Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

esa medicals


hedid2003
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

after reading some of the other nightmare medicals other people have had for esa.should i just send appeal form now instead of going for my medical tomorrow

or if i do go to medical i could get medical assessor to sign my appeal form.

any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely 100% go to the medical. Do not fail to attend and then appeal.

 

If you turn up and are found fit for work you can appeal the decision and you will continue to receive benefit until the tribunal hears your appeal.

 

If you don't turn up your benefit will stop. Although you can appeal an adverse "failed to attend" decision, you won't be paid ESA while you are waiting for the tribunal. The character of the appeal would be entirely different, too: you'd have to explain why you didn't attend. The subject of your fitness to work wouldn't even enter into it.

 

And, while you might wish to give some thought to what you would say in your appeal form and what documents you might send to support the appeal, don't send an appeal form yet. The JCP appeals section will not accept an appeal against a decision that hasn't yet been made.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've moved this thread to the approprate Forum, could you please post up your question.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely 100% go to the medical. Do not fail to attend and then appeal.

 

If you turn up and are found fit for work you can appeal the decision and you will continue to receive benefit until the tribunal hears your appeal.

 

If you don't turn up your benefit will stop. Although you can appeal an adverse "failed to attend" decision, you won't be paid ESA while you are waiting for the tribunal. The character of the appeal would be entirely different, too: you'd have to explain why you didn't attend. The subject of your fitness to work wouldn't even enter into it.

 

And, while you might wish to give some thought to what you would say in your appeal form and what documents you might send to support the appeal, don't send an appeal form yet. The JCP appeals section will not accept an appeal against a decision that hasn't yet been made.

Thank you

im due to go back into hospital sometime this year i hope,for my ninth operation.where do i stand on them making a decision on my capability to work,as i have no definite date for my op.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two threads merged, hedid2003.

 

Please continue to post here regarding this issue.

 

Many thanks.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you turn up and are found fit for work you can appeal the decision and you will continue to receive benefit until the tribunal hears your appeal.

 

Antone, my hubby's uncle is appealing his ESA medical where he was told he was fit to work but he's not getting any benefit, and his tribunal isnt until November!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Antone, my hubby's uncle is appealing his ESA medical where he was told he was fit to work but he's not getting any benefit, and his tribunal isnt until November!

 

Why not? I mean, if he's on ESA (as opposed to IB) and he showed up for the medical then the rules are quite clear - he should be paid if he's submitted a valid appeal. Is there some other reason why he isn't getting paid? Has he only recently submitted an appeal?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

im due to go back into hospital sometime this year i hope,for my ninth operation.where do i stand on them making a decision on my capability to work,as i have no definite date for my op.

 

The decision on your capability for work should be made within a few weeks of the medical. Being in hospital won't normally affect your benefits unless it's a really long stay, though if you get any premiums they might be affected. It's been a few months since I left the DWP, so I can't recall all the details.

 

If you need medical evidence for the time you are in hospital, ask them to sign form Med 10 and give it to you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how does he live with no money coming in

His wife is on Incapacity Benefit and so is his son things are tight but they are managing.

He was made redundant from his job last september(but to be honest he should've been on the sick then but because his job wasnt too hard and his workmates helped him out he'd carried on working longer than he should)

His doctor has signed him off work (which DWP seem to be ignoring) and he is undergoing tests at various hospitals and is really not well, he's 58 and probably wont work again and at this rate wont live to retire anyway

Sorry for hijacking, rant over :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do get premiums and dla.and worried that while im in hospital having no money coming in plus i dont know how long i will be in hosp,the last op i had was dec09

which was supposed to be approx two wks,because of complications i had another op 8 days later after my first op.so i had 2 ops in dec 09.where it ended up me spending 5wks in hosp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do get premiums and dla.and worried that while im in hospital having no money coming in plus i dont know how long i will be in hosp,the last op i had was dec09

which was supposed to be approx two wks,because of complications i had another op 8 days later after my first op.so i had 2 ops in dec 09.where it ended up me spending 5wks in hosp.

