Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Embracing your unique selfView the full article
    • Hearing held today in court. I attended in person and Evri had an advocate attend on their behalf to defend their position that my contract is with Packlink and not with them. I also provided a copy of Evri's terms and conditions which explains that a contract is entered into when a parcel is sent with Evri. The judge pointed this out to the Advocate and agreed there is a contract between me and Evri under the Ts and Cs. The judge explained that while Packlink are responsible for organising the delivery of the item, it is Evri who are responsible for handling the goods and delivering them, and therefor Evri has a responsibility to handle the goods with reasonable care and skill. So am pleased to say the judge found in my favour. Hearing lasted about 75mins. Evri has been ordered to make payment within 21 days. Also nice to meet @jk2054 in person.
    • Good morning,    I just wanted to update you on the situation.    I have visits piling up with my current employment and they need doing before I finish at the end of this month.  I am moving to Wiltshire in 3 weeks for a new job helping care homes with their Dementia patients. I tried to work it out and at a guess I will be doing about 20-25,000 miles a year. So need a vehicle that can cope with that mileage, my old car would have done it easy but 🤷‍♂️ I have taken out a loan and got a friend to find me a reliable car that can cope with the miles and hasn't been written off in the past.   I phoned Adrian flux to see if I could use the last months insurance on a new car I have bought, the girl I spoke to phoned Markerstudy and asked them but they said no, my new car doesn't have any modifications.    I had an email from someone who saw one of my appeals for information, they live near the site of the accident and know a nearby farmer who has a security camera at his entrance that catches the traffic and specifically registration plates as he has been robbed before. They said they would reach out for me and see if he still has the data. Unfortunately it wont catch the scene of the crash.   The Police phoned me and said they were closing the report I made, even if they found footage of the vehicle at the time I said the actual incident would be my word vs theirs.  My first response was I am sure google maps would show that they turned around at that location which would verify my version of events, but upon reflection I do understand, I have seen people doing make up with both hands while driving, eating from a bowl steering with their knees and veering all over the place. I am sure some of these people go off the road and claim that someone forced them off.    Markerstudy phoned me yesterday to say that my car is now at Copart, the £80 tank of Vpower diesel was emptied on entry to the site for safety reasons, which I get but it sucks.  It is awaiting being assessed and shouldn't be too long, which is a relief.  I am really glad things do not seem to be going the way of the other stories and they seem to moving quickly.   However I was informed that my car was a structural write off before I bought it - this destroyed me, I was almost sick.  and this is going to affect any offer of money - after hearing the first statement this didn't affect me.   They need to wait for the assessor to check it over but it is highly likely to be written off and the maximum they can offer is £2300.  I was desperate for a car as I was working for an agency at the time, no work no pay, and did not do a vehicle check because I didn't know about them.  The seller did not tell me that it had been structurally written off, he told me that it had the front wing damaged while parked and was repaired at an approved repairer.  Markerstudy records state that it was sold at auction, no record of repair at an approved repairer.  I bought it bank transfer with hand written receipt.    It gets worse.    It turns out my airbags should of gone off. For some reason they are not working. I think we can figure out why.  If I had hit that car head on and had no airbags.    Some good news.    I can arrange a time with Copart to go and take my stereo equipment and any personal items that are left in the car only. I cant live without music and need quality sound, my speakers and amps are Hertz and JLaudio, (no I am not a boy racer with booming subs, I am an audiophile on a budget) I was really worried I wouldn't get them back so this is a huge relief for me. It is stuff I have built up over years of saving and collecting. Everything to do with the vehicle and mods I have declared need to stay to be assessed.   The accident has gone as a fault on my record, I have to remove 2 years NCB which means I still have some to declare which is good.  So it appears at this point that it may be resolved quickly, not in the way I was hoping, but not as bad as I presumed it was going to be based upon that tow truck drivers attitude and behaviour and the horror stories I read.   I am not going to buy the car back and try to make money with all the parts on it, I don't have the time or energy.   I may need an xray on my back and neck.  The whole situation has left me feeling physically sick, drained and I need it done.   The lesson learnt from this  -  My conscience is 100% clear, my attitude to safety and strong sense of personal responsibility - A rated tyres even if on credit card, brake fluid flush every year, regular checks of pads and discs, bushes etc, made avoiding what I believed to be a certain broadside collision possible.   Get a dashcam (searching now for the best I can afford at the moment)  -  Research your insurance company before you buy  -  Pay for total car check before you go and see a car and take someone with you if you are not confident in your ability to assess a vehicle.      Thank you to everyone here who volunteers their time, energy and information, it is greatly appreciated.  You helped my sister with some advice a while ago but we weren't able to follow through, she is struggling with long term health conditions and I ended up in hospital for a while with myocarditis, when I got out and remembered it was too late.  I am going to make a donation now, it is not a lot, I wish I could give more, I will try to come back when things are on a more even keel.    Take care
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock - decree received 19-jan - help low income, have not listened to my offers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4849 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No the amount will have 8% interest added annualy.

