Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
    • Welcome to posting on CAG cabot, people will be along soon to help you try to sort this out. Please complete this:  
    • Quotes of the day penny mordaunt came out swinging with her broadsword, and promptly decapitated sunak while Nigel Farage, representing Reform UK, made contentious claims about immigration policies, which were swiftly fact-checked during the debate.   Good question though raised at labour about the 2 child benefit cap, which I broadly agree with, but the tory 'trap' assumes tory thinking - rather than child centric thinking. There should be no incentives to have kids as a financial way of life paid for by everyone else ... ... BUT the kids should not be made to suffer for the decisions of their parents Free school meals would feed the kids, improve their ability to learn, and incentivise them to go to school. As an added benefit ... it would invest in our nations future.   How far this should go is a matter for costing, social intent and future path of the nation, but not feeding our nations kids is an abomination. There should be at least one free school meal per day for every child who attends school. Full Stop. Its the cheapest and most effective investment in our future we could make.
    • Hey people, I've been browsing this amazing forum for the past year and recieved a letter today which has made me require some help. Received a claim form from Cabot in the Civil National Business Centre in regards to an Aqua Credit Card taken out in 2018. I failed to make payments due to financial hardship and have not taken out any credit or uses any forms of credit since. Received a lot of letters from Cabot and their solicitors Mortimer Clarke which I've ignored    By an agreement between New Day Ltd RE Aqua& the Defendant on or around 26/03/2018 ('ths Agreement) New Day Ltd RE Aqua agreed to issue Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the named Claimant. Cabot Credit Management Group Limited, acting as servicing agent of the named Claimant through its Appointed Representative (Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited), has arranged for these proceedings to be issued in the name of the Claimant. The named Claimant may be entitled to claim interest under the Agreement but does not seek such interest and instead claims interest under Section 69(1) of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8% p.a.from03/03/2023 until date of issue only, or alternatively such interest as the Court thinks fit THE NAMED CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 3800.82 2. INTEREST OF 379.84 3. Costs How would I go about this and what could happen? I don't remember much details about the card either.
    • cause like you said in post one, 99% of people think these are FINES (it now reads charge). and wet themselves and cough up. they are not, they are speculative invoices because the driver supposedly broke some imaginary contract by driving onto privately owned land which said owner may or may not have signed some 99% fake contract with a private parking co years ago, thats already expired or has not been renewed or annually paid to employ them dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Summons to appear at court for unlicensed vehicle


ohdearme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My car tax expired Nov 09. I forgot to renew it until I realised in February 2010.

 

I then renewed it online but it was only backdated until 1st of Feb, so I was unlicensed for 2 months.

 

In March I received a notification that I'd been caught in Feb driving by one of those dvla roadside cameras and they requested a I pay £110 (or so).

 

It was a particularly stressful time, and I forgot all about it, until this morning when I received a magistrates court summons.

 

I realise it's my own daft fault and should have renewed the tax on time, and should have paid the fine, but it was a stressful time (divorce/child custody issues/money problems) and I'd be having a good day if I could remember my kids names, let alone my car tax.

 

I'm worried about getting a massive fine which I can't afford, can you advise what I should do? please guilty and provide mitigating circumstances? Would a magistrate be lenient?

 

Thanks

 

ohdearme

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the cash to hand, you could always speak to the court and see if you could pay it before the date of the hearing, thus avoiding stress for yourself and also freeing up court time.

 

I am not too sure if they will add additional charges on, but if you are not in a position to pay in full, at least if you go to court you can ask to pay your fine by installments.

 

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there a letter allowing you to plea by post, or are they asking you to attend ?

 

If you can plea by post, then do. The court can deal with it quicker, the costs will be less.

 

Either way, they will ask that you pay the back tax, order you to pay court costs (i think it is either £50 or £75), and they will fine you according to your income. For no tax between 1 and 3 months, it is what is classed as a band A fine, and you will be fined anywhere between £50 and £170 fine depending on your income.

 

They will automatically issue a collections order, but if you cant pay immediately then tell the court. they have the discretion to allow you to pay at a minimum of £5.00 per week if they want to. However, if you dont pay your fines, a warrant will be issued for your arrest

 

Good luck and I hope it goes ok for you x

Any advice I give, is given with the best intention of helping. I am not legally trained, so it is probably best to just ignore me;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there a letter allowing you to plea by post, or are they asking you to attend ?

 

If you can plea by post, then do. The court can deal with it quicker, the costs will be less.

 

Either way, they will ask that you pay the back tax, order you to pay court costs (i think it is either £50 or £75), and they will fine you according to your income. For no tax between 1 and 3 months, it is what is classed as a band A fine, and you will be fined anywhere between £50 and £170 fine depending on your income.

 

They will automatically issue a collections order, but if you cant pay immediately then tell the court. they have the discretion to allow you to pay at a minimum of £5.00 per week if they want to. However, if you dont pay your fines, a warrant will be issued for your arrest

 

Good luck and I hope it goes ok for you x

 

Don't forget to add the £15 "Victims Surcharge" to help fund the Criminal Injuries compensation scheme.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay it, you're admitting guilt as the crooks at the DVLA see it and they'll latch onto you like vulchers. If this fine is for an unlicensed vehicle on the public highway, after you've "admitted" that by paying, there'll be another fine shortly after and another fine a couple of months later for failure to relicense and as much as they can possibly take you for on this and everything possibly associated with it they you may have done. Be a man and defend yourself in court, in truth even if a judge does rule to fine you it will no doubt be for less than the DVLA will try and leach off you so you have nothing to lose. Be optimistic with the judge rulings that the DVLA have been acting unlawfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay it, you're admitting guilt as the crooks at the DVLA see it and they'll latch onto you like vulchers. If this fine is for an unlicensed vehicle on the public highway, after you've "admitted" that by paying, there'll be another fine shortly after and another fine a couple of months later for failure to relicense and as much as they can possibly take you for on this and everything possibly associated with it they you may have done. Be a man and defend yourself in court, in truth even if a judge does rule to fine you it will no doubt be for less than the DVLA will try and leach off you so you have nothing to lose. Be optimistic with the judge rulings that the DVLA have been acting unlawfully.

