Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak must be using GBNOTnews financial planners .. GB News losses up 38% to £42.4m giving channel total deficit of £76m since launch Losses in the latest accounting period were six times greater than revenue.   Mind you, as it seems to clearly be a disinformation service and route of money to poopy MPs and hangers on ... I'm sure they dont mind (mm is that the 'Tory guv or GBNews I'm talking about?.)   GB News owner pumps in further £41mn in funding as losses widen WWW.FT.COM Vehicle backed by hedge fund tycoon Paul Marshall steps in as right-leaning broadcaster increases number of staff   GB News losses grew 38% to £42.4m in 2023 financial year - Press Gazette PRESSGAZETTE.CO.UK GB News' operating losses grew 38% to £42.4m in the year to May 2023, the business has reported in its latest Companies House...  
    • United Kingdom Debt Clock: British National Debt Grow By The Second - Commodity.com COMMODITY.COM Want to know why the UK's national debt-to-GDP ratio is increasing so rapidly? See our overview of the UK national debt and GDP figures.   The tories borrowing last year alone was " £1,780 per head of the UK’s population"
    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice Needed Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Andy, I kept the envelope, but it has no date stamp..they are sending them via franked mail.. unless there is a way to tell the date that I dont know about

 

..but i'm unsure how to do that also the default letter coming after litigation is started..that must be wrong..Absolutley thats the basis of your defence

Im sure one of the Caggers can break the code re date on frank

Ill get you something to put in other back shortly

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Edit to suit and include DN received after litigation commenced

 

 

 

The Claimants are deliberately frustrating these proceedings and preventing me from submitting a Defence/ Counter-claim, by refusing to provide information first requested under a Subject access requestlink3.gif on the xxth xxxxx 2008. They have only partially complied with my request. I have sent letters to the Claimants Solicitors on the xxth xxxxx respsectively, requesting the outstanding information, which has to date not been furnished. I believe this is entirely unreasonable behaviour.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, Ive put this together for the more info part..

 

The Claimants are deliberately frustrating these proceedings and preventing me from submitting a Defence, by refusing to provide information first requested under CPR31 on the 6th XXXX 2009.

 

The Claimants Solicitors acknowledged the CPR31 request on the XXth XXXX 2009, and requested an aditional 14 days to provide the requested documentation,

to date the requested information has not been furnished.

The Claimants solicitor has since sent me a Default Notice Dated 1st XXXX 2010 which I received on 7th XXXX 2010, even though litigation is in progress.

I believe this is entirely unreasonable behaviour.

 

 

what do you think? do I need more?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, Ive put this together for the more info part..

 

The Claimants are deliberately frustrating these proceedings and preventing me from submitting a Defence, by refusing to provide information first requested under CPR31 on the 6th XXXX 2009.

 

The Claimants Solicitors acknowledged the CPR31 request on the XXth XXXX 2009, and requested an additional 14 days to provide the requested documentation,

to date the requested information has not been furnished.

The Claimants solicitor has since sent me a Default Notice Dated 1st XXXX 2010 which I received on 7th XXXX 2010, even though litigation has commenced and therefore invalid and unlawful termination of any alleged debt.

I believe this is entirely unreasonable behavior and the claim as been brought unlawfully

 

 

what do you think? do I need more?

Good to go now Johnny

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Johnny you state that you have requested this in your CPR.You can mention they are in default of your CCA request.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats ok Johnny if you can post details of theirs that will give us a heads up

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No but the normal practice is to exchange AQs

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to be a pest Andy..

 

just noticed that on their N150 part C pre action protocols they have checked yes in the box on part 2 which says:

"have you exchanged information and/or documents (evidence) with the other party in order to assist in settling the claim?"

they have not sent me anything except this AQ...and the illegal DN of course..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you will you use to their lies just make a note.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Andy, just a quick update...

local Court ordered the Claimant to supply the requested info that I requested under cpr31 by last monday....they failed..

also ordered that I submit my deffence by 2 weeks later..

just working on that now..but dont know where to start..

any ideas?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Johnny I trust you are well.

 

Ok if they have failed to comply with the DJs order dated xxxx then you are not in a position to submit an amended defence because nothing as been furnished to change the claimants plea.If anything you should contact the Court and point to the order and date and request a strike out of the Claimants case.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they may but if they cant supply now after paying the summons fee why bother again,they may well sell to another bunch of Muppet's but then again they will have to supply all paperwork their claim is based on also and so it goes on and on ......... very futile.

 

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont let it stress you Johnny play their game;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Andy,

 

Hope you are well..

Just a quick update..

 

the DJ made an order that the DCA produce documents to me by a date..they failed so 3 days later I wrote to the CC to say I couldnt comply with their order because the DCA had failed to provide the info..

2 days later the DCA sent the info that I requested..

The DJ has since made an order that they provide the info by another date or their case will be struck out..

What now?

the info looks like a fabrication anyway..

can I still make a counter claim at this stage?

I'm going to claim for stress

 

Johnny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Johnny

 

Yes im very well thanks

 

Is the court aware that the DCA furnished said information and what if any other docs are you waiting on?

Did the DJ make the order unaware that they have partially compiled?

If so and they have not furnished all requested then wait for the date of the order and contact your CC and prompt his last order.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, apparantly he made the order before the DCA sent the info..

anyway the DCA sent me a DN while litigation is in progress and sent it in an un dated envelope giving me 14 days to pay the arrears..it was dated the 1st and received on the 7th but with no date stamp how will I prove that?

also..in the info that they sent..there is a photo copy of a DN dated about 1 month before the one I have, and both have the total amount stated in the claim form..

they have also registered a default on my credit file..and the amount has increased.

 

Johnny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, apparently he made the order before the DCA sent the info..:( Shame

anyway the DCA sent me a DN while litigation is in progress and sent it in an un dated envelope giving me 14 days to pay the arrears..it was dated the 1st and received on the 7th but with no date stamp how will I prove that? Did it allow 14 days plus service to rectify any alleged breach?

also..in the info that they sent..there is a photo copy of a DN dated about 1 month before the one I have,:D and both have the total amount stated in the claim form.. Only the mthly arrears can be requested by the breach as the Account as not been terminated

they have also registered a default on my credit file..and the amount has increased.Dont worry about that for now you can rectify later if you successfully dispatch the above

 

Johnny

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...