10.

 

I have been in receipt of IB for approximately 9 years and this is the first time I have heard of having to pay tax on this benefit.

 

Looking back on last years P60 (substitute) that I receive yearly from jobcentreplus, it states that I have a Tax Code: NULL. I thought this meant that I was ineligible to pay taxes on this benefit, but it appears that the taxman has different ideas.

 

I am married and we have 5 children and the IB is supposed to be there to help us live on what the government tells us we have to live on. The letters from the taxman state that I now owe £380.80 for 2008-09 and £733.40 for 2009-10.

 

I am at a loss as to what to do. I've never had this before and now it seems I am liable for 2010-11 as I haven't paid this tax.

 

How am I and my family be expected to live on such a low income AND be taxed for it? I don't get it?

 

Is this right?

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. It sounds to me as if your tax code could have been wrong, but I need to do a bit more digging. Did you have any income at all apart from the IB and can you tell me how much they paid you each month please?

 

You're sure that 'nul' is your tax code and not the tax that was or wasn't deducted from your IB?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS Having checked on directgov, each individual is entitled to receive £6475 this tax year without paying tax.

 

You need to work out how much taxable income/benefits you received in those tax years. I believe IB is taxable and if you had other taxable benefits in your own name, they could affect the calculations and count towards the £6475.

 

Please tell me some more if you can.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, Thanks for responding. The only other income we have is through Child Tax Credit/Child Benefit. The P60 (Substitute) shows Total taxable benefit paid for the year up to 5th April 2010 (total paid £8238.03) and shows "Tax Code: NULL Week 1:N" and "Total Tax deducted: £0.00" I get paid fortnightly (approximately £317).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, Thanks for responding. The only other income we have is through Child Tax Credit/Child Benefit. The P60 (Substitute) shows Total taxable benefit paid for the year up to 5th April 2010 (total paid £8238.03) and shows "Tax Code: NULL Week 1:N" and "Total Tax deducted: £0.00" I get paid fortnightly (approximately £317).

 

 

In addition the Tax Calculation shows "Basic Rate at 20%" this is on the difference of £1763

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello I would need to check the tax position, but whose name is the child tax credit/benefit in please?

 

HB

 

The Child benefit is in my wife's name and the Child Tax Credit is both of us

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused. According to directgov, both child benefit and child tax credits aren't taxable. Have they sent you anything that tells you how they've calculated your taxable income, I mean how it's broken down?

 

Do you claim any other benefits that could be taxable?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused. According to directgov, both child benefit and child tax credits aren't taxable. Have they sent you anything that tells you how they've calculated your taxable income, I mean how it's broken down?

 

Do you claim any other benefits that could be taxable?

 

My best, HB

 

No other benefits, just the IB. I'll break down the details on the Tax calculation:

Tax year 2009-10

Your income. Incapacity Benefit. Total £8238

Deductions from income. £0.0 Your income after taking away deductions £8238

Tax Allowances. Personal Allowance £6475 Less Total tax Allowances £6475

Income Tax Chargable. Income tax chargable on this amount £1763. Tax on £1763 is Basic Rate at 20% which equals £352.60 (Tax chargeable)

Adjustments. Plus other adjustments £380.80 (this is from tax year 2008-09) Total adjustments plus Tax Payable = £733.40

The result. Tax underpaid = £733.40

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you won't want to hear this and I hope someone else will chip in, but if your income was all IB and it was over the personal allowance [£6475 this tax year, less in previous years], then it was taxable. You're sure that the whole of the £8238 was IB and they haven't slung in something else that wasn't IB?

 

I forget what the rate of IB is, will check.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you won't want to hear this and I hope someone else will chip in, but if your income was all IB and it was over the personal allowance [£6475 this tax year, less in previous years], then it was taxable. You're sure that the whole of the £8238 was IB and they haven't slung in something else that wasn't IB?

 

I forget what the rate of IB is, will check.

 

HB

 

Just come off the phone to the tax office and they are investigating this. They have told me that I have a tax code, but I told them that my P60 (substitute) states NULL. I've claimed that there has been a delay in informing me of any information and their failure to notify me of a tax code. I'm currently waiting for them to get back to me. They found it odd that jobcentreplus have issued a NULL tax code - clearly this doesn't concur with their records.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, that was a good idea, please let us know what they say. But I thought HMRC issued tax codes, not the JCP.

 

Hopefully, some of our gurus will be along later, because I know more about tax than I do about benefits.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, that was a good idea, please let us know what they say. But I thought HMRC issued tax codes, not the JCP.

 

Hopefully, some of our gurus will be along later, because I know more about tax than I do about benefits.

 

My best, HB

 

I stated my grievance that I have had no notice about a tax code and the guy I spoke with thought it was a very odd situation with me believing that my tax code was "null". Will let you know how it pans out. Thanks for looking into things HB. xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome, I hope it works out in your favour. Please keep us posted.

 

And anyone who knows more than I do, please add to the thread.

 

HB x

 

Just come off the phone after a call back from HMRC. They're not moving and are adamant that they have done everything correctly.

 

I'm not having this, but the guy just told me that I cannot do anything other than pay.

 

I need to seek expert advice, because this is ridiculous. They claim that they have issued the correct PAYE tax code, the JCP have no tax code and I'm stuck in the bloody middle and have to pay because of somebody's incompetence and failure to notify me of anything!

 

Any advice from you all? Please help - I have a headache!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i find this a little strange incapacity benefit at the higher rate is 89.90 per week...this is what i receive and i know it is taxable..however that said it no way adds up to the amount of personal allowance that you are allowed yearly....are you sure you have no other income or benefits that may or may not be taxable? your ib should not come to any more than 4674.80 for the year, which means somewhere according to their figures you have also been given another 3563.20... now i am assuming that you only get the higher rate ib?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think i see where the mistake is here on the revenues part...they have taken your entire income including your tax credits...which are not taxable as taxable income...you need to get back to them and explain that your income is only ib which comes to...whatever your rate is higher/lower...whilst the rest of the income is made up of tax credits...not Invalidity Benefit...as it stands they are correct in their figures of the tax you owe...if the amount had been for Invalidity Benefit and any other income that is taxable...however as stated above child benefit and tax credits are not taxable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi moozer, there's something amiss in the I.B. figure because there's no way that you could have got £8238 because (even with the maximum additions for age and disability) the most you could get in a year (2010 -2011) would be £6312.80, in year 2009 - 2010 this was £6297.20.

The benefits rates are here, IB is on page 8.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi moozer, there's something amiss in the I.B. figure because there's no way that you could have got £8238 because (even with the maximum additions for age and disability) the most you could get in a year (2010 -2011) would be £6312.80, in year 2009 - 2010 this was £6297.20.

The benefits rates are here, IB is on page 8.

 

What about an adult dependant increase (if it's in payment)? Although I can't remember if it's taxable or not.

Edited by jabba jones
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about an adult dependant increase (if it's in payment)? Although I can't remember if it's taxable or not.
£53.10 per week. (£2761 PA) - that could explain it.

You could always check your bank statements and look for regular weekly/fortnightly credits and work from there.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...