Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help please dont know what to do


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

im hoping someone can help me here please as i dont know what to do,

i have had a letter today off of a debt recovery agency saying that they are going to seek enforcement of an order that was made in the county court for over £500 for an outstanding vet bill, i have no knowledge of this as every vet bill ive ever had ive paid and it turns out this county court judgement is going back 10 years i never received any correspondence from any vets saying i owed anything and never received anything from the court at the time, what should i do as i havnt a clue and its the first i have heard of it??

they have a case number regarding the judgement and the court details on the letter. we have lived in the same house for 15 years so its not like they didnt know where we were, how would you go on about this??

also how can i defend something that was 10 years ago as obviously all the receipts etc are long shredded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry you are in good hands here I cannot see any court in the land enforcing this, it is statued barred anyway, just ignore them. Have you checked your CRA file recently.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want you can send this letter to prove what the debt is for

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

See what you get back, but do not worry at all, come back to the thread when you get a reply.

It is just annoying but defo nothing to worry about

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sirs I acknowledge receipt of your letter threatening enforcement of a County Court order which you allege was made against me on xx/xx/xxxx.

 

I have no knowledge of any such order ever being made against me and I draw your attention to the fact that you have provided me with no evidence any such judgment exists.

 

I therefore can neither admit or deny any liabilty under this order whatever you might allege.

 

I draw your attention to Section 24 of The Limitation Act 1980 which I reproduce for your convenience in its entirey herein:

 

Limitation Act 1980

24 Time limit for actions to enforce judgments

 

(1)An action shall not be brought upon any judgment after the expiration of six years from the date on which the judgment became enforceable.

 

(2)No arrears of interest in respect of any judgment debt shall be recovered after the expiration of six years from the date on which the interest became due.

 

I state hereby that no action has been brought against me in respect of this alleged County Court Judgement within the relevant limitation period and that I have neither acknowledged nor made any payment against this judgment within the relevant period, I hereby also state that as a result any action under this judgment is permanently forbidden under the above statute and that I have no intention of making any payment against the amount claimed whatever my original liability.

 

In the event you attempt to instigate any legal proceedings for the enforcement of this judgment or attempt and/or succeed in selling this account on to a third party without making them aware of this claim herein that any debt is neither acknowledged or denied but that any alleged debt under this judgment is Statute barred by the virtue of Sec 24 Limitations Act 1980 you may find yourselves not only the recipient of a stoutly defended claim but also the subject of litigation for damages against myself without further notice.

 

A copy of this letter serving you notice is sufficient proof that you have been made aware of both that fact and the fact I do not intend to make any payment on a voluntary basis whatever my original liabilty under this judgment might be proven to be.

 

Yours....

Edited by Jasper1965

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fairly sure too mach time has past. A CCJ never becomes statute barred but the OC/DCA would have to have an extremely good reason as to why it was never enforced at the time, or indeed many years sooner.

 

:oops:Wrong choice of words but its as good as because no judge will enforce it anyway

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been said above, if there is a CCJ, it will not become statute barred.

 

I don't see any problem with enforcing a CCJ of any age.

 

You should consider having the judgment setaside. Normally this would be difficult after such a long time but I think that you may have an argument to make by saying that as the enforcement is so late, it might be exceptionally be possible to have the judgment setaside too.

 

However, I think that you would have to agree not then to try and rely on the expiry of the debt in order to frustrate a future claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I may add here....have you moved house since that time ? I would agree with Bankfodder that the debt does not become statute barred but the emphasis is heavily placed on the creditor to explain why the debt hadn't been collected for so long....I haven't yet seen a judge allow enforcement on a CCJ after 6 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I may add here....have you moved house since that time ? I would agree with Bankfodder that the debt does not become statute barred but the emphasis is heavily placed on the creditor to explain why the debt hadn't been collected for so long....I haven't yet seen a judge allow enforcement on a CCJ after 6 years.

 

no we have lived in the same house for over 15 years and havnt received any correspondence from any court or vets in that time

Link to post
Share on other sites

just received this response back from them from the above letter templates that were sent

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

 

 

Dear xxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

xxxxxxx VETERINARY GROUP & xxxxxxx

IN THE xxxxxxxx COUNTY COURT

 

CLAIM NO.: xxxxxxxx

 

JUDGMENT DEBT & COSTS: £501.50

 

 

 

Thank you for your recent emails in which you set out your views and in which you quote guidelines and a statute, the latter being the Limitation Act 1980. Although we have noted your comments, proceedings were issued and judgment entered under the above claim number.

 

 

 

We discussed the judgment with the Judgment Creditor before writing to you. Indeed, we have also duly conveyed to them the contents of your emails.

 

 

 

A judgment creditor is entitled to enforce a judgment after the six year period with the permission of the court, indeed our letter explained that such an application may be sought. To date, an application has not been filed.

 

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

xxxxxxx & CO

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are basically saying that they have to go back to court, if they wanted to pursue this. As has been said already, this does not seem likely, so they have lost the chance.

 

Looks like you can sit and ignore, until they try to go back to court, which if they do, you should receive some paperwork from the court, so you can submit your side of the story.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...