Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fairfax Solicitors/Eversheds & Dept.Work & pensions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5059 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently been involved in challenging Fairfax Solicitors Of Leeds for my daughter over a DWP overpayment from over 10 years ago.

She had no contact with the DWP over this for 8 years and no legal demand for payment or court action had been taken.

The letters received from Fairfax were to say the least amateurish and often contained mistakes in terminology and did not answer any of the questions aked.

I finally challenged them when court action was threatened which I believed was not possible as I had checked back carefully and found the debt to statute barred.

When they replied at first they only stated that Government debt cannot be written off.

I then lodged a formal complaint to Fairfax as they continued to demand a full disclosures of my daughters income and expenditure quoting court guidelines.

At last a reply stating debt is statute barred and legal action is not possible,debt to be referred back to DWP.

Letter received from DWP debt management threatening further action or referral to an outside debt collector.

Formal complaint on this sen to DWP, latest letter from them acknowledging matter sent to ''customer services'' for investigation.

One last big question remains, WHY IS A GOVERNMENT DEPT. USING THE LIKES OF FAIRFAX WHICH BY ANY OTHER NAME IS THE DISREPUTABLE EVERSHEDS ONCE CRITICALLY BLASTED IN A PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because like all Government departments they are cheap, DWP are horrendous, and rarely admit being at fault, having dealt with them personally over an error on their part which would have put me at a loss, the only time they ever sat up and took notice was when I sent them all the dates I wold be available to attend court, and the name of my barrister.

 

The DWP like to believe they are whiter than white, a gentle nudge in the direction of your local MP normaly gives them the kick they need.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying desperate measures in desperate times!!

 

Incidentally, I think I am right in saying that if ever your daughter claimed certain Benefits in the future they may stop some of that money to re-coup the overpayment. Not sure this is covered by credit regulations and as such cannot be time-barred.

 

If I am wrong, then hopefully someone with the correct info will be along soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Harrassed Senior you are correct but this is the only way the corrupt government we are now about to be rid of can recover any debt which is stat barred.

Even if they have a court judgement the 6 year rule can apply they would have to ask leave of the court to pursue.If however you never have to have a social security benefit they can whistle, great as most over payments by the DWP

are their own mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree entirely, I have, in the past, been hit myself by this no-nonsense 'rule' I mean, fair enough if you have had and spent an 'overpayment' but how they can then recoup this out of the poverty line payments you get is beyond me.

 

For instance, my sister is on State Pension which is a few and I mean a few pounds higher because of her working contributions, however, it is low enough for her to qualify for Pension Credit, but now the tax man wants over £1000 per year in tax from her. They cannot comprehend that that will take her £1000 below the poverty level over 12 months!! So as usual give with one hand and take back double with the other!!

 

Sorry I could not give you more help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has your sister income other than State Pension eg investments/savings that are paying interest, and does this exceed her tax allowances please consult man expert on this as soon as pos.

don't get ripped off by gov.by ignorance of your rights the now defunct Lab gov

has relied on this to rip off for years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an anomaly, although a debt to the DWP becomes Statute Barred after six years (five in Scotland) as in all cases of debt the debt does still exist morally although it cannot be enforced legally after that time. However the DWP can still collect the arrears from future benefit payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly what I said but do not give in to threats from DWP they can only recover from benefits and you can appeal amount deducted.

You must be left with the amount THE LAW says you need to live.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reats

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig

 

She is disabled and had been unable to work through disability ten years prior to reaching 60. She has no savings, property, etc. She did not pay tax during that 10 years, and the Inland Revenue only jumped on the bandwagon when she took her pension in a lump sum - they took one third of the lump sum in tax - knocked her sideways did that. Then nothing for 2 years, then got a letter to say she had not returned her recent tax returns, and followed with demands for £3000 for 3 years since her 60th birthday. She says she will go to prison rather than pay it, and, knowing her that is exactly what she will do.

 

Oh well, shouldn't have hi-jacked your thread but thanks for the interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Senior,

I sympathise with your situation I think you and your sister need to consult either a solicitor or an INDEPENDENT financial adviser or the CAB on this one

I thought lump sums from pensions are tax free.

I am no expert on tax matters but please seek the proper advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi brigjac,

 

Just thought I would share info gained from Tax office recently. My daughter is 13 and is receiving a very very very small monthly pension until she is 18 through my late husbands work pension. Income tax was taken off this under the code BR cumulative and when I queried it, I was informed that all of us attract the Basic rate of tax subject to personal allowances, and the only way to get this back is to ask for a temporary tax code for her. ??? So they get the money first and you have to do all the work to get it back !:rolleyes:

 

Regards

 

Dettie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Detti,

Not sure how this is worked out especially as new personal allowances have been announced.

perhaps it might be worth seeking independent advice mean while I would certainly get a temporary tax code for her to put itaight and stop any further

deductions as it can take months++ to get a refund,rumours of 6months

unopened mail at some tax offices. Good luck

regards

Brig.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brigjac,

 

Just thought I would share info gained from Tax office recently. My daughter is 13 and is receiving a very very very small monthly pension until she is 18 through my late husbands work pension. Income tax was taken off this under the code BR cumulative and when I queried it, I was informed that all of us attract the Basic rate of tax subject to personal allowances, and the only way to get this back is to ask for a temporary tax code for her. ??? So they get the money first and you have to do all the work to get it back !:rolleyes:

 

Regards

 

Dettie

 

There's a common myth that children don't pay tax - that's simply not true. In fact, they're taxed in exactly the same way as adults, which means each child can in the 2010-11 tax year earn up to £6,475 tax free from salary, savings or investments.

 

The difference is, unlike most adults, most children don't use up their allowance, so their savings interest is tax free.

 

Assuming your child won't earn more than £6,475 (watch out child prodigies!), ensure any interest is paid without the tax being automatically deducted by filling out the Inland Revenue R85 form (the bank should give you one of these).

 

If you've already overpaid, you'll need to fill out an R40 form to get it back.

 

Special rules for money from parents

 

However, there's a proviso that any interest earned on money specifically given to them by a parent is only tax-free up to £100 interest, per parent or step-parent. If your child earns more than £100, the whole lot is taxed at the parent's rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...