Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Required - Charging Order


scetch72
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5004 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

right, need to turn my attention to tomorrow morning, so will say goodnight.Thaks for listening again, im sure im a huge pain, but this is the one and only debt i have, everything else paid up and on time, with money left over at the end of te month, things were really looking up and this has just knocked me for six. But im going to carry on and try my best. Thanks and goodnight

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HiScetch 72

I can only give you moral support, as I only have limited experience of court cases.

I had 2 court cases in 1month, the first one, I was on my own and I agreed out of court,

the 2nd I had a barrister representing me, and I was more confident and won

but after finding this site, the first case I would not have given in so easily, with the knowlage I have found here.

What I am trying to get across if you have no experience and no support , It is very daunting, but with support,(many from CAG) to support you it will be not so bad,

 

hope it works out OK

and I will follow this threadto the end

 

 

All the best

 

Leakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for those kind words, im a lot better today, think the stress of a brand new class hasnt helped, but i will do my very best, someone is pulling a fast one somewhere and i will do my very best with the support to get something done about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope someone can advise on this situation - a family member has raised the money to pay off the debt, do i accept it, pay it and get rid of it, or possibly carry on in the hope that any interest or charges are removed from the debt, I know its a nice dilemma because i have a way out, but the fighter in me wants to carry on to reduce the amount of the debt - so far received nothing from shoosmiths re cpr request. I must say thank you for every piece of advice i have received so far, without this site i would have already a ccj and charging order. I can't say thank you enough, especiallly debbbsy. I do appreciate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi scetch,

You are now in a fantastic postion.

Just because someone else is prepared to pay, don't pay anymore then you have to. Wait & see how they respond, & then decide how to respond.

You have found the fighter in you, stick with it, get yourself the best possible deal. Okay, you may still end up paying (maybe not), but at the end of it, you need to feel you negotiated the best possible deal, not for yourself, but for this fantastic person who is prepared to help you out of this difficult situation.

 

Debsxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i know im a very lucky son with a fantastic dad who's helping- but he said he will keep the money aside until they prove they are entitled to it - he suggests writing to ss stating that IF they can provide full and up to date details of the debt and how it has come about then they can have it - but would also copy this to the court, im damned if they are getting court costs etc for this. I have found the fighter somehow even before the offer, but i have a way out which i know some on here dont have so i feel very lucky, so now im fighting for me, my dad and others on here, time to pay back to to people on here by fighting these numbskulls!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, the 7 days have now passed for shoosmiths to reply to the cpr and i have received nothing, what is the next step? I would like to get into a situation where i can force them into some type of negotiation, as there is money available, but i refuse to give them any money until they can provide definitive proof of any debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its 14 working days

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit confused now 7 or 14? Like ive said i have back up now with the debt but want to have it proved with documentation, so would like to get into some type of negotiation to get this debt down as far as possible, i dont think going to court is going to be an option, i want to try and get this sorted before we get that far. any advice is seriously appreciated. many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

cca request is 14 working days.

 

the sar is 40 calander days.

 

what you have sadly done since the start of this tread is have some belief that was they have said they MIGHT do is correct & that all that they say is correct....it's NOT.

 

you are now playing a game of catchy slowly monkey.

 

you've batted them away as they've found out your not a mug to be fleeced by their [problem] letters.

 

for now....you need to wait.

 

they've now been firmly put in their place by you

they must play their cards or quit.

 

they will quit by default on the cca.

 

then you play your hand .... a nice big reclaim, but you need the info in the SAR to do that.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe

 

been away and done some reading...its 7 days

 

this might help you too:

 

An order that unless within 14 days of the making of an order upon this application the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on 27th July 2010 pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely the agreement, the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court with the costs of this case to be paid by the Claimant to the Defendant to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

The application is made because of the Claimant's refusal to comply with the Defendant's CPR 31.14 request and the documents are required owing to the age of the case and to enable the proper preparation of a Defence.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i'll give them one day lee-way, so if i have nothing in mondays post - thats properly 7 working days, i start on the process of getting this whole clam struck out because they have not furnished me with the documents

Link to post
Share on other sites

From reading on here, it seems many solicitors/debt collection places dont really respond to the cpr 31.14 request. Is the next step to attempt to get the whole claim thrown out, or are there other steps that you have to go through - would it be a good idea for me to write to shoosmiths to say that if they can provide true documentation i am willing to make a payment to them to satisfy the debt (if there is one) - i suppose i want this millstone to just go now and i can get on with my life. But I also want to carry on fighting and make shoosmiths and arrow globals life as uncomfortable as possible by striking while the iron is hot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, nothing received today and they have now exceeded the 7 working days asked for in the cpr 31.14, so my questions are, after reading extensively on here do i now hit them with the n244 - the one about making them give up what they have in 14 days or strike out claim, do i continue to wait and see what happens with the defence form that has gone in. I just feel they have been incredibly rude by not doing whats asked, and i want to make them pay! If i am to do anything id love to get it all sent for wednesday so any advice is greatly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

would it be a good idea for me to write to shoosmiths to say that if they can provide true documentation i am willing to make a payment to them to satisfy the debt (if there is one) - i suppose i want this millstone to just go now and i can get on with my life.

 

Hi scetch,

I can understand your concerns, you want this resolved quickly. But the game you are playing requires patience & stamina (which as a teacher are attributes I know you must have :-)). The ball is now in shooo's court, you have done everything required, but you must give them the opportunity to respond. The longer they take, & any refusal to comply only strengthens your case.

 

Debs xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

still nothing received from shoo's, im presuming that they havent got anything otherwise i would have heard by now, cca request to nationwide has been in for around 4 working days as with SAR the same time. It will be interesting to see what they come up with, i so just want to beat them now, its more a battle rather than feeling ive lost already, they can now come and have a go if they think they're hard enough, thanks again for everyone who has helped me find this strength, goodness knows where it has come from. Cpr now 8 working days old.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...