Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt Sale & Purchase


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't make many posts (can't type quick enough ) and these boards are like Hampton Court Maze-when you're small and can't see over the top.

However dropped this email to Cleggover as per his 'write to me - I'm a man of the people' pitch now he's in temporary charge;

 

When is the calition government going to ban the practice of debt sale and purchase? People should be allowed to deal only with the original lending instituition,which in the main would be banks (and which have to conform to a regime of conduct ) instead of unscrupulous third party companies. These companies fabricate facts,masquerade as lawyers ,harass and threaten many people.They are totally unregulated,have self ascribed cosmetic codes of practice which they flaunt with importunity, and completely ignore the Office of Fair Trading guidelines. The results of such harassment have resulted in many tragedies and untold misery for hundreds of thousands of this country's citizens.

 

Dropped a similar letter to Gordon last year and got a very nice reply on very very nice notepaper saying it was being passed to Mandy for a response.You guessed it-nowt, not even some nice notepaper.

As this is an email I suspect it will remain in the ether.

 

Thanks to CAG I don't fear anything anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I can understand some of the Banks etc just wishing to rid themselves of "difficult debts".

However the DCA's should only be involved if they have ACTUALLY BOUGHT the debt and then should only be allowed to charge A MAXIMUM of 15% more than they paid for the debt -- and NO VAT added on either --(and that's being generous) to the debtor.

 

Of course we would like to see DCA's go out of business PERMANENTLY but -- being a bit of a devils advocate here -- if you DID borrow the money then you really DO have some obligation to pay at least SOME of it back.

 

Of course people's circumstances change -- people lose jobs, get Ill, divorced etc etc and I am not advocating a total avoidance of paying debts back -- but if you DO get into difficulties then there should be a DECENT, HUMANE, and FAIR method of debt collection.

 

Exhorbitant charges, lying and intimidating tactics and threatening rediculous court actions DOES NOBODY ANY GOOD.

 

I've NEVER seen anything like a letter from a DCA saying .......... We understand you might have a problem with XXXXXX from Bank YYYYYY.

 

We are quite prepared to accept YYYYY as a F&F settlement but if you think this is too much please WRITE to us to suggest what you CAN pay back. If you really can't pay anything then send us a reasonable statement of account and we'll then close your account and you won't hear from us again. ..................

 

 

This might actually yield them more money in the long run.

 

Threats etc whatever the rights / wrongs of the situatuion will just annoy a lot of folks and they WILL NEVER GET ANY MONEY.

 

Incidentally I think the whole Northampton thing should also be shut down -- If I'm in Lands End why should I have to deal with the Northampton County Court -- Northampton has NOTHING whatsoever to do with me.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am seriously looking at doing a petition on this, but you have to close all the loopholes on the original petition to get anywhere... last petition I did I got 236 votes before the then government closed it. I am thinking along the lines of:

 

Only the original creditor can place markers on our credit files

 

or

 

If a debt is sold ONLY the arrears at the time of sale can be chased via court, not the whole amount of the debt, regardless of any repayments already made.

 

or

 

If a debt is sold it can only be sold once

 

Hit them where it hurts hard (as they do to us) and the whole Debt Buyers and Sellers Group will be rendered useless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northampton is a bulk clearing court, and once you defend a claim there it is transferred to a local court. It wasn't designed originally for the likes of Hamptons, Bryan Carter et al to use, just for small businesses chasing small debts.

 

I agree that it should be disbanded or realigned so that NO 'solicitor for rent' can use their facilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course there is always another angle, were we the general jo public of this country not already being forced to pay back money to the banks etc. that they lost by recklessness, then perhaps we might have jobs and the wherewithall to pay our own debts!! Perhaps the DCAs should be employed by the Government to chase up the banks for the money they owe us, after all, who is the larger majority - the millions of people of this country being penalised by the Government, or a handful of Banks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...