Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hopefully I’m able to help someone else out with a future post however this particular subject I’m completely at a loss and ever so anxious regarding! I’ll get the letter out when my police officer husband is asleep to see what the company is whom will be writing to me. I know parking companies now seek compensation so I’m expecting these too as they have advised. 
    • You're welcome. Lots of people aren't sure where to post when they arrive but you'll get used to the forum. HB
    • I’m so sorry for posting in the wrong place and I am so thankful you have replied to me thank you.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our Retail Loss Prevention subforum for further advice. It sounds as if you may get letters from people like DWF solicitors or a company called Retail Loss Prevention but we always recommend to ignore them. If the police weren't called on the day you aren't going to hear from them. Ask us any questions you want to and keep in touch but I don't think this will go anywhere. Best, HB
    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

arc v oh insurance 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks caggers,

Had two missed calls and just answered the phone with same number and she said it was ARC.Would not speak to me,wanted to speak to OH on a personnel matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the gold rule.....

 

NEVER EVER talk to dc's or their tame fake solicitors on the phone.

put it down

 

they have no legal powers

 

hello guests .dx waves

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

just your typical sheep in wolves clothes.

 

quite common.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCAs contacting you in another letterhead is considered unfair practice

 

2 UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES

Communication

2.1 It is unfair to communicate, in whatever form, with consumers in an unclear,

inaccurate or misleading manner

 

c. those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who

they work for, what their role is, what the purpose of the

contact is

 

DCAs using solicitors letterhead is an offence under Fraud Act 2006

 

"Fraud by false representation" is defined by Section 2 of the Act as a case where a person makes "any representation as to fact or law ... express or implied" which they know to be untrue or misleading.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Help....!

Arc has just phoned the oh and have said they are going for a ccj for £104.00.

Only one letter received about outstanding debt and several phone calls about the debt.

The debt is for white goods insurance.

The muppet on the phone called oh a liar and said no payments had been paid...wrong!

1 payment in December £16.00 ish confirmed by bank

1 DD payment in Jan £16.00 ish ditto.

They are collecting on behalf of Legal & Gen

Have no problem in paying but it is their attitude that really p***** oh off.:-x

They talk to you like you've just trod in something.

If i could i'd put hand down the phone and rip his f****** head off!:-x

 

I want to make it as difficult as i possibly can now for these muppets...what should i do?:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a complaint to ARC about the conduct of their staff. Threaten to report them to the OFT and other relevant bodies.

 

They should be able to listen back to the phone call, as most companies record their calls these days.

 

I thought it was against OFT rules to threaten using the courts in this way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never deal with these companies on the phone. To the extent that their staff are trained, they are only skilled in bullying and extracting money without regard to anything else. If they ring again, refuse to go through their security questions.

 

I would write to them setting out your proposals for repayment and make it clear that they need to write back to you. Don't give them any information about your financial circumstances other than stating what the maximum amount is that you can afford to pay.

 

As Uncle Bulgaria has said, it would be a good idea to make a complaint. If they're difficult and really want to go for the throat, send them a Subject Access Request and make it clear that you regard their telephone recording system as a relevant filing system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could. They would just complete the online process and then your OH would receive the court papers. They should however, first of all issue a 'letter before action' saying that they will definately be taking court action, if payment is not received in x no. of days.

 

If they are collecting on behalf of L&G, they would normally need their permission before they proceeded in this way. I am not sure L&G would have authorised them doing so.

 

Another avenue open to you, is to make a complaint to L&G about the behaviour of arc. Would L&G want to be associated with a company that acts in this way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your OH should get a letter from them first, before they did this.

 

What was the story with the white goods Insurance? Did your OH, just stop paying for this, without contacting the Insurers to cancel.

 

If the Insurers have cancelled the cover, your OH can write to them for a full breakdown of the cancellation charges calculation. Your OH could enter into a complaint with L&G about this, just so that the matter is in dispute. Debt companies should stop collection activities, if the debt is subject to a dispute. This would slow them down for a while, if they are told that the debt is now in dispute with L&G.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Unc,

I cancelled the DD by mistake thinking i cancelled something else and never reinstated the DD...we just forgot about it.

As i say we are willing to pay the £104.00 it's just the attitude of these bankers,i just want to be as awkward as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caggers,

Oh received this from ARC - any comments please!

i cca'd them as per template + £1 po and they have used the postal order to knock a pound of the os debt!:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so are you trying to reclaim ppi?

 

dx waves to the 3 guest spies.....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

We took out an insurance cover on one of our white goods but i cancelled the dd by mistake.

We have since gone else where for white good insurance cover because of the issues we have had with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...