Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sons Phone Stolen! £500 Worth Of Calls To Romania On A £15 Per Month Contract!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:-x My sons phone was stolen/lost, he doesnt know which. Unfortunately it picked up by someone who preceded to call somewhere in Romania rattling up a £500 bill. T Mobile refuse to refund any of the charges despite it being a £15 per month contract.

Do we have any recourse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that in fact we have crime number for this offence, so it should be considered stolen rather than lost.

Therefore how can T Mobile get away with m aking a profit on a crime, any input would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

The theft was reported after the calls were made ALF, do you think that a £15 permonth contract should be able to rattle a bill of £500 and furthermore why should T Mobile retain the profit from a crime.

I want to know whether this is legal

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably there was no credit limit block on the account?

 

eg, I have a £15 per month contract and a credit limit of £75 (I think - it was £50).

 

I think you may have to push to negotiate with TMob and maybe ask why they allowed the phone to be used to run up that kind of a bill suddenly to overseas calls.

 

Failing that, will your home insurance cover it at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not going to be what you want to hear but you are liable for the call charges, your contract makes this quite clear.

 

You may be able to negotiate a waiver of these charges or a discount from T-Mobile but that will depend on their goodwill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A discount of around 20% to 30% is about all you can expect. T-Mobile are not 'profiting' from crime, as the discount will reflect this - the balance goes to the foreign network who delivered the call, and should get paid for their services.

 

Whether lost or stolen, it doesn;t really matter - he should either protect his interests by using the provided security measures (PIN protection) or in the absence of this, an insurance policy. It is a hard lesson to learn, but a valuable one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably there was no credit limit block on the account?

 

eg, I have a £15 per month contract and a credit limit of £75 (I think - it was £50).

 

I think you may have to push to negotiate with TMob and maybe ask why they allowed the phone to be used to run up that kind of a bill suddenly to overseas calls.

 

Failing that, will your home insurance cover it at all?

 

Just to add, the credit limit is for T-Mobile's benefit, not the customers, and after a few months of being a good payer, the limit will be raised or even removed.

 

You are liable for all calls before you report it to T-Mobile.

 

Keep civil and polite... any discount is going to be down to T-Mobiles goodwill.

 

Remember that this needs to be paid quickly else it will be a negative mark on the credit file of whoever agreed to the contract.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

Thanks very much for everyone's input. In answer to the questions raised:

  • The bill has already been paid by direct debit
  • It was a Sim only contract
  • It did have a credit block but as my son has had the contract for a while and been a good payer the limit was in excess of what calls were made
  • T Mobile have already refused to offer any discount or should I say refund, probably because its already been paid

Any further suggestions welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your options are say nothing and accept T-Mobile's position or you can escalate your complaint within T-Moblile to the highest level possible using their code of practice to guide you, this should be on their website. If you reach deadlock with them then you can seek independent arbitration of your dispute or you can go through the courts.

 

I don't think that you would stand much change of winning either via arbitration or the courts though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your options are say nothing and accept T-Mobile's position or you can escalate your complaint within T-Moblile to the highest level possible using their code of practice to guide you, this should be on their website. If you reach deadlock with them then you can seek independent arbitration of your dispute or you can go through the courts.

 

I don't think that you would stand much change of winning either via arbitration or the courts though.

A point not made here though is that arbitration will cost T-Mobile money. Following their "Code of Practice" and stating that the complaint will go to arbitration may just be the kick up the bum that they need.

 

T Mobile can not justify making any profit whatsoever from this even if it is £20, and that will be the basis of my complaint.

Thanks for you comments

I'm with you that they should not profit. This is why they normally give a little discount in the region that Buzby posted.

 

Just to be a little annoying and pedantic (what moi?:razz:) can I ask is it the sim only 30 day rolling contract or the 12 month one? If it's the 30 day, get your son to get his PAC aswell, The department that deals with that sort of thing commonly have the ability to give discounts etc. (although I feel your son will probably move network anyway given this bill!)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

A point not made here though is that arbitration will cost T-Mobile money. Following their "Code of Practice" and stating that the complaint will go to arbitration may just be the kick up the bum that they need.

 

 

I'm with you that they should not profit. This is why they normally give a little discount in the region that Buzby posted.

 

Just to be a little annoying and pedantic (what moi?:razz:) can I ask is it the sim only 30 day rolling contract or the 12 month one? If it's the 30 day, get your son to get his PAC aswell, The department that deals with that sort of thing commonly have the ability to give discounts etc. (although I feel your son will probably move network anyway given this bill!)

 

Hi loc,

Its a 12 month contract,

OUR PROBLEM IS THAT ITS A LOT MORE DIFFICULT TO NEGOTIATE WITH PEOPLE WHEN THE INVOICE IS PAID:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree BUT at least no-ones credit file is going to get fried!

 

Keep at them, google "t-mobile code of practice" and follow the complaints procedure highlighted there, and make it clear what you would accept as an outcome.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi exasperated,

not much to add but here's some background on how the networks protect themselves.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-3042733.html

 

I find the whole issue of networks continually using these situations to profit from morally indefensible and legally questionable.

 

Very often the loss they claim the customer is liable for only exists on paper.

 

Just out of interest what were the Romanian phone numbers. If they are used to bill for international premium rate services for example then it is very likely T-mobile has lost no money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi exasperated,

not much to add but here's some background on how the networks protect themselves.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-3042733.html

 

I find the whole issue of networks continually using these situations to profit from morally indefensible and legally questionable.

 

Very often the loss they claim the customer is liable for only exists on paper.

 

Just out of interest what were the Romanian phone numbers. If they are used to bill for international premium rate services for example then it is very likely T-mobile has lost no money.

 

Hi GW,

We dont know what the numbers were, however despite the facts that certain procedures were not followed I still maintain and agree with you that it is indefensible that T Mobile retain any profit from what clearly is a crime.

On behalf of my son I am going to take this up fully and will cause as much inconvenience to T Mobile until they concede or we reach a dead end.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the first thing I would do is insist T-mobile supply a fully itemised bill of these calls. dates/durations/costs.

 

It would be interesting to see if the calls were to ordinary Romanian domestic numbers or a premium rate service that was using 'Romanian' numbers to bill to.

 

In other words were the calls being made to a company that T-mobile had a revenue share billing agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be almost impossible to find the companies in the revenue chain if the numbers were international premium billing numbers.

 

this is how some of the numbers start(40 is the Romanian dialling code)

 

 

Romania 3 40.338 VOICE/ADULT

Romania 375 40.3375 VOICE/ADULT

Romania 385 40.3385 VOICE/ADULT

Romania 4 40.312 VOICE/ADULT

 

It's equally likely the numbers on your bill will be numerous unrelated domestic if the thief/thieves were just using it to phone home but it would be interesting to see if the call patterns indicated (AIT) Artificially Inflated Traffic or similar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...