Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA and Atos! A legal case for violation of human rights?


cameronjcw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I totally agree with both of you there. They don't take anything into consideration. Not medication not the fact that you may be currently receiving treatment. I think they would be happy just to try and work us all into an early grave!

 

This is an article that is available on the benefits and work website!

 

Thousands will lose benefits as harsher medical approved

 

Tens of thousands of claimants facing losing their benefit on review, or on being transferred from incapacity benefit, as plans to make the employment and support allowance (ESA) medical much harder to pass are approved by the secretary of state for work and pensions, Yvette Cooper.

The shock plans for ‘simplifying’ the work capability assessment, drawn up by a DWP working group, include docking points from amputees who can lift and carry with their stumps. Claimants with speech problems who can write a sign saying, for example, ‘The office is on fire!’ will score no points for speech and deaf claimants who can read the sign will lose all their points for hearing.

Meanwhile, for ‘health and safety reasons’ all points scored for problems with bending and kneeling are to be abolished and claimants who have difficulty walking can be assessed using imaginary wheelchairs.

Claimants who have difficulty standing for any length of time will, under the plans, also have to show they have equal difficulty sitting, and vice versa, in order to score any points. And no matter how bad their problems with standing and sitting, they will not score enough points to be awarded ESA.

In addition, almost half of the 41 mental health descriptors for which points can be scored are being removed from the new ‘simpler’ test, greatly reducing the chances of being found incapable of work due to such things as poor memory, confusion, depression and anxiety.

There are some improvements to the test under the plans, including exemptions for people likely to be starting chemotherapy and more mental health grounds for being admitted to the support group. But the changes are overwhelmingly about pushing tens of thousands more people onto JSA.

If all this sounds like a sick and rather belated April Fools joke to you, we’re not surprised. But the proposals are genuine and have already been officially agreed by Yvette Cooper, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. They have not yet been passed into law, but given that both Labour and the Conservatives seem intent on driving as many people as possible off incapacity related benefits, they are likely to be pursued by whichever party wins the election.

We know that many people will find this news deeply upsetting and even frightening and we know that some people will condemn us for publicising the planned changes or for the language that we are using to do so. But we also believe that it’s not too late to stop these ugly plans in their tracks if claimants and the organisations that represent them act now.

With 1.5 million incapacity benefit claimants waiting to be assessed using the work capability assessment in the next few years and tens of thousands of people already on ESA and set to be reviewed annually, these changes will be of great concern to many voters – if they find out about them before polling day.

So, please spread the word in forums and blogs and to people you know who may be affected. Ask any disability charity you have a connection with to speak out now, before election day, against these plans. You might also want to contact local newspapers and radio to warn people about the proposals.

And above all, contact not just your MP, but the other candidates in your constituency, and let them know you will not be voting for anyone who does not loudly condemn this shameful attack on sick and disabled claimants.

These plans really are a potential seat loser, but only if enough people know about them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jsa is not the right benefit for those that have health problems/disabilities',you are expected to be job ready

 

You are right there but that's where I was thrown straight from Income Support last year I suppose the dwp are eager to cut benefit without delay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

almost half of the 41 mental health descriptors for which points can be scored are being removed from the new ‘simpler’ test, greatly reducing the chances of being found incapable of work due to such things as poor memory, confusion, depression and anxiety.

 

I am just filling my IB50 form I was surprised how short it was and there isn't much related to my ill health I suffer from panic attacks and anxieties which give me depression my condition gets worst when I am outside there are lots of things that I cannot do, I cannot go near a tube station, scalators, crowded places, the list are endless I shall tell them in a separate sheet of papers what I suffer and challenge them to test me appropriately I am prepared to be wired up and taken to the places where my panic attacks is tenfold then see what they would say it's all too well stating about bending, kneeling and pick up which I can do whilst in the safety in my own home even though I do suffer from panic attacks and anxiety indoors but I can just drop what I am doing and go to lie down somewhere until my panic attacks wear off I could not do that if I am working and away from the safety of my home my job is very demanding so until I conquer my fear of being outdoor I will not get better. Even my Jobcentre advisor told me not to look for work whilst I am in that state just concentrate on my health I've had a few panic attacks whilst talking to her and 100% I break in a sweat just being there when I was signing on they've see me in bad states all the times it's amazing how the Job Centre Advisor behaves very different to the one that don't see you face to face. I shall state this in my notes I do not fear them because I am talking the truth I've even ask the dwp to give me a lie detector test they won't do it but they are prepare to deny my illness and throw me on JSA don't make sense does it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please spread the word in forums and blogs and to people you know who may be affected. Ask any disability charity you have a connection with to speak out now, before election day, against these plans. You might also want to contact local newspapers and radio to warn people about the proposals.

