Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

one month loan- taking paymentsfrom cancelled card!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Had a loan with these last December, I could not afford the repayment the next month so cancelled the card.

 

I don't know how they have managed it but a debit card transaction has come out today 6 months after the card was canceled for £45.

 

Does that mean that canceling your card no longer works and I now have to cancel my bank account?

 

I am fuming, just been on the phone to the bank asking how the hell this has happened and they was not interested - financial bullies all sticking together as usual

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty much the response I got from my bank - LTSB - a debit card payment is a guaranteed method of payment - regardless of whether there are even any funds available in your account - they have your card number - so they take whatever payments they want from you.

It's a bit of a laugh really - it works pretty much like bank charges - just taken from your account at will - no window to question the charges -

 

Payday Express - if you miss a payment with them - they charge you £15 and then after 7 days they charge an extra month's interest - which in a way (the extra interest) would be fine if they then took the payment in an extra months time - at least you will have had it for a month - but nope - at the first opportunity - they will take everything - so you could be 9 days late with your payment - and they'll take the principal - plus two months interest (potentially you may only have got the money 40 days ago) and £15 on top!!! You email them to ask them to waive the fee - or they call you and you "query" the additional charges - and then they go right ahead and take the money anyway!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also wrote an e mail to one month loan complain and tell them they do not have my permission to use my card any longer.

 

I got a reply saying...

 

Please refer to the signed terms and conditions and loan agreement on your members area at www.1monthloan.co.uk. As you are in debt with us debits from your account can be attempted as frequently as deemed necessary until the funds are repaid.

 

Your current outstanding balance is £374.25. Within the next few weeks your account will be sold to an outside recovery company due to the length your account has been outstanding. Your balance with them will be as above, there is a one off settlement option of just £56.13 open.

 

£56.13 is just 15% of your current balance and would close your account in full as fully repaid. This offer will be kept open for 7 days.

 

As explained i can not guarantee that more funds will not be debited from your account. This is because there is no repayment arrangement on your account and it has been outstanding for more than 6 months.

 

I have said deal to the settlement of 15%, its less then I initially had from them even with the £45 they took the other day added to it:-) 15% jusat goes to show how little they sell these debts on to DCA's

 

Although what they say about being able to take as frequently as deemed necessary until the funds are repaid can not be legal surely can it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a new double ended tactic is needed when cancelling debit cards. I took the precaution of writing to my bank stating that the agreement with XXX company had ended and therefore no transactions were allowed from card xxx by them. I also had an email from the company stating the agreement with xxx company had ended and added that for good measure.

 

Same thing happened, some months later xxx company took a monthly rollover fee, so I got that back by speaking to the bank and telling them that I had sent the required letter and therefore it was a bank issue... they got a bit shirty but found the letter and agreed that the original agreement had ended... I got the money back three days later.

 

XXX company also got a shirty email from me, and they refused to admit they were wrong so I complained to Trading Standards and sent their email and the letter to the bank as proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...