Lowell Financial

[Bookworm]

Well thanks for that each.

 

Have to say that if I find info on here and others are looking for it, I strive to find the link and post it for ease.

 

Feel as though I have been put down by much more experienced people for just asking a question.

 

Dummies guide ......... here I come!

I hope you don't mean us Dotty, because that wasn't the intention!

 

I just find it a lot easier to point to the guide than explaining it all over again every time (which is why I wrote the guide in the 1st place, believe you me, you are not the 1st, nor won't be the last, to ask that or other questions... The site isn't the easiest to navigate), as for t'other one, I don't think he meant to be sarcastic, I think he may just have worked out how to multi-quote at last! :lol:

[Dotty50]

Still looking for the Dummies guide!

 

Still looking for the Dummies guide!

 

[angry cat]

Yes, I know. But as I said, as this isn't HIS/HER origianl thread, then I suggest the place it to keep it on track would be on HIS/HER original thread and therefore your little admonition is also off-track in that respect. Savvy?

 

In other words: This thread has now gone so OT and all over the place that of anyone wants to have an on-topic convo about what they're up to, their thread is really where that info should be. No disrespect to the poster of #186 intended, incidentally. ;-)

 

This thread is about: Lowell Financial, therefore if a member (post #186) has concerns with that particular firm, why should they not post up their experience?

My caution, is just keep on track.

 

Advice: cut out the sarcasm.

 

There are many members on CAG, whose live's have been torn apart by 'unfair' pursual by the Lowell Group.

[Bookworm]

This thread is about: Lowell Financial, therefore if a member (post #186) has concerns with that particular firm, why should they not post up their experience?

I refer you to the forum rules and advice. Look it up.

Edit: since I was there - "1.9 Hijacking: Please don't hijack someone else's thread, no matter how closely their story resembles yours. Start a thread specific to your case - that way it is easier for people to keep track of, and thus offer you better help." (my bold) http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

 

My caution, is just keep on track.

My reply is: not on this thread, it's far too late for that.

 

Advice: cut out the sarcasm.

Advice: Butt out and it won't be an issue.

 

There are many members on CAG, whose live's have been torn apart by 'unfair' pursual by the Lowell Group.

Really? well, blow me, I never knew that. Thanks for letting me know. Wow. To think I might have missed that.

 

Tip: Yeah, that's sarcasm too. As long as you do sanctimonious, I'm afraid that's what you'll get back. ;-)

Edited July 21, 2010 by Bookworm
added link

[angry cat]

by Bookworm:

The site isn't the easiest to navigate

 

Exactly!

[Bookworm]

Still looking for the Dummies guide!

 

Still looking for the Dummies guide!

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

Now go and study, we will be having a test tomorrow!

[enamae]

Still looking for the Dummies guide!

 

Still looking for the Dummies guide!

 

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

enamae

[Dotty50]

Unsubscribing!

[angry cat]

 

My reply is: not on this thread, it's far too late for that.

 

Advice: Butt out and it won't be an issue.

 

Really? well, blow me, I never knew that. Thanks for letting me know. Wow. To think I might have missed that.

 

Tip: Yeah, that's sarcasm too. As long as you do sanctimonious, I'm afraid that's what you'll get back. ;-)

 

Nice!

and all on the world wide web...

[Bookworm]

I know. Terrible. Oh, the shame.

 

Once again:

 

Tip: Yeah, that's sarcasm too. As long as you do sanctimonious, I'm afraid that's what you'll get back.

[Bookworm]

Unsubscribing!

that's explained in the guide too.

[angry cat]

Unsubscribing!

 

I do not blame you, Dotty.

 

Am absolutely shocked, dismayed...!

[Dotty50]

Ok still here!....... curiosity etc!

 

No disrespect to anyone on here but I just feel that there seems to be a bit of oneupmanship and if I had come across this when originally finding Cag it would have put me off completely.

 

We are all here for the same reason aren't we?

[angry cat]

I know. Terrible. Oh, the shame.

 

Once again:

 

Tip: Yeah, that's sarcasm too. As long as you do sanctimonious, I'm afraid that's what you'll get back.

 

I think that you need to take a long hard look at youself, darling...

Bookworm: Sarcastic, Sanctimonous, Tetchy and Argumentative!

[Bookworm]

Meanwhile, whilst AC recovers from her shock and dismay , in the real CAG world, has anyone heard any more from James & Co? Or was this just the flash in the pan one suspected?

