uk cps ltd parking ticket !!

[soforene]

... I would suggest you google 'CPS' though and view with whom they are affiliated.

And which Parking company would we need to google to find out who you are affiliated with?

 

You are nothing but a scaremongering troll attempting to frighten people into paying these ludicrous demands for money and are worried that the greater number of people who are finding forums like these are going to drive your ****** companies out of business (once they find out these so called PCN's are nothing but worthless bits of paper) and hence are resorting to scare tactics in here.

 

Tough luck me old son cus we are on to you !!

 

And the more people that do find out about these racketeers, the less people you and the companies you work for are going to rip off.

 

I suspect a moderator will be along soon to clear the latest "infection".

[ParkLawGuru]

To anyone who belives they can ignore a parking charge on the basis of these suggestions - I wish you the very best o fluke in handling the matter when ou can get to court.

 

However if you are on a low income, or may have trouble dealing with a court case lacking the education and training, let alone solicitor's fees, that are necessary to stand even the slightest chance of winning a case along one of these lines ..... I suggest strongly that you pay the original fine before it gets any bigger.

 

If you have stacks of money in the bank all i can say is I wish you luck in fighting with your loopholes and technicalities - but the loopholes are closing and the number of cases companies like CPS are winning are increasing day by day. I am sure you do not need reminding that HER MAGESTY'S Criminal Prosecution Service uses the initials of CPS, and they do not play games or take on cases that they think they do not have a strong chance of winning.

 

But if you want to fold official letters into airplanes and fly them around the room then I will leave you to do so in the playground. Just don't be surprised when the judge doesn't have the same sense of humour about it.

[bondy lad]

are you excel in disguise i am singing,,,just answer this,,briefly please,,, how many times have these [problematic] won in court,, i suggest you do something usefull,,re commence your medication as ur probably sectionable right now or mr guru,,are you graham white in disguise ?

[ParkLawGuru]

Right, I have done a bit more investigation as to the claims being made in this thread.

 

The WatchDog video is a complete joke. The man Anne Robinson interviews is a very dodgy looking guy and I don't believe he is a very well respected laweyer. It is just his own OPINION, and he got onto the show by saying something that he thought would be a bit controversial he got his 15 minutes of fame. Well done him, bad luck to the people who take his advice. Did you hear the other presenters responses? Annie said 'Right...' in a really disbeleieving tone, and Anita said 'Great legal advice!?' all sarcastic - I am not sure they knew exactly what they were in for as it was broadcast live.

 

I also looked at the court case quoted where a parking company lost - I ALl I can say is that it depends upon the parking company. I agree that person didn't have a very strong case but also the original poster had a bit of luck on the day. The idea of a punitive penalty charge is NOT forbidden by prviate companies as many of you might imagine; clamping companies are permitted to issue some kind of release fee that exceeds the 'actual cost' of doing so and banks write it into the contract that you have to pay overdraft charges which have also been deemed 'fair' in appeal. DId you notice the judge said that the signs could not be ignored? Did you notice the original poster said he "was not sure of the way it would go until the very end" - not quite oh ignore it it will be OK, is it??

 

The situation is closing in I am afraid to say and I advise to pay up as soon as possible to avoid being caught in the net when the gloves come off - 60 pounds will sound like nothing when you are facing charges more like 600!!!

Edited July 3, 2010 by ParkLawGuru

[Snefclarb]

Where did you get the 600 figure from?

[ParkLawGuru]

Ball park - think about it - paying the increased penalties, court costs, your solicitor's costs, charges and costs that they impose on you by the end of the process, etc. These things are not cheap......

Edited July 3, 2010 by ParkLawGuru
change we to they

[SURFBOY]

And you truly belive your parking companies are right do you? Evidenced by the fact that every invoice issued and ignored is chased up through the courts and successfully won by said companies ???? Show me some evidence of this then !

[hanley duck]

Perky, I have a drawer full of PPC invoices. Why haven't I been to court yet?

 

And who is "HER MAGESTY"???

[SURFBOY]

Perklawguru, can i ask, if you are so confident of this then why have there been numerous cases IGNORED totaly and no action whatsoever taken against the IGNORERS?

[kiptower]

Is el'sicko still posting his cr*p , take your medication PERKY and get to bed with your blowup d*ll

 

oh dear trying to imply that CPS are a government agency, now that is a criminal offence upto £5000 and or 3 months inside on a first conviction,

Edited July 3, 2010 by kiptower
darn typo

[SURFBOY]

Oh by the way Perklawguru, have you seen the thread about MINSTER BAYWATCH?

Maybe you should check it out !

[Snefclarb]

paying the increased penalties

 

Oh so you admit they're a penalty? Good stuff. I think we can leave it there.

[ParkLawGuru]

I am NOT going to contribute any further to this thread. I do NOT accept any of the accusations that are being thrown around and simply say you should be more informed before making these sorts of statements. I have spent enough time trying to explain to you why ignoring these documents is not a safe thing to do and if you cannot get this through your head then you can forget my help.