 

Well, I understand that DLA is withdrawn after 4 weeks in hospital. I believe that the underlying entitlement isn't affected, but I never processed DLA so I'm not sure. For ESA, the Severe Disability Premium would be withdrawn when DLA stops (also, the Carer Premium would be withdrawn after 12 weeks if you're getting Carer's Allowance) but your basic entitlement to ESA won't stop.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

why is anything to do with benefits so complicated.This is my first experience being out of work and claiming benefits,to my knowledge all the conversations i have had with dwp i dont think even they know whats going on.i never thought becoming ill was so complex.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

why is anything to do with benefits so complicated.This is my first experience being out of work and claiming benefits,to my knowledge all the conversations i have had with dwp i dont think even they know whats going on.i never thought becoming ill was so complex.

 

It's not that no-one at the DWP knows what's going on, exactly, though that certainly happens. There are problems with internal communications between sections, and this can mean that the people you speak to aren't aware of all the relevant information. First line telephony staff receive very little training, which causes problems too. It's not the fault of those staff, but they're under huge pressure to rattle through 60-odd calls each day, and it's hardly surprising that such a set up results in mistakes being made and incorrect information given to customers.

 

The complexity is arguably unnecessary, and every incoming government promises to simplify the system. They soon find that's easier said than done. There's great political pressure from all sides on this issue: from claimants/customers who feel the government and DWP are trying to deny them legitimate entitlements; all the way through to readers of the Daily Mail who would happily see everyone who claims a benefit thrown in a workhouse and fed water and gruel. Throw in some complaints about "asylum seekers" and you've got a serious political hot potato.

 

These are just personal views based on about 2 years experience as an ESA processor.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

point taken

i know no ones to blame i just wish that they could look at people who are genuinely ill and realise we got a lot going on with health, hosp appts,doctors nurses,etc etc without being bombarded with such complicated paperwork.sorry for the rant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

point taken

i know no ones to blame i just wish that they could look at people who are genuinely ill and realise we got a lot going on with health, hosp appts,doctors nurses,etc etc without being bombarded with such complicated paperwork.sorry for the rant.

 

No need to be sorry. There's no doubt in my mind that the system is too complex. Certainly there is a need to protect taxpayers' money from those who would game the system, but my own feeling is that we should not be starting from the assumption that everyone who claims a benefit is doing that.

 

The government will assure you that they don't make that assumption, and maybe they don't, exactly. But I am as certain as I can be that the complexity, paperwork and so on is designed to passively discourage benefit claims.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possible solution to the esa problem.We both know that there are genuine claims and fraudulent claims.Instead of giving both fraudulent and genuine claims chances to fill in forms,medicals,appeals etc etc.Just ask claimants GP or consultant.save a lot of time and money oh and worry.My consultant would be more than happy to discuss if im fit to work or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

His wife is on Incapacity Benefit and so is his son things are tight but they are managing.

He was made redundant from his job last september(but to be honest he should've been on the sick then but because his job wasnt too hard and his workmates helped him out he'd carried on working longer than he should)

His doctor has signed him off work (which DWP seem to be ignoring) and he is undergoing tests at various hospitals and is really not well, he's 58 and probably wont work again and at this rate wont live to retire anyway

Sorry for hijacking, rant over :-x

 

Have they tried to claim Income Support, the grounds are his wifes IB.

They probably will qualify, unless their capital is over 16k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possible solution to the esa problem.We both know that there are genuine claims and fraudulent claims.Instead of giving both fraudulent and genuine claims chances to fill in forms,medicals,appeals etc etc.Just ask claimants GP or consultant.save a lot of time and money oh and worry.My consultant would be more than happy to discuss if im fit to work or not.

 

While ostensibly reasonable, there is a problem with that approach. There are a great number of people who exert pressure on their GPs to write certificates, turning up at the surgery every week and demanding one even though the GP him/herself doesn't actually believe there's much wrong. I've personally spoken to GPs who've called after being told by a customer that they're "legally obliged" to write a cert.

 

In the end, some GPs just want to get the person out of the surgery so they can deal with the genuinely sick people in the waiting room, so they sign a Med 3 for a few weeks. Next month: lather, rinse, repeat.