[angry cat]

Ok still here!....... curiosity etc!

 

No disrespect to anyone on here but I just feel that there seems to be a bit of oneupmanship and if I had come across this when originally finding Cag it would have put me off completely.

 

We are all here for the same reason aren't we?

 

Yes we are, Dotty!

 

Let us get this tread back on track and don't worry about the multi quotes for now;

your own wordings are fine.

[Dotty50]

Ok I will stay for now.

 

But await my multi quotes!

[angry cat]

Meanwhile, whilst AC recovers from her shock and dismay , in the real CAG world, has anyone heard any more from James & Co? Or was this just the flash in the pan one suspected?

 

Please, cut out the sarcasm!

 

James, as you well know was a non de plume;

James does not exist.

 

If you wish to know as to whether Lowell CRT have posted again, check their statistics.

[Bookworm]

Ok still here!....... curiosity etc!

 

No disrespect to anyone on here but I just feel that there seems to be a bit of oneupmanship and if I had come across this when originally finding Cag it would have put me off completely.

 

We are all here for the same reason aren't we?

supposedly, yes.

 

Unfortunately, as often, there are some people who can not dissociate terribly well. AC's animosity, I'm sorry to say, goes back to a thread in the Bear Garden in which I had the temerity of being leftist, atheist, anti-royalist, anti-thatcherite, Tory-detesting and other things cherished by her, and this is but a potshot racking up old embers. As you can see, she very quickly goes down to plain insults when she can't think of anything else to reply. You get used to it after a while, water of a duck's back as far as I am concerned. ;-)

 

Don't let it worry you, m'dear, remember that in the end, once you close the computer, these people don't exist, real life does. If you need help on your threads, people will help, regardless of their own petty squabbles, and that's the important thing.

 

Think of it of as an extended, huge dysfunctional family gathering at xmas and you'll get the idea.

[Bookworm]

Ok I will stay for now.

 

But await my multi quotes!

sorry, I had logged off for the night then remembered something: at the time, multi-quotes, really meant "multi", then the software was updated and "multi" became "2" and no more. I haven't checked recently, but remember that you may not be able to multi-quote more than 2 quotes in each post.

 

 

 

 

 

(Begging her Ladyship's pardon for going off on a tangent again)

[angry cat]

by Dotty50:

We are all here for the same reason aren't we?

 

Yes, we are.

 

Lowell, were a thorn in my side for over a year.

That is why, I posted up on this particular thread and will continue to do so!

[Dotty50]

Well I have had nothing to do with them, or so I thought.

 

A recent credit file inspection shows a search by them!

 

Now from my experience, didn't the OC/DCA have to have your written confirmation agreeing to any search being done?

[MARTIN3030]

Well folks-the last post from the OP on this came back on the 8th.July.

I quote

 

" Re: Lowell Financial Thank you all so much for your replies, they are a great help.

I think I will send them another letter using the templates on here as a guide, as they don't actually fit my circumstances I will just use relevant points such as OFT guidelines etc, do you think that would be the best thing to do?, I don't really want to answer that post on here from their complaints dept as I doubt that people who work for different depts of the same firm can be helpful, in fact it makes me feel uneasy that one of that lot has been reading my post.

Thanks again, Lou"

 

 

Now for reasons best known to them-(although I think its fair to say,reasons which people will differ to have opinions on)

 

There does not appear to be more forthcoming from the OP on this thread.

 

Most (if not all) of those with their own opinions have expressed them,and its unfortunate that there WAS instances where some posts and comments fell foul of good order and site rules and were seen to be inappropriate to remain.This has been explained tirelessly so I wont dwell on that.

The thread has run its course.

 

Of course theres still questions,still concerns,still conspiracy theories and still paranoia.....but there are those who will never be convinced of CAGS transparicy in dealing with this-and sadly there does not appear to be the evidence which may have helped us to show that-because those users invited to engage have been frightened off from doing so.

 

If the CAG is to be taken seriously by those tasked with regulating the industry,and seeking representation to be a player in future proposals then it makes sense that we should be taking steps to make that a reality.

None of those to my knowledge invove some of those misguided actions we have seen posted of late.

 

 

Thanks for input-thread now closed.

 

 

Edit-If the OP does want to update or request further help,then of course we would like to assist and hear of any progress.

I hope they feel minded to do that,and the intro posts can be incorporated into a new thread.

Edited July 22, 2010 by MARTIN3030