And above all, contact not just your MP, but the other candidates in your constituency, and let them know you will not be voting for anyone who does not loudly condemn this shameful attack on sick and disabled claimants.

These plans really are a potential seat loser, but only if enough people know about them.

 

I am afraid I have try telling people we must fight this new system even in different forums but for some reason I seems to be scaring people off. It surprises me when people come in the forum almost crying or suicidal about their failed medicals or benefits stop or very frightened about going to their medicals but when you say the word fight for your rights they run away. Alas! I will fight for my own rights if I suceed hopefully I can convince people this is the way to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can sympathise complately!

 

I have been speaking to a really amazing woman the last few days called Moira (Mo) Fifield who has offered to take on my case and has years of welfare experience, been comparing notes on our conditions and its very interesting to say the least. I also got a call from girl in my local MP's office who asked if I would need a support worker, hell yes!! She also said she will call the benefits place but I think most of them were closed today cause of the bank holiday so hopefully hear from her tomorrow, before I go to the dreaded job centre.

 

She has told me to pass on her details to anyone who needs help with the ESA/DWP and is genuine, free help! All she asks is you pay for your own postage and phone calls which IMO is more than fair. Am probably going to be setting up a welfare website for her and her friends which will am sure have lots of valuable information and contacts, lots of welfare places have disappeared because of lack of funding.

 

Anyway if its ok with the site owner can I post link to my site or her e-mail which she has given me freely and told me to pass on the info to others, am hoping I can learn from her, she really is an amazing woman, she is bedridden and is so ill, a lot more ill than I and probably many others are and still managed to help others and with a smile on her face! :) I am still wishing to puruse the violation of human rights thing although still waiting to hear back from the lawyer I e-mailed and will also ask Mo as she already has he own case going to the EC because of the treatment her and her children have had to put up with which is absolutely horrific!!

 

Anyway thats a quick update, its great to feel like you are doing something to be able to help others in the same situation, even just a small message or communication with others in the same position makes such a huge difference! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you do still get a lot of people who sort of retreat when you invite them to fight for the right to be treated as a human being. I think a lot of people are so scared by this new system that they do get too scared to do anything about it in case it makes their already terrible situation worse. Ive been far too apprehensive the last year myself but I think that was more down to me trying to ignore my condition and jsut get on with things which really doesnt work at all. Im with you though and will fight to the death if I have to. I have nothing to lose anyway but plenty to gain! :)

 

please spread the word in forums and blogs and to people you know who may be affected. Ask any disability charity you have a connection with to speak out now, before election day, against these plans. You might also want to contact local newspapers and radio to warn people about the proposals.

And above all, contact not just your MP, but the other candidates in your constituency, and let them know you will not be voting for anyone who does not loudly condemn this shameful attack on sick and disabled claimants.

These plans really are a potential seat loser, but only if enough people know about them.

 

I am afraid I have try telling people we must fight this new system even in different forums but for some reason I seems to be scaring people off. It surprises me when people come in the forum almost crying or suicidal about their failed medicals or benefits stop or very frightened about going to their medicals but when you say the word fight for your rights they run away. Alas! I will fight for my own rights if I suceed hopefully I can convince people this is the way to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all very Orwellian - naming a sickness/disability benefit - "Employment Support Allowance" for people who can't be employed, only to tell those same people that they do not qualify for it.

 

dj

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have the same panic attacks and phobia around people,i also found the job centre to a source of problems too,outbreaks of temper from people out of the blue often shouting does nothing for an individual with these problems that has to sit and watch this,and pressure from the job centre as someone is expected now to attend courses with everyone else.they will refer someone to disability charities sometimes however time is short,they expect you to take control of your life instantly which is impossible,all this with vacancies in short supply and heavily over applicated.

 

it is illegal to discriminate against the disabled but only one dwp member of staff has acknowledged it to me that it goes on and proving it is extremely difficult,another point overlooked is the real possibility of the time spent signing on repeatadly for some considerable time as by the terms of the illness someone is at a disadvantage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am off to job centre today, wrist splints on and all and I will be recording the conversation, had a woman from disability now last week asking if I would like to pasrticipate in a BBC documentary about disability benefits and the state of current system, I said yes but didnt wanna be on telly but now I will if I have to, am trying to get people together for this to get their point, experinces accross and will also be contacting channel 4, channel 5 and as many papers as possible that will listen.