 

In the case of consultants/specialists and so on, I'd be more inclined to accept the idea. GPs don't refer people to consultants unless there is a real problem.

 

I realise all of this makes me sound cynical - I think people here on this forum can confirm that I'm not. But I do support having procedures in place to ensure that people who get ESA really need it, and I tend to find that genuine claimants (the vast majority, in my experience) agree with me.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to open a debate that moves away from the OP, I'm not convinced at all about the biased GP theory. I agree there may be a very small percentage of GPs incorrectly issuing medical certificates but if they were dealt with fully and swiftly - ie sacked - then there would be no problem. Certainly, speaking for my local surgery, you will not get a medical certificate unless you actually warrant one.

To be fair, many GPs are absolutely fed up with being treated like idiots by the DWP. In my view, I would much rather trust the word of a REAL medical professional - who has clinically observed me over a number of years - than the view of a 'healthcare professional' who meets me for 20 to 40 minutes and - no offence to the DM - a glorified clerk with little medical understanding.

I honestly do not believe there is a single reason for ATOSH to be involved in assessing people for ESA, DLA or any other sickness related benefit.

Just my view like ... ;)

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to open a debate that moves away from the OP, I'm not convinced at all about the biased GP theory. I agree there may be a very small percentage of GPs incorrectly issuing medical certificates but if they were dealt with fully and swiftly - ie sacked - then there would be no problem. Certainly, speaking for my local surgery, you will not get a medical certificate unless you actually warrant one.

To be fair, many GPs are absolutely fed up with being treated like idiots by the DWP. In my view, I would much rather trust the word of a REAL medical professional - who has clinically observed me over a number of years - than the view of a 'healthcare professional' who meets me for 20 to 40 minutes and - no offence to the DM - a glorified clerk with little medical understanding.

I honestly do not believe there is a single reason for ATOSH to be involved in assessing people for ESA, DLA or any other sickness related benefit.

Just my view like ... ;)

Best wishes

Rae

 

Yeah. I'm not really pushing this as my personal opinion, but it's certainly part of the reason why ESA is not awarded solely on the word of a GP. And in terms of assessing your condition well, yes, of course your GP and specialists would know better than an ATOS staffer and a DM. I have, though, as I said, had conversations with GPs who are fed up issuing certs but feel they have to because the patient is claiming a benefit.

 

But of course, it doesn't make sense to look at it this way. The system is designed, for political reasons, to make it difficult to claim, and any analysis of how the system works has to be seen in these terms. It would certainly make it easier to get benefit, and likely more just as well, if the word of GPs and specialists was accepted. Unfortunately, the purpose of the system is not to make things easy.

 

In some ways, that's why I get a bit upset when people rant about DWP staff. Politicians are the ones who define this stuff, who have set up this complex system and then, in typical cowardly fashion, refused to take responsibility for its failure, or simply pretended the failure never happened. And there, at the front line, are AOs on £16000 a year who get to take the blame.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bless you, Antone, for being so calm, considered and civilised in the face of my pet peeve! :)

GP's who feel 'obliged' to write [un]fit notes for those who don't warrant them really need to reconsider their means of earning a living. At the very least they're aiding and abetting benefit fraud. Trusting GP's and weeding out the corrupt ones would be far more cost effective than employing a third party private company to duplicate work already provided for by the NHS.

But, as you rightly say, that's politics...

Best wishes

Rae

Edited by RaeUK
I dream of £16000 a year! ;) lol
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

 

This is my first post on the forums!

 

If you have an appointment for Pathways that would suggest you are no longer in the Support Group but have been moved into the Work Related Activity Group as a result of your WCA. This means there are a few basic changes to your benefit. Firstly the DWP still recognize that you have a health condition (or LCW) but feel that you should be able to take steps to seek a way back into work or training. That doesn't mean that you will be thrown into the first job that comes along, it just means you will be required to attend a series of mandatory interviews to see how you can be helped into work in the future. Secondly, and more importantly, being in the WRAG means a reduction in your benefit. I believe the standard rate for a single person no savings etc is 91.40. You should receive a letter sooner rather than later explaining all this though. If you'd rather not wait then I'd suggest you ring up as they will most likely have the info on screen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...