 

Companies LOVE it when you ignore their mail because it makes it easy to prosecute. Which defense are you going on, I didn't see the signs (recent verdict = that doesnt matter), I wasn't the driver (the judge will ask you: well who was then!?), there weren't any losses (this has recently been proven not to apply look at clamping cases).

 

The actions of many parking organizations are watertight unlike i would say your argument.

 

And I used penalties in the loose ("nonlegal") term.....

[GCR]

Always the same with these PPC moron trolls. When their "pay up" claptrap is challenged they head for the hills, like the cowards that they are. PerkLawGrunt is the latest and it has to be said rather hopeless variation of a tired and boring theme.

 

The simple fact is that a very small number of cases are taken every year and all properly defended cases are lost by the PPCs (one company OPC has lost so many recent cases it is heading for the Guinness Book of Records) . Taking cases to court is simply not a valid business which is why all the bigger PPCs do not do it. Also because they do not have a legal leg to stand on and they know it.

 

The PPC "industry" depends on lies and threats and deception. There have been a small number of "thrown" cases which appear to have been set up by a pipsqueak PPC boss in an effort to confuse people that these begging letters have any legitimacy and only that misguided individual thinks that they mean anything.

[kiptower]

dont it come out with total rubbish

 

you dont prosecute in a civil court

 

regardless of what you want to call it quote > penalties in the loose ("nonlegal") term.....

 

losses are not £80 etc nothing even like it

 

as for ignoring the [problem] invoices , its a legal right to ignore them

 

its time for you to PUT UP OR SHUT UP

lets see what LAW's of the land you base all this clap trap on , QUOTE THEM

 

or it must be son OF PERKY or some other brainless / brainwashed , failed to get a job @ McDee's who got a job with a silly uniform a pad of worthless [problem] invoice and a pen , and now thinks he is a policeman, I blame his parents for his failed education , but then he is still trying to find his dad among his many uncle's

 

or some 14 year old spotty oik playing under the bedclothers with his laptop among other things

[B & T]

The guys totally 'lost it' if indeed he ever had it in the first place. What a plonker.

[DBC]

 

The WatchDog video is a complete joke. The man Anne Robinson interviews is a very dodgy looking guy and I don't believe he is a very well respected laweyer. It is just his own OPINION, and he got onto the show by saying something that he thought would be a bit controversial he got his 15 minutes of fame. Well done him, bad luck to the people who take his advice. Did you hear the other presenters responses? Annie said 'Right...' in a really disbeleieving tone, and Anita said 'Great legal advice!?' all sarcastic - I am not sure they knew exactly what they were in for as it was broadcast live.

 

 

Not respected? Just take a look at his profile. Once again you are talking out of the wrong part of your body.

[GCR]

The man Anne Robinson interviews is a very dodgy looking guy

 

as opposed to...

 

Dating Midlands Looplotty (male/36)1973 > Male seeking Female > , > Free UK Dating on Flirtbox.co.uk

 

Any action there, old Perks?

[letshelp]

Oh no, missed him again. Could not post any earlier for laughing so much at Perkylawguru posts.

Now we have all been told, 'the loopholes are closing' I suppose we shall have to change the default advice to pay all that the ppc asks.

Please MODS, don't ban him, is shows everyone how stupid the ppc people really are.

regards

[lamma]

Didn't Perky challenge the pepipoo crowd and then run a mile when they said yes lets go for it ? All gas and no guts. I still smell the Perky coughing. "loopholes" is a very strange way to describe contract law and long established case law. Well he's off back to his own planet now so who cares what he has to say.

[ParkLawGuru]

To those operating under the delusion they can ignore these tickets I quote advice by respected user Bernie_the_Bolt. This is consistent with the advice given by letshelp earlier in this thread.

 

As you will see Bernie too talks about the RISKS of ignoring these notices, just as I have done. I hope this helps you to see that I am not talking rubbish.

 

Since I drafted these templates, life and experience has moved on.

Much of the advice given now is to ignore completely all correspondence from PPCs.

 

My only slight reservation about this is that in the remote possibility of a case being argued in court, would a failure to respond be presented by the claimant and accepted by the court as the actions of an unreasonable person? Would this then count against you?

 

It really comes down to how you, personally, see the risk and whether you are prepared to run the risk.

 

If you are not comfortable to ignore all communications and are not happy with running the risk I outlined above then the templates are possibly for you.

[DBC]

So ParkLawGuru what legal training have you had? And what Parking company do you work for? Two very simple questions which you should be able to answer.

[DBC]

Answer came there none from ParkLawGuru

[B & T]

I am one of countless thousands who have & do 'operate under the delusion they can ignore these tickets' & quite succesfully if I may say so.

 

Nowhere but nowhere does BtB remotely suggest paying these [problematic].

The troll is merely twisting advice given to unnerve those with a weaker disposition.

 

Ignore if you can, write if you must, but never never ever pay these leeches.

[kiptower]

bye bye PLG I hear your off now

 

10, 9, 8, 7, .............................

 

good ridance to yet another TROLL