Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
    • Hi, Just updating that I'll be submitting the SJPN shortly this evening electronically.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Appeal and submission of supporting evidence - what type and time limit?


nebukhadnezzer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4733 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm going through the ESA Appeals process at present and was wondering:

 

1) What type of supporting evidence is likely to carry more weight? ( I have already submitted a letter from my GP and awaiting a letter from my Consultant Neurologist)

2) Is there a time limit for submission of supporting evidence? ie If so when does the limit start and end?

 

Thanks very much all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

If you have requested an appeal to Tribunal than the Tribunal will be going through ATOSHs 'medical' report as if it was written in stone. Therefore the evidence you want is anything that directly supports your assertion and disproves theirs. [Look at something you disagree with and see what you can find to prove your point] This can be GPs testimonial, Consultants etc and also your own online research as long as it comes from a respected source - don't forget the DWPs own online A to Z of Medical Conditions...

Supporting evidence can be submitted to the Tribunal Service right up until 7-14 days before your actual hearing date. Given this can take up to 9 months to come through you've got plenty of time to research...

Best wishes

Rae

Edited by RaeUK
cos I can...
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I am sorry that I cannot be of much help, except the best thing for you to do is go along to the tribunal. If you can. They won't need to see any evidence if you can get there.

 

Best wishes from me to you x

 

On another note, please can someone tell me how I can post my own topic? I am so new to forums!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang the day before my tribunal just to check everything and was told that medical stuff I had sent was not on file. I even sent it recorded.

I got to the tribunal early, took the paper work with me and the clerk photo copied it and gave it to the tribunal.

I had used a highlighter to show up specific points but this did not show up on the photocopies.

My tribunal was the first one of the day and they kept me waiting for a bit and then called me in.

I was worried that they would not have read it all but they had obviously read everything.

I had made the mistake of not being very detailed on my ESA50 , when it said how far can you walk, I had written - not very far.

So I was questioned a lot about the answers I had given.

When my time comes again I will take a lot of time filling in the ESA50.

The tribunal ladies were lovely, there was just 2 of them and a lady at the back taking notes.

They will not discuss any new medical ailments you may have had since your ATOS medical.

I won and was so relieved and had my first proper nights sleep for months.

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry that I cannot be of much help, except the best thing for you to do is go along to the tribunal. If you can. They won't need to see any evidence if you can get there.

 

Best wishes from me to you x

 

On another note, please can someone tell me how I can post my own topic? I am so new to forums!

 

Hello there, welcome to the forum. Come out of this thread using the back arrow, then scroll up the page with all the thread titles. On the left, there's a blue button, rectangular with white writing, that says something like Start New Thread/Topic. I never remember. That way you'll have your own thread and we can advise you. :)

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...