 

Let me know if you are interested in helping. I also have contact for a rather amazing woman who is a welfare benefits expert and is severly disabled, terrible nightmare scenario she is in and still helping others, she has a few friends in same posiotion who are also welfare experts. Anywya have to go get ready for my appt at the Knob Centre!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is illegal to discriminate against the disabled but only one dwp member of staff has acknowledged it to me that it goes on and proving it is extremely difficult,another point overlooked is the real possibility of the time spent signing on repeatadly for some considerable time as by the terms of the illness someone is at a disadvantage.

My Job Centre advisor told me the same things she always used to remind me that she doesn't treat people badly

"I am not one of them she used to say to me" she also told me appparently there are a lot of new recruits that has been trained to ignore peoples' illnesses and pleas they are form the new school the old school people are more sympathetic hence! they got rid of the old and in with the new trained uncaring staff also they've changed the words claimants to customers because it has two different meaning I don't know why I should be dwp's customer as I am not buying any grocery from them I am merely claiming some money due to my disabilitate ill health. A customer buy a pint of milk at a grocery shop a claimant claim money because they are unable to work or out of work. I certainly will remind them of their discriminations with regards to my health the IB50 is barely directed to my mental ill health just a little bit of question. The way to get to the dwp is give them your job descriptions and why you cannot at present hold down a job with that skill. I know someone that has work with British Rail for years and has had a massive breakdown and been laid off work because of the great danger it entail part of the person's job was being a watch man which mean they have to watch out for incoming trains whilst the rail men lays the rail track I would like to see the dwp tell the person to go back to that sort of work.

 

how many times are spent waiting if you suffer from panic attacks are always a disadvantage sometimes I just want to run out the building and the longer one waits the worst it gets. There are always cameras everywhere in the dwp building everywhere you turn there is one I would challenge them to watch the videos on gthe many sign on I went for they can see for themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my so called interview went as expected, sat argueing with both the manager and the so called advisor who both ignored anything I said about my condition or the medication I am on, put in complaint in writing, they tried to bull**** me all the way through but tehy have seriously picked a fight with the wrong person. I recorded it all!!! I told them at the end that I had I dont give a **** and u know what they said "thats an infringement of our civil liberties" lol yeah I asked them what about mine!!! No answer for that effing idiots I swear they will rue teh day they picked on me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

peoples illnesses are not going to disappear overnight,its clearly wrong to take this view.it came about a while back when the now disgraced peter hain was mistakenly advised or took the view that mental health problems' could be managed by work and that everyone would be better off as a result.this went against the laws of jobseekers allowance that people who were deemed sick were not entitled to this benefit this looks have been papered over too,as mentioned a job has to be taken if offered and a person is expected by the rules to be fit to take it,or sanctions would follow.this has created a situation where people have been told they unable to claim esa and have been told by the job centre that they are unfit to claim jsa.

 

it is a situation where attempts are made to paper over illnesses,while it might bring about short term cost savings,the individual is at the receiving end.the disabled are entitled to reasonable adjustments in the workplace however what the real outcome of this is unclear,certainly the adviser that mentioned to me about discrimination and proof went on that to mention about the possibility of never working again because of the time personally i experienced unemployed, another later meeting with another adviser and was informed that "i don't tell people that". from my own experience i stayed on jsa when multiple times' it was suggested by the job centre in the past to take the then incapacity benefit,i did not but given the outcome it has to be given consideration to fact that jobseekers is not the right idea as from my own experience at least finding employment is non existent.

 

there are disability advisers in the job centre but they are limited to what they can do,again they can refer you to programs for the disabled,but these tend to run quickly have expectations' that are not easily met due to the economic climate before disability is encountered and are again limited in outcome.its difficult to say what the outcome of success will be for those transferred onto jobseekers,however its hoped it wont be a negative long term one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gets my goat is the research study which Lord Fraud (Freud) and HMG keep trotting out, the study which says work is good for mental health. The study was entirely funded by UNUM Provident, the same company which helped ATOSh to develop the "Logic-integrated Medical Assessment" (LiMA) and further helped ATOSh in their bid to get the DWP Medical Assessor contract. UNUM created the forerunner of LiMA for the U.S. health insurance industry in order to reduce the numbers and amounts of successful medical insurance claims - they achieved this goal by redefining illnesses and disabilities to make it harder to pass the medical examinations. UNUM have lost numerous law-suits in the U.S. over refused payouts. In 2007 Unum was forced by state regulators to reopen 290,000 disability insurance claims that had been rejected, including a case where 'Unum insisted that a man who had quintuple bypass surgery was fit to go back to his job at a stock brokerage firm, even though his doctors said the stress might kill him' and where Unum 'refused benefits to a man who had had multiple heart attacks'. This behaviour caused California Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi to state that 'UnumProvident is an outlaw company. It is a company that for years has operated in an illegal fashion.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bi Polar Bear I really wish I could give you some kind of help or advice. Are you still receiving your benefits currently??