 

Yes a f&f can be offered at anytime but obviously it is up tp them whether to accept it or not.

 

One other thing is with you owning your home is they may be granted an inhibition order. This means that if at anytime you wish to sell your home, they would be granted payment from the sol/lawyer at time of sale - this only last 5 years so after 5 years they either need to repply for it or it drops off.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

I am at the end of a 3 year battle with NR - if you are not strong go straight to an IVA.

 

If you are willing to ' put a bit of effort into it'. Go straight through the courts for a time to pay order 1974 CCA s 129- simple.

 

Except the NR do not like providing CORRECT statements of accounts under S77 1974,2006 Consumer Act (get reading loads on BIS and Ministry of Justice and hms court service).

 

If the account is not stiputed then its Fastrak and the most is £500 costs. NR rock do not want a disputed claim so they say they are in dialogue, which is great then they can not charge for their extra costs their solicitors incur. It is always possible post judgement to complain to the court and SRA and FOS.

 

Up to you - worth the stuggle or take the easy road, Even if you go for a IVA, and have property, if there is not too much equity you can stilll keep it.

 

Let me know how you gert on, Kindest Christian

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might as well declare your self Bankrupt rather than be tied to an IVA, IVA's are a very very last resort, after you have had plastic surgery changed your name and moved to the costa del sol!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the middle of filling out the necessary forms (i.e. time to pay order), one thing puzzles me slightly that any help would be appreciated...

 

There seems to be two forms to fill in with almost the same information, one is headed "Application for a tme to pay direction under the debtors (Scotland) act 1987" and the other is headed "Application for a time order under the Consumer Credit act 1974".

 

Do I fill them both in with the same information?

 

The other thing that concerns me a bit is, the amount I can afford means that the debt is going to take approximately 20 years to repay, if I'm being fair to other creditors. Might this be considered just too long to be reasonable?

 

Sorry if these questions seem stupid but I've never even seen the inside of a court before never mind actually participated so I'm a little nervous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to pay order is to pay in installments/ lump sum

 

time order is to continue with the loan etc but over longer periods etc

 

you only fill in the time to pay order, what i would suggest is to attach a more detailed i and e

 

Budget Sheet.xls

 

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's it done. I've completed the time to pay order form and included a copy of the agreement (a copy of the one they sent me after a CCA request) and an i&e budget sheet.

 

I asked the court clerk what happens next and he basically said it gets sent back to the solicitors and they either say "ok" in which case I pay what said I could afford or "no" in which case there is a hearing. I'm actually glad it's sort of out of my hands now. I just hope the clerk actually processes the form because I didn't get ay sort of receipt or anything which I thought was a bit odd, is that normal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Time to pay under the CCA regulations.

