Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

wink bingo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

i am a member of wink bingo and on 6/6/10 i won £300.02. i made a withdrawal but had still not recieved the money in my account.

 

i logged into live chat an hour ago and was told that the money had been paid to an account with a bank that i no longer use. they apparantly paid it into that account simply because they chose to. i had the debit card as a registered card but when i changed banks i just registered the new card and have been funding from that card for the last 7/8 months. the T&C say that they will pay into account that is funded from. i argued the point that they should have paid into the account i had used to win the £300+ but they say they didnt have to and its my fault for not asking them to delete the old card. i asked where in T&C it says you must tell them to do this and i was told it was a matter of logic and they expected people to know this. obviously i am an idiot because i genuinely didnt realise they wouldnt use the card i have been using for months.

 

the problem i have now is that the money has gone into an account that was closed by barclays for being £500 overdrawn. i had letter from them saying i can no longer use the account. wink bingo are saying that the money was recieved by barclays. there is no way barclays are going to give me the money back!

 

do i have a leg to stand on? more annoyed at wink staff tellin me to have a good day when i had just explained how upset i was!

 

many thanks for taking time to read

meecha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff :)

 

the debit card they paid to was cancelled at least a yr ago when i lost it. i was issued another card with completely different number but Wink are saying Barclays have accepted the money. am not sure if this means it has just gone into the account regardless of debit card number. also not sure how Barclays have accepted money into an account which has been officially closed. but well..... we are talking about barclays lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Barclays account you refer will be closed, but still extant. Unless you told Wink that the card was no longer in use, then their terms and conditions does allow them to place deposits into it.

 

Payments to credit / debit cards will be credited to cards previously used to fund bingo accounts

 

As you are allowed up to 5 cards, unless that card actually expires, they won't be aware that it has been cancelled and no longer in use unless you tell them.

 

If there is an outstanding balance on the account, the issuing bank will naturally accept payments into that account and you should ask them for a statement to confirm that the £300 payment has in fact been credited to it.

 

If the Barclays statement doesn't show a credit of £300, then you should copy that statement to Wink.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two issues here. Firms like these (and even PayPal) are advised of your Bank Accout details and your card number. They cannot TAKE payments from a bank account (unless they have a direct debit) but get round this by using your card details. To pay back winnings, they cannot credit the card, only the bank account - and it is a straightforward BACS transfer.

 

By changing banks, you needed to advise them of the NEW account number, not simply your new card but the account details it was connected to for BACS payments. In the situation you describe, only giving them the new card number would result in what actually happened, they can take from the card number they hold, but when crediting, will do so to the account you advised them of. (There are times when cards DO change, but bank accounts still remain the same).

 

The fact you moved the account becasue you left your old bank is not an issue for them. They paid in good faith to the account whose details you provided. Their obligation to you has been discharged. If this turns out to be incorrect, you need to go to the bank who recieved the funds and ask them to give it to you. If they don't your action would be against the bank, not the bingo firm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...