Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

yummy-mummyg VS Fashion World


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I recently cca'ed Fashion world on 5th August 2010. I received a reply from them dated 17th August. I do not have access to a scanner right now, mine has just broken but here is what their letter says:

 

Dear yummy-mummyg

 

Thank you for your letter dated 5th August 2010 which we received 13th August 2010 (?! sent 1st class RD!) the contents of which we note:

 

This personal credit account was opened on 12th August 2009 and is payable on 28 day basis. Credit charges are applicable at the rate of 2.62 pence in the pound (equal to 39.9% APR variable) every 28 days

 

Since the account was opened 9 payments have been made to the account to date totalling ££££

 

The current balance is £££££ with arrears outstanding of ££££

 

Based on the above balance and repayments rate and if no further transactions take place against the account, a total of 25 installments are expected to repay the balance in full consisting of 1 payment of ££££ then 23 subsequent payments every 28 days thereafter of £££ and 1 final payment of £££

 

Please find enclosed a true copy of your credit agreement setting out the terms ad conditions to which you agreed when the account was opened along with the current terms & conditions.

 

We have also enclosed an itemised breakdown of the account dating back to 13th August 2009.

 

When responding to a section 78 request a lender does NOT have to provide a photocopy or other literal copy of the executed agreement nor provide a copy bearing or some other proof of the customer's actual signature.

 

We await hearing from you

 

Now, the agreements they have sent me have my details filled in, in biro and is not my handwriting, nor is my signature on them. This is what I expected as i have never received, nor signed an agreement with fashion world.

What worries me is the last paragraph they wrote - are they lying or not?:?

 

Where do i go now?:?:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they are sadly quite correct

but to go to court, they will need a signed agreement.

 

now why are you questioning the debt?

 

even if the CCA were to be un-en, it sadly does not wipe the debt out, contrary to what these claim co's sprout.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I went down the CCA route was they have been nothing but hassle. I am out of work so we are living on one wage and bringing up a baby.

The CAB were involved and worked out our incoming/outgoings and drew up our SOA which was posted to all debtors with the amount we can afford to pay.

Fashion world refused point blank to accept the payment until our situation improved. We wrote to them and explained they were one of the only debtors to refuse and would they rethink it - no. They wouldnt accept anything lower than the full payments!!

They sent a letter to CAB saying it was because the last order I placed was delivered to me 1 month before I sought advice from CAB - therefore I placed an order knowing full well I was going to be in financial difficulty and wouldnt be able to pay, so apparantly they are well within their rights to demand full payments.

 

The interest and constant charges are increasing my balance to ridiculous levels and they are constantly harrassing me - up to 10 phonecalls in a day, 7 days a week, letters every other day, despite me sending a letter asking them to stop.

They claim if my account is in arrears they are within their rights to call me up to every hour should they need to.

 

I don't dispute the debt, I just want to make the payments I can afford until things improve and not be crippled by their charges and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they should no be phoning 10 times a day you need to report them,

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that you took out the account in 2009, did you do this online, as 'ticking a box' would then count as a signature.

 

With regard to the telephone calls, do you have this in writing = They claim if my account is in arrears they are within their rights to call me up to every hour should they need to. If so, then complain to Oft and Trading Standards throuogh Consumer Direct online and attach a copy file containing the above statement.

 

With regard to Fashion World you could send them this:

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXX

Dear Sirs

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

Yours faithfully,

[NAME HERE]

 

Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act

“S40 Punishment for unlawful harassment of debtors.

A person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under a contract he- harasses the other with demands for payment which, in respect of their frequency, or the manner or occasion of making any such demand, or of any threat or publicity by which any demand is accompanied, are calculated to subject him or members of his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation; falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it; falsely represents himself to be authorised in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment; or utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character, or purporting to have some official character which he know it has not.

A person may be guilty of an offence by virtue of sub-section (1) (a) above if he concerts with others in the taking of such actions as is described in that paragraph, notwithstanding that his own course of conduct does not by itself amount to harassment.”

You can make a complaint to : Ofcom

 

Finally they will not accept your offer of a payment plan. Your income is YOURS and only YOU decide how much you can afford to pay them, they may insist all they like they they will only accept the full amount, but if you were making regular monthly payments to them they would in all probability be thrown out of Court by a Judge tut07.gif

 

Set up a Standing Order, NOT a Direct Debit and pay what you can on a regular basis. If they refuse these amounts, and it is in writing that is their problem and you have a papertrail for the Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that you took out the account in 2009, did you do this online, as 'ticking a box' would then count as a signature.

 

With regard to the telephone calls, do you have this in writing = They claim if my account is in arrears they are within their rights to call me up to every hour should they need to. If so, then complain to Oft and Trading Standards throuogh Consumer Direct online and attach a copy file containing the above statement.

 

With regard to Fashion World you could send them this:

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXX

 

Dear Sirs

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

Yours faithfully,

 

[NAME HERE]

 

 

Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act

“S40 Punishment for unlawful harassment of debtors.

 

A person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under a contract he- harasses the other with demands for payment which, in respect of their frequency, or the manner or occasion of making any such demand, or of any threat or publicity by which any demand is accompanied, are calculated to subject him or members of his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation; falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it; falsely represents himself to be authorised in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment; or utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character, or purporting to have some official character which he know it has not.

 

A person may be guilty of an offence by virtue of sub-section (1) (a) above if he concerts with others in the taking of such actions as is described in that paragraph, notwithstanding that his own course of conduct does not by itself amount to harassment.”

 

You can make a complaint to : Ofcom

 

Finally they will not accept your offer of a payment plan. Your income is YOURS and only YOU decide how much you can afford to pay them, they may insist all they like they they will only accept the full amount, but if you were making regular monthly payments to them they would in all probability be thrown out of Court by a Judge tut07.gif

 

Set up a Standing Order, NOT a Direct Debit and pay what you can on a regular basis. If they refuse these amounts, and it is in writing that is their problem and you have a papertrail for the Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...