"Application for a time order under the Consumer Credit act 1974".1. Ensure you put in financial statement of in and outgoings.2. Make sure NRAM have the correct amount due - very bad at doing this. and 3. keep all your paper work.4. If it is going to take you 20 years to pay, then an IVA is the best route and Payplan or cssc are the best to do it for you. If it on a mortgage, then there are government schemes to keep you in your home and NR should tell you about them.5. Well right to be nervous - NRAM pull out all the guns and use highly paid counsel to cloud the issue for the Judge.6. After win - TTP order extended the time to pay by 3 years, not perfect, but got all the costs for the claimant removed.Never mind about asking me anything. Bcg.Just read your last post : ALWAYS keep a receipt of the court taking your info - just ask them. If it comes to a ttp and you are required to put in a court bundle, then always get a receipt.

.AOLWebSuite .AOLPicturesFullSizeLink { height: 1px; width: 1px; overflow: hidden; } .AOLWebSuite a {color:blue; text-decoration: underline; cursor: pointer} .AOLWebSuite a.hsSig {cursor: default}

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account is not a mortgage, just an unsecured loan. To be honest, I'm not expecting the solicitors to accept the time to pay offer, they seem the type just to litigate no matter what, I can certainly prove at a hearing that the income and expenditure is legitimate and reasonable.

 

I don't really want to go down the IVA route to be frank, I do see it as a last, LAST resort but I guess if NR really push down that road it may be unavoidable, although they would get far less money so I don't see why they would.

 

Anyway, still waiting for their response to my TTP offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greed Chat, if they push for an IVA you may as well go BR, IVA's are no better and will drag on meaning you will end up paying more, so BR will be your trump card if NR (which is our bank) continue to play you for a fool. It won't come to that anyhow.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, yes, it seems you could be right in that have a read, but I seriously doubt it will come to that..

http://www.insolvencyhelpline.co.uk/bankruptcy/disadvantages-of-bankruptcy.php

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I was right, got this through the post this morning...

 

th_NorRockHearing.jpg

 

They have objected to the time-to-pay order. I really don't know what to do next, the hearing is next wednesday which doesn't give me a lot of time to get all my ducks in a row.

 

Does anybody have any advice on what to take to court, what is expected of me, what are the creditors likely to do or say?...any advice at all really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well KEEP CALM.

 

You have your application, how much you owe and your financial statement. Some faith and that is all you need.

 

Do not say too much. Let the Judge do all the talking. Answer his questions simply.

 

If you agree with NRAM how much you owe there should be no problem. The courts have a duty NOT to allow the claimant to over charge on costs - its CPR Objective 1 - go to hms court service online and look it up.

 

NRAM are really difficult, you just have to patiently move forward.

 

Do not let NRAM claim for any costs!! Reply if necessary that your reason for a TTP order is because you want to spend as much money as you can on repaying your debts. Believe me, they will try it on.

 

Even if you do not agree at that moment what the Judge says - let it go - with TTP you can always go back at a later stage. ( DO NOT SIGN A TOMLIN ORDER IF NR ever offer one -)

 

I have my TTP last Friday - I did not agree with all the Judge said, but to appeal is extremely difficult and I always have a chance to return at a later date.. mind you for the moment I am keeping really silent on the subject as the Judge removed £30,000 plus of NRAM costs.

 

I have 5 TTP Orders now, and things should begin to return to normal.

 

Be kind and let me know how you get on. Shalom. Peace.bcg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well KEEP CALM.

 

You have your application, how much you owe and your financial statement. Some faith and that is all you need.

 

Do not say too much. Let the Judge do all the talking. Answer his questions simply.

 

If you agree with NRAM how much you owe there should be no problem. The courts have a duty NOT to allow the claimant to over charge on costs - its CPR Objective 1 - go to hms court service online and look it up.

 

NRAM are really difficult, you just have to patiently move forward.

 

Do not let NRAM claim for any costs!! Reply if necessary that your reason for a TTP order is because you want to spend as much money as you can on repaying your debts. Believe me, they will try it on.

 

Even if you do not agree at that moment what the Judge says - let it go - with TTP you can always go back at a later stage. ( DO NOT SIGN A TOMLIN ORDER IF NR ever offer one -)

 

I have my TTP last Friday - I did not agree with all the Judge said, but to appeal is extremely difficult and I always have a chance to return at a later date.. mind you for the moment I am keeping really silent on the subject as the Judge removed £30,000 plus of NRAM costs.