 

 

Your talking twaddle.

 

Firstly if you plead at the earliest opportunity, the court costs are always less than if you do it later or not at all

 

secondly, there is only one offence on record, and the OP has now got their tax

 

Thirdly, there is no judge, this would be magistrates court

Any advice I give, is given with the best intention of helping. I am not legally trained, so it is probably best to just ignore me;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your talking twaddle.

 

Firstly if you plead at the earliest opportunity, the court costs are always less than if you do it later or not at all

 

secondly, there is only one offence on record, and the OP has now got their tax

 

Thirdly, there is no judge, this would be magistrates court

 

Try to know what you're talking about. The DVLA pull this time and time again and there's stories of it everywhere. It's another one of their scams you receive the first fine for being seen unlicensed on the public highway and think "Oh, only £110..." and pay it. That in their eyes admits guilt so another fine comes along, either for failure to relicense/breaking Sorn/surety whatever and this fine is 3 or more times the last one. Then a couple of months later the next fine turns up and this is for your offence under the many acts they love to quite to and time again, and this one ranges anywhere between £500-£5000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to know what you're talking about. The DVLA pull this time and time again and there's stories of it everywhere. It's another one of their scams you receive the first fine for being seen unlicensed on the public highway and think "Oh, only £110..." and pay it. That in their eyes admits guilt so another fine comes along, either for failure to relicense/breaking Sorn/surety whatever and this fine is 3 or more times the last one. Then a couple of months later the next fine turns up and this is for your offence under the many acts they love to quite to and time again, and this one ranges anywhere between £500-£5000.

 

It's not a [problem], it's all in the Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994.

What the OP is facing if he pleads guilty is:

Keeping or using an unlicensed vehicle on a public road - s.29. (variable fine at court - 1/3 discount for early guilty plea)

An additional liability for the unpaid duty - s.30. (2 months - Dec + Jan)

A Late Licensing Penalty - s.32 (usually £80, reduced to £40 for prompt payment)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a [problem], it's all in the Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994.

 

Just because it is in an Act doesn't mean it's not a [problem]. it just happens to be a legalised one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
If you pay it, you're admitting guilt as the crooks at the DVLA see it and they'll latch onto you like vulchers. If this fine is for an unlicensed vehicle on the public highway, after you've "admitted" that by paying, there'll be another fine shortly after and another fine a couple of months later for failure to relicense and as much as they can possibly take you for on this and everything possibly associated with it they you may have done. Be a man and defend yourself in court, in truth even if a judge does rule to fine you it will no doubt be for less than the DVLA will try and leach off you so you have nothing to lose. Be optimistic with the judge rulings that the DVLA have been acting unlawfully.

 

Absolute rubbish. You clearly do not know what you are talking about in this specific case.

 

The DVLA will have the evidence that the vehicle was on the public highway ie the roadside camera. I would recommend paying the fine before the court date if you are in a financial position to do so. If not you will be able to make an arrangement with the courts to pay the fine in installments.

 

To defend yourself in court you need a defence. If the vehicle was on the public road untaxed that is an offence. Admitting guilt to this oversight and taxing your vehicle after the date in question will not then make you fair game for a a sackfull of other fines!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Here's my quick story: Purchased car this year (lets say on the Saturday) had no log book, mot or car tax. Sent off for the log book ON the Saturday paying £25 fee to DVLA (for a bit of paper).

Insured the car ON the Saturday, Mot the car ON the Monday (pass).

Tuesday went to post office to tax car with relevant paper work, EEEEEEERRRRRRR no can do.

Went on DVLA internet site same night EEEEEEEERRRRRR try again.

Went to DVLA office on the Wednesday only to be told you cant tax YOUR car without the log book... but wait for it......... it will take 6 WEEKS!!!!!

So in the mean time had a car ready to go that i couldn't drive, MESSED UP!

 

6 weeks later gets the log book to tax car, taxed the car for 6 months at £134 losing out on the rest of the month as it was at the end of the month that i taxed.

 

8 weeks later or so gets a letter from DVLA for UNLICENSED car TAX (are you taking the P**S or what!)

 

Letters are exchanged back and forth for 2 weeks or so, now im just waiting for them to summons me to court to which they can kiss my ASS as i wont be pleading guilty to NOTHING!!!

 

You can fine me as much as you want i will go to the papers that i can promised. I am sick to death of F-ING crooked legalized legislation that gives the right to the DVLA take money off harding working TAX paying people!!!

 

Keep posted i will be in touch people!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my quick story: Purchased car this year (lets say on the Saturday) had no log book, mot or car tax.

 

You should have been given the green new keeper supplement (part of the old keeper's V5C) when you bought the car, and used that to licence the car.

 

Raykay, it would seem there was no V5C (logbook) available/supplied at the time of the purchase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Correct CREM there was no Log book/green supplement supplied for me to TAX the car.

 

I have a recent letter from DVLA stating they are going to take me to court. No doubt that i will have a bigger fine than the £92.00 which is imposed at the moment, because thats how the courts operate they will protect the DVLA as it forms part of the government.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...