 

Im still getting messed around feels likie y, the last straw for me too today. Please hang in there if you send me a PM Theres a woman I know who might be able to put you in touch with someone who could help.

 

My brain is fried with all this crap todaym feel like Im gonna throw up or pass out or both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, it's someone posting about their experiences that others can share in, and a good sounding board, it's absolutely fine, and I'm sure others will enjoy reading it.

 

unfortunately the time people read this they are a victim of unfairness and the damage is sadly done,if any comments help prevent a repeat then it is worthwhile,its not a sounding board its a fact of reality faced by those who are sick and disabled,the sickness benefits system was widely abused by the former dhs over the years,and indeed this continued up to the last year or or so where hard core long term unemployed were encouraged/pushed onto this benefit for convenience of unemployment statistics' attending dhs interviews' it was once said to me that "people who are not considered to find work are placed on another benefit",now because of cost vast numbers of sick people are being unfairly treated by placing them on jsa giving little consideration to someones illness,outlook or long term prospects of actually finding work at all,and attempting to claim people as fit as a fiddle,this term might be considered appropriate given the dubious methods used are based on the american insurance industry that has been employed here by the dwp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Myself and a couple of other people with experience of this and other rare conditions are working together to start a charity to help people with rare conditions access better medical, social and welfare advice and help. The main site should be up and running in 2-3 days at the very most and we have lots of other plans to bring all the other smaller organizations in that deal wtih these and other rare conditions. I will obviously run the link by site admin here before I post it but really excited about it and we all hope its going to help in a lot of ways, too much to write about at the moment but well you can have a look in a few days once its sorted!!

 

Just giving this a quick bump cause I havent forgotten about this thread and this site will also be addressing the issues discussed in this and other similar threads!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

its extremely hard to find any employment with a disability any mention particularly mental health and the attitude changes on the phone immediately ,its also expensive using public transport when on jobseekers allowance and the job centre have unrealistic expectations and try to push for ridiculous distances and you dont feel like it,i am back in the doctors in the morning for a review and my mood is terrible.

 

how the government and take the action they are doing and hope it will work i dont know,its not fair to tell people they are fit to work when they are clearly going to have trouble coping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a letter from atos yesterday with the ib50 form in it virtually nothing about mentall illness in it I have bipolar and fibromyalgia and atm am in a bad way due to a fraud investigation ongoing and benefits problems from that this feels like the last straw to me.
Hi Bipolar bear, I'm on IB and over ten years I've learned this:

On the IB50 the amount of space allowing you to describe how your condition affects you is minimal, it says you can write more on a further page (2 pages further) however that is limited by size as well.

You obviously have a computer, do you have a printer? I say this because I recommend that you attach additional info off the form. On this method and on the form you say "see attached pages" (keep a copy of these for reference) and remember to title and number the separate pages "Additional IB50 information, page 1 of (x, how many you send) - NINO: (your national insurance number) + your date of birth + date sent, do this on every page of the separate additional info and keep copies.

If you have been diagnosed with a mental health condition it is important to mention this and stress how you are affected on you worst days Mr. or Mrs Bi-Polar.

 

For most MH sufferers its hard work and long years even to get a correct diagnosis. The shrinks think that it's kinder to be ambiguous and not let us know the name of our illnesses or disorders, however the DWP insists that they should know the name of our condition from the claimant, therefore if you have been diagnosed or seen a shrink you should name them and provide an address if possible.

 

The more additional info you can provide - the better. Apparently I'm too ill to require a medical since I sent them my notes over two and a half years back, they don't even send me an IB50 even though my last one was due 6 months ago, certain conditions aren't required to be examined by the medical test, I think diagnosed Bi-Polar could be one of those. Therefore a well answered IB50 + additional pages could save you the indignity and stress of a medical.

Good luck, Paul.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...