Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate the time that has gone into replying. I have read so much about this tonight that hopefully I can be a step ahead.  If I gain a reply from the head office I shall let you guys know. 
    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

arc v oh insurance 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks caggers,

Had two missed calls and just answered the phone with same number and she said it was ARC.Would not speak to me,wanted to speak to OH on a personnel matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the gold rule.....

 

NEVER EVER talk to dc's or their tame fake solicitors on the phone.

put it down

 

they have no legal powers

 

hello guests .dx waves

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

just your typical sheep in wolves clothes.

 

quite common.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCAs contacting you in another letterhead is considered unfair practice

 

2 UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES

Communication

2.1 It is unfair to communicate, in whatever form, with consumers in an unclear,

inaccurate or misleading manner

 

c. those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who

they work for, what their role is, what the purpose of the

contact is

 

DCAs using solicitors letterhead is an offence under Fraud Act 2006

 

"Fraud by false representation" is defined by Section 2 of the Act as a case where a person makes "any representation as to fact or law ... express or implied" which they know to be untrue or misleading.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Help....!

Arc has just phoned the oh and have said they are going for a ccj for £104.00.

Only one letter received about outstanding debt and several phone calls about the debt.

The debt is for white goods insurance.

The muppet on the phone called oh a liar and said no payments had been paid...wrong!

1 payment in December £16.00 ish confirmed by bank

1 DD payment in Jan £16.00 ish ditto.

They are collecting on behalf of Legal & Gen

Have no problem in paying but it is their attitude that really p***** oh off.:-x

They talk to you like you've just trod in something.

If i could i'd put hand down the phone and rip his f****** head off!:-x

 

I want to make it as difficult as i possibly can now for these muppets...what should i do?:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a complaint to ARC about the conduct of their staff. Threaten to report them to the OFT and other relevant bodies.

 

They should be able to listen back to the phone call, as most companies record their calls these days.

 

I thought it was against OFT rules to threaten using the courts in this way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never deal with these companies on the phone. To the extent that their staff are trained, they are only skilled in bullying and extracting money without regard to anything else. If they ring again, refuse to go through their security questions.

 

I would write to them setting out your proposals for repayment and make it clear that they need to write back to you. Don't give them any information about your financial circumstances other than stating what the maximum amount is that you can afford to pay.

 

As Uncle Bulgaria has said, it would be a good idea to make a complaint. If they're difficult and really want to go for the throat, send them a Subject Access Request and make it clear that you regard their telephone recording system as a relevant filing system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could. They would just complete the online process and then your OH would receive the court papers. They should however, first of all issue a 'letter before action' saying that they will definately be taking court action, if payment is not received in x no. of days.

 

If they are collecting on behalf of L&G, they would normally need their permission before they proceeded in this way. I am not sure L&G would have authorised them doing so.

 

Another avenue open to you, is to make a complaint to L&G about the behaviour of arc. Would L&G want to be associated with a company that acts in this way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your OH should get a letter from them first, before they did this.

 

What was the story with the white goods Insurance? Did your OH, just stop paying for this, without contacting the Insurers to cancel.

 

If the Insurers have cancelled the cover, your OH can write to them for a full breakdown of the cancellation charges calculation. Your OH could enter into a complaint with L&G about this, just so that the matter is in dispute. Debt companies should stop collection activities, if the debt is subject to a dispute. This would slow them down for a while, if they are told that the debt is now in dispute with L&G.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Unc,

I cancelled the DD by mistake thinking i cancelled something else and never reinstated the DD...we just forgot about it.

As i say we are willing to pay the £104.00 it's just the attitude of these bankers,i just want to be as awkward as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caggers,

Oh received this from ARC - any comments please!

i cca'd them as per template + £1 po and they have used the postal order to knock a pound of the os debt!:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so are you trying to reclaim ppi?

 

dx waves to the 3 guest spies.....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

We took out an insurance cover on one of our white goods but i cancelled the dd by mistake.

We have since gone else where for white good insurance cover because of the issues we have had with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...