Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC/Restons Claimform - Marbles now Beneficial Credit card - panicked and paid restons one figure - they want more !! _d judge ordered a STAY, now SJ


eastender100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You can sign but just put 2 horizontal lines through it, even better sign with a different sig. and still put 2 lines through it, or put 2 1p postage stamps and sign them so you will see queens head on any attempt to lift signature. I don't think it is a good idea to tell someone that the DCA involved will use Photoshop that will cause problems for this great site.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Cartaphilus

Also, if you can, take a picture of your signature - re two lines through it - on the document or scan it before sending (but probably best to wait for the site team to come back to you as well with any solution(s)).

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

But do I have to sign it legally?

 

Here is the letter they sent back.

 

Please find enclosed a draft letter which purports to come from you but which is unsigned.

 

You will apprediate that we must ensure we are correspnding with the correct person and that anyone requesting information is entitlled to receive it.

 

Please ensure that all documentation is signed failing which we will not acknowledge receipt nor provide any response.

 

Also they sent me the cca request letter back plus the cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have already issued you with a court summons?

 

What is the alleged debt for, and how much?

If they have issued you with a summons then you will need to respond to this which you can do online, you should always put in a defence, even if you know you owe this money.

 

If they have issued court papers, then a CCA is somewhat late, although they will need to provide the court with a legally enforceable one, which is why you must defend it.

 

What you should do is send them a request under CPR 31.14 and get them to show you exactly what they are going to take to court in order to recover the money.

 

Everything MUST be sent via recorded delivery and whilst it is still debatable IMO I would not sign any correspondence as their is no requirement for any of your requests in writing to have your signature on.

 

They often use the 'we need your signature' trick as a very transparent delaying tactic, as said there is no requirement for this, the time to ascertain whether they were corresponding with the right person was before they sent their first threat letter, not weeks after, when they have already sent private confidential and sensitive information to you, when they admit they don't really know who you are!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know someone signed for it there end as I have the digital signiture. Also how can they say they haven't received it when there asking for the signiture?

 

They will probably claim the postman delivered to the wrong address and it was someone there who signed for it. But that claim will fall flat because, as you say, they sent the cheque back to you.

]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if you can, take a picture of your signature - re two lines through it - on the document or scan it before sending (but probably best to wait for the site team to come back to you as well with any solution(s)).

 

There is NO LEGAL requirement for a signature, they should have ensured they were talking to the right person before sending confidential information to them. It is merely a very immature stalling tactic, besides even I can remove crosses or lines from a signature to use on a document.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is for a credit card which they said they would settle the debt for £...... which I paid. I have this in writing. but it is quite complicated as they changed their minds before I paid it so they are taking me to court for the full amount.

I have a solicitor doing a defence for me.

 

Sorry don't want to give to much info as I have heard they look on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is for a credit card which they said they would settle the debt for £...... which I paid. I have this in writing. but it is quite complicated as they changed there minds before I paid it so they are taking me to court for the full amount. I have a solicitor doing a defense for me.

 

Well in that case if you have the evidence in writing that they will accept a %of the total amount, which you paid, and now they are taking you to court, there is no case to answer, they are the ones who are in breach here, you have kept to your side of the bargain, they have failed.

 

You should, If your Sols is any good be able to claim damages and compo from this outfit, if they have put any adverse markers on your Credit Ref File, then that is a Grand per incorrect entry!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have seen the posted, my solicitor is doing a defence for me and said this would get me extra time.

 

Like i said its complicated, I want to put the full situation on here but worried in case they see it.

Getting paranoid.

 

I agreed to pay a full and final settlement of the account. Got the money together.

They changed their mind and said they wanted more ( within a day) and I paid them the agreed amount (which I have in writing) anyway.

 

I have already paid them over £4000

 

So now do I wait and send them the 2nd letter when there time is up, or resend cca request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I would simply let your Sols deal with it. By all means send them the 'Failed' letter after the allotted time has expired, but IMO I fail to see how they have even managed to get this before a court, least of all request the remaining balance:-|

 

If you Sols are any good they will get this struck out at the earliest, and without you ever having to put in an appearence at court. As I previously said, you seem to be holding all the aces, a letter stating that they will accept a reduced amount in full and final settlement, a receipt or bank statement showing you paid this, and then a letter stating their greed that they now want the full amount.

 

Seriously I would be willing them to take me to court over this, and I would be suing them for damages also.

 

If your Sols don't get you damages and this pathetic waste of time overturned then they are not worth the money you are spending.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now do I wait and send them the 2nd letter when there time is up, or resend cca request?

 

You only ever need send ONE CCA request, as long as you have proof of this then any other low life that buys the lemon can be told to foxtrot oscar, as the account is already in dispute with the first batch of morons.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand?

 

To issue you with a court summons as far as I know, this cannot be done on-line??

 

A court summons issued is normally sent from the court, normally on blue paper, to the alleged debtor when a claimant (original creditor) begins legal proceedings.

 

You are then given 14 days in which to acknowledge receipt, either by 'Admission' a 'Defence & Counterclaim' or an 'Acknowledgement of service'.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi eastender, so you received a claim form in the post, from CCBC in Northampton. If so, you could "log in" to the website, and check what stage the case is at. You can also file any defence online, although there is a word limit.

 

You have decided to retain a solicitor to act on your behalf. If that is the case, your solicitor should be all-to-aware of CPR 31.14. If they are worth their salt, this request will have been done already, and you would be awaiting the claimants response. Your solicitor is supposed to keep you informed. Is this claim over 5k?

 

As previously stated, a CCA request at this stage is likely to be too late. Even a request under CPR 18 would take too long, so CPR 31.14 is the one you need.

 

You really should call your solicitor and ask exactly what s/he is doing about this claim.

 

You made a payment in full and final settlement, exactly how long after receiving that sum did your creditor inform you that this was no longer a F&F settlement?

(OK found it, "within a day". In which case you have the option to DEMAND the return of that payment.)

 

Was the payment made by your own personal cheque?

Edited by Bill Shidding
Link to post
Share on other sites

eastender, if you have a solicitor acting on your behalf then he should have written to the opposition for information already. You dont need to do anything.. which is why you are paying them ?

 

You should start a new thread for each creditor.

 

I do appreciate your concerns, but unless you give us all relevant information then we are unable to help. We are unable to give advice privately.

 

You just need to be as vague as possible. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

don't know if you will see this now but thanks for giving me some help,

 

My other half paid them by direct bank transfer into their bank account.

 

I will contact my solicitor tomorrow and ask what they are doing. i cant check online because they have the court papers.

 

and yes it is over 5k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi eastender,

 

Hi Bill, don't know if you will see this now but thanks for giving me some help, My other half paid them by direct bank transfer into there bank account

 

No problem on helping, thats why CAG is here!

 

I recommend you read this thread (posts 6 to 9)-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/242569-getting-rid-dcas.html

 

This will help if there was an ongoing dispute at the time (ie excess charges/no agreement etc).

Ensure your solicitor gets a copy of the judgment, as that may give you a new angle.

 

Bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I need some advice on Restons as I have asked them for cca request but they have refused all times even when I have sent default letter due to no signiture. I have sent them another letter ( as they are taking me to court) they still say they want a signiture from me as they say i could be anyone. Do you think they have the credit agreement, or are they just stalling? The first request was sent ages ago. If anyone could give me some advice it would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...