 

I have 5 TTP Orders now, and things should begin to return to normal.

 

Be kind and let me know how you get on. Shalom. Peace.bcg

 

Ok, thanks for the reply, a couple of questions if I may...

 

I don't think Tomlin orders apply in Scotland but I could be wrong, what are the ramifications of such an order if I'm wrong about not applying here?

 

How do I stop NRAM applying for costs? surely if the judge thinks it's ok to add them I just have to accept it.

 

Do I face questions from NRAM solicitors or is it all through the sheriff?

 

Do I have to bring proof of everything on my i&e sheet? I hope not because I can't. I never kept some receipts, I never even got receipts for things like afterschool clubs etc where I paid cash.

 

PS DO NOT LET NRAM APPLY FOR A CHARGING ORDER ON ANY PROPERTY YOU HAVE.

 

The GOOD thing about the TTP order is that it is not a Judgement, so you will not have a CCJ, although it will show up that you are in arrears on your credit file.

 

Can they apply for a charging order? I thought that only happened if you defaulted on a CCJ.

 

I can honestly say (and I'm not in the slightest bit embarrassed to say this) but I don't give a flying stuff about my credit file. It's a long time dead as far as I'm concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shameless bump.

 

The thing I'm most unsure about is what to take to court. Do I have to bring pages and pages of evidence of income and expenditure or is the fact that I signed the time-to-pay application form as true and accurate enough? Any other hints and tips about what to expect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody help?

 

Please, just a quick piece of advice about what I HAVE to bring to court (if anything). And possibly if someone could help me understand what fair costs are (if any) for NRAM solicitors to claim, how can I fight it?

 

BCG's posts were a help but threw up more questions than answers. :)

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need desperate help, click on the black triangle below and ask one of the site team for some assistance, and they will try and get someone to look in and advise you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I've only just found your thread. I would like to point out that much of the advice given on your thread is incorrect if you're living in Scotland. You are right that a Charging Order is only available for debts registered as CCJ's (e.g. England & Wales).

 

How much debt do you have in total?

How many creditors are there?

How much equity is there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

re the court hearing - please do and try and attend taking a copy of your income and expenditure and any copies of any letters you have sent to try and make an arrangment to pay to show your a willing to pay what you can afford.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I've only just found your thread. I would like to point out that much of the advice given on your thread is incorrect if you're living in Scotland. You are right that a Charging Order is only available for debts registered as CCJ's (e.g. England & Wales).

 

How much debt do you have in total?

How many creditors are there?

How much equity is there?

 

Total debt is just over 20,000

11 creditors (although only 5 of any note, the others are for small amounts.)

Not sure about equity, about 19,000-20,000...maybe, market conditions aren't the best at the moment.

 

re the court hearing - please do and try and attend taking a copy of your income and expenditure and any copies of any letters you have sent to try and make an arrangment to pay to show your a willing to pay what you can afford.

 

Thanks Ida, I suppose I'm worrying over nothing really but as I'm self employed, proving my income is not quite so easy as simply handing over a buch of pay slips. I could show accounts going back to the time I realised I was in fincial difficulties I suppose. I am concerned that the solicitors will start assuming I can start earning more and more, which is unfortunately not realistic.

 

Is it worth bringing letters from other creditors showing they have accepted my payment plans?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update in case anyone is interested.

 

I reached an agreement with the solicitor representing Northern Rock just before the hearing. The same offer that was already on the table before the hearing, the same offer based on the budget sheet I'd brought with me, the same offer on a pro rata basis that the other creditors got, makes you wonder exactly what the point was but hey, there you go.

 

What was an eye opener is how much more formal these hearings are in Scotland, the sheriff is there wig and all, presiding over multiple solicitors, all in their gowns and all in front of a public gallery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be inclined to complain about NR and their time wasting throughout all of this! If you have made the same offer all along, which they have refused all along, then suddenly they take it to this stage and are suddenly accepting of it? Then there is clearly some abuse of process here? It would definitely merit